A joker in the class: Teenage readers' attitudes and preferences to reading on different devices

Library and Information Science Research

Volumn 36, Issue 3-4, 2014, Pages 179-184

  Tveit, Åse Kristine ^a   Mangen, Anne ^a,b  

^a OSLO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STAVANGER   (Norway)

Author keywords

E reading; Reading devices; Reading habits; Teenage readers

Indexed keywords

EID: 84914665956     PISSN: 07408188     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2014.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Aaltonen M., Mannonen P., Nieminen S., Nieminen M. Usability and compatibility of e-book readers in an academic environment: A collaborative study. IFLA Journal 2011, 37:16-27. 10.1177/0340035210396775.
2. Ackerman R., Goldsmith M. Metacognitive regulation of text learning: On screen versus on paper. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2011, 17:18-32.
3. Appleyard J.A. Becoming a reader: The experience of fiction from childhood to adulthood 1991, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
4. Benesh N.A. Narratives with an impact: Linguistic features of cognitive and emotional engagement in transportation 2011, (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Memphis, Tennessee.
5. Bennett S., Maton K. Beyond the "digital natives" debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students' technology experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 2010, 26:321-331.
6. Bennett S., Maton K., Kervin L. The "digital natives" debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology 2008, 39:775-786.
7. Busselle R., Bilandzic H. Measuring narrative engagement. Media Psychology 2009, 12(4):321-347. 10.1080/15213260903287259.
8. Christensen L.S. The joker 1991, White Pine Press, Fredonia.
9. Dillon A. Reading from paper versus screens: A critical review of the empirical literature. Ergonomics 1992, 35(10):1297-1326.
10. Epinion & Pluss Leadership Danskernes kulturvaner 2012 Retrieved from. http://kum.dk/servicemenu/publikationer/2012/danskernes-kulturvaner-2012/.
11. Erikson E.H. Identity: Youth and crisis 1968, Faber & Faber, London, UK.
12. Foasberg N.M. Adoption of e-book readers among college students: A survey. Information Technology and Libraries 2011, 30(3). 10.6017/ital.v30i3.1769.
13. Gerlach J., Buxmann P. Investigating the acceptance of electronic books: The impact of haptic dissonance on innovation adoption. ECIS 2011 proceedings 2011, June, Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2011/141/.
14. Green M.C., Brock T.C. The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2000, 79:701-721.
15. Grzeschik K., Kruppa Y., Marti D., Donner P. Reading in 2110 - Reading behavior and reading devices: A case study. The Electronic Library 2011, 29:288-302.
16. Hayler M. Incorporating technology: A phenomenological approach to the study of artefacts and the popular resistance to e-reading 2011, (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Exeter, United Kingdom.
17. Helsper E.J., Eynon R. Digital natives: Where is the evidence?. British Educational Research Journal 2010, 36(3):503-520.
18. Hernon P., Hopper R., Leach M.R., Saunders L.L., Zhang J. E-book use by students: Undergraduates in economics, literature and nursing. Journal of Academic Librarianship 2007, 33:3-13.
19. Jeong H. A comparison of the influence of electronic books and paper books on reading comprehension, eye fatigue, and perception. The Electronic Library 2012, 30:390-408. 10.1108/02640471211241663.
20. Jones C., Ramanau R., Cross S., Healing G. Net generation or digital natives: Is there a distinct new generation entering university?. Computers & Education 2010, 54(3):722-732.
21. Kim H., Kim J. Reading from an LCD monitor versus paper: Teenagers' reading performance. International Journal of Research Studies in Educational Technology 2013, 2(1):1-10.
22. Kretzschmar F., Pleimling D., Hosemann J., Füssel S., Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I., Schlesewsky M. Subjective impressions do not mirror online reading effort: Concurrent EEG-eyetracking evidence from the reading of books and digital media. PLoS ONE 2013, 8(2). 10.1371/journal.pone.0056178.
23. Livingstone S. Digital learning and participation among youth: Critical reflections on future research priorities. International Journal of Learning and Media 2010, 2(2-3):1-13.
24. Livingstone S. Critical reflections on the benefits of ICT in education. Oxford Review of Education 2012, 38:9-24.
