Effects of VDT and paper presentation on consumption and production of information: Psychological and physiological factors

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 377-394

  Wästlund, Erik ^a   Reinikka, Henrik ^a   Norlander, Torsten ^a   Archer, Trevor ^b  

^a KARLSTAD UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Convergent; Divergent; Mental workload; Stress; Tiredness; VDT

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERS; ENCODING (SYMBOLS); HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; PROBLEM SOLVING; STATISTICAL METHODS;

CONVERGENT; DIVERGENT; MENTAL WORKLOAD; STRESS; TIREDNESS; VIDEO DISPLAY TERMINALS (VDT);

FLUORESCENT SCREENS;

EID: 10444253901     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.007     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operations of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 27.
2. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Oxford: Westview Press.
3. APA (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (IV ed.). Washington, DC: APA.
4. Arai, D. (1999). Introduktion till kognitiv psykologi [Introduction to cognitive psychology]. Lund: Studentlitteratur [Student literature].
5. Arbetarskyddsstyrelsen (1999). Du och din dator [You and your computer], (Pressmeddelande [News report]): Arbetarskyddsstyrelsen [National Institute for Workplace Protection].
6. Belmore, S. M. (1985). Reading computer-presented text. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23, 12-14.
7. Bergström, A., & Wadbring, I. (1999). Internet. In U. Carlsson (Ed.), Medie sverige [Media Sweden] 1999/2000 (pp. 239-246). Gothenburg: NORDICOM.
8. Edfeldt, A. W. (1982). Läsprocessen Grundbok om läsforskning [The process of reading: Fundamentals of reading research]. Stockholm: Liber Utbildningsförlaget [Liber Education Publishers].
9. Edwards, S. M. (2001). The technology paradox: Efficiency versus creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 221-228.
10. Ekvall, G. (1969). Rubriker: Användarmanual [Headlines: users manual]. Malmö: Psykologifödieresisrlaget [Psychology Publishers].
11. Ghiselin, B. (1963). Ultimate criteria for two levels of creativity. In C. W. Tyler & F. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity. New York: Wiley.
12. Gray, S. H. (1991). Information search with dynamic text vs. paper text: An empirical comparison. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 35, 575-586.
13. Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
14. Hintze, A. (2002). Privatpersoners användning av datorer och Internet 2001 [Private persons' applications of computers and internet]. SCB rapport [Report from the Central Bureau of Statistics], Sweden.
15. Hogg, A. M., & Vaughan, G. M. (1998). Social psychology. Essex: Prentice-Hall.
16. Iwanowski, S. (1989). Utprovning av adjektivchecklistan [Testing the adjective checklist]. Solna, Sweden: Arbetsmiljöinstitutet: Enheten för psykofysiologi [National Institute for Workplace Protection: Unit of Psychophysiology].
17. Jolicoeur, P., & Dell, A. R. (1999). Attentional and structural constraints on visual encoding. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 62, 154-164.
18. Jones, W. P. (1994). Computer use and cognitive style. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26, 514-522.
19. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
20. Kjellberg, A., & Iwanowski, S. (1989). Stress/energiformuläret: Utveckling av en metod för skattning av sinnesstämning i arbetet [The Stress/arousal questionnaire: Development of a method for assessment of mood at work] (Undesrsökninsrapport [Research report] No. 1989:26). Arbetsmiljöinstitutet [National Institute for Workplace Protection], Solna, Sweden.
21. Koch, I., & Prinz, W. (2002). Process interference and code overlap in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 192-201.
22. Kopf, A. (2002). Företagens användning av datorer och Internet 2001 [Corporate applications of computers and internet]. SCB rapport [Report from the Central Bureau of Statistics], Stockholm, Sweden.
23. Lovallo, W. R. (1997). Stress and health: Biological and psychological interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Lubart, T. I. (2001). Models of the creative process: Past, present and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3-4), 295-308.
25. Martinsen, Ø., & Kaufmann, G. (1999). Cognitive style and creativity. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity. San Diego: Academic Press.
26. Mayes, D. K., Sims, V. K., & Koonce, J. M. (2001). Comprehension and workload differences for VDT and paper-based reading. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 28(6), 367-378.
27. Neisser, U. (1976), Cognition and reality. San Francisco: Freeman.
28. Nowlis, V. (1965). Research with the mood adjective checklist. In S. S. Tomkins & C. E. Izard (Eds.), Affect, cognition and personality: Empirical studies (pp. 352-389). New York: Springer.
29. Observatoriet för IT. (2001). No: 25/2001. Observatoriet för IT, lärande, kunskap och kompetens [Observatory for IT, learning, knowledge and competence], Stockholm.
30. Parasuraman, A. (2000). Technology Readiness Index [TRI] - A multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal of Service Research, 4(2), 307-320.
31. Parish, T. S., & Necessary, J. R. (1996). An examination of cognitive dissonance and computer attitudes. Education, 116, 565-566.
32. Partridge, D., & Rowe, J. (1994). Computers and creativity. Wiltshire, England: Intellect Books.
33. Proctor, R. W., & Van Zandt, T. (1994). Human factors in simple and complex systems. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
34. Razmjou, S. (1989). Arbetsmiljö institutet: Undersökninsrapport [National Institute for Workplace Protection: Research Report], Solna, Sweden.
35. Rice, G. (1994). Examining constructs in reading comprehension using two presentation modes: Paper vs. computer. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 11, 153-178.
36. Smith, B., Caputi, P., & Rawstorne, P. (2000). Differentiating computer experience and attitudes toward computers: An empirical investigation. Computers in Human Behavior, 16(1), 59-81.
37. Taylor, S. E., Kemeny, M. E., Reed, G. M., Bower, J. E., & Gruenwald, T. L. (2000). Psychological resources, positive illusions, and health. American Psychologist, 55, 99-109
38. Triandis, H. C. (1994). Culture and social behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
39. Varg, N. (1997). Negativ affektivitets inverkan påsvarsbeteende i enkätformulär [The influence of negative affect upon responding to questionaires], Stockholm University Report, Stockholm.
40. Waern, Y. (1990). Cognitive aspects of computer supported tasks. Great Britain: Courier International Ltd.
41. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
42. Wästlund, E., Norlander, T., & Archer, T. (2001). Internet blues revisited: Replication and extension of an Internet Paradox Study. Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 4(3), 385-391.
43. Yerkes, R. M., & Dodson, J. D. (1908). The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit formation. Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology, 18, 459-482.
44. Ziefle, M. (1998). Effects of display resolution on visual performance. Human Factors, 40(4), 554-568.