Drawing skill is related to the efficiency of encoding object structure

i-Perception

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 101-119

  Perdreau, Florian ^a   Cavanagh, Patrick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

Artists; Drawing accuracy; Expertise; Impossible objects; Object perception; Object structure

Indexed keywords

EID: 84914173381     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20416695     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1068/i0635     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Bacon-Macé, N., Macé, M. J.-M., Fabre-Thorpe, M., & Thorpe, S. J. (2005). The time course of visual processing: backward masking and natural scene categorisation. Vision Research, 45(11), 1459-1469. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2005.01.004
2. Bates, D., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B. (2012). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes.
3. Bouma, H. (1970). Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature, 226, 177-178. doi:10.1038/226177a0
4. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 433-436. doi:10.1163/156856897X00357
5. Cai, R. H., Pouget, A., Schlag-Rey, M., & Schlag, J. (1997). Perceived geometrical relationships affected by eye-movement signals. Nature, 386(6625), 601-604. doi:10.1038/386601a0
6. Carrasco, M