25. Mangen A. Hypertext fiction reading: Haptics and immersion. Journal of Research in Reading 2008, 31(4):404-419.
26. Mangen, A., and Kuiken, D. (in press). Lost in the iPad: Narrative engagement on paper and tablet. Scientific Study of Literature, 4(2).
27. Mangen A., Schilhab T.S.S. An embodied view of reading: Theoretical considerations, empirical findings, and educational implications. Skriv! Les! 2012, 285-300. Akademika, Trondheim, Norway. S. Matre, A. Skaftun (Eds.).
28. Mangen A., Walgermo B., Brønnick K. Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research 2013, 58:61-68. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/3055159/Mangen_A._Walgermo_B._and_Bronnick_K._2013_._Reading_linear_texts_on_paper_versus_computer_screen_Effects_on_reading_comprehension.
29. Manguel A. A history of reading 1997, Flamingo, London, UK.
30. Margaryan A., Littlejohn A., Vojt G. Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students' use of digital technologies. Computers & Education 2011, 56(2):429-440. 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.004.
31. Miranda T., Williams-Rossi D., Johnson K.A., McKenzie N. Reluctant readers in middle school: Successful engagement with text using the e-reader. International Journal of Applied Science and Technology 2011, 1(6):81-91.
32. Nell V. Lost in a book: The psychology of reading for pleasure 1988, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
33. Norwegian Media Authority Barn og medier 2014 2014, Norwegian Media Authority, Oslo, Norway, Retrieved from http://www.medietilsynet.no/Tema/Barn-og-unge/.
34. Ofcom Children and parents: Media use and attitudes report. (Research document) 2013, Ofcom, London, UK, Retrieved from http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/media-literacy/october-2013/research07Oct2013.pdf.
35. Pattuelli M.C., Rabina D. Forms, effect, function: LIS students' attitudes towards portable e-book readers. Aslib proceedings: New information perspectives 2010, 62(3):228-244.
36. Prensky M. Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon 2001, 9:1-6.
37. Rose E. The phenomenology of on-screen reading: University students' lived experience of digitised text. British Journal of Educational Technology 2011, 42(3):515-526. 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01043.x.
38. Ross C.S. Readers advisory: Matching mood and material. Library Journal 2001, 126(2):52-55.
39. Scarry E. Dreaming by the book 2001, Princeton University Press, Princeton., NJ.
40. Shelburne W.A. E-book usage in an academic library: User attitudes and behaviors. Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services 2009, 33:59-72.
41. Siegenthaler E., Wurtz P., Bergamin P., Groner R. Comparing reading processes on e-ink displays and print. Displays 2011, 32(5):268.
42. Slater R. Why aren't e-books gaining more ground in academic libraries? E-book use and perceptions: A review of published literature and research. Journal of Web Librarianship 2010, 4:305-331.
43. Stoop J., Kreutzer P., Kircz J.G. Reading and learning from screens versus print: A study in changing habits. Part 1. Reading long information rich texts. New Library World 2013, 114:284-300.
44. Stoop J., Kreutzer P., Kircz J.G. Reading and learning from screens versus print: A study in changing habits. Part 2. Comparing different text structures on paper and on screen. New Library World 2013, 114:371-383.
45. Tveit Å.K. Reading habits and library use among young adults. New Review of Children's Literature and Librarianship 2012, 18:85-104. 10.1080/13614541.2012.714341.
46. Vaage O.F. Norsk mediebarometer 2013 2014, Statistisk sentralbyrå, Oslo, Norway, Retrieved from http://www.ssb.no/kultur-og-fritid/artikler-og-publikasjoner/norsk-mediebarometer-2013.
47. van der Weel A. Changing our textual minds: Towards a digital order of knowledge 2011, Manchester University Press, Manchester, UK.
48. Wästlund E. Experimental studies of human-computer interaction: Working memory and mental workload in complex cognition 2007, (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Gothenburg University, Gøteborg, Sweden, Retrieved from https://gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/2077/4693/1/gupea_2077_4693_1.pdf.
49. Wästlund E., Reinikka H., Norlander T., Archer T. Effects of VDT and paper presentation on consumption and production of information: Psychological and physiological factors. Computers in Human Behavior 2005, 21:377-394. 10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.007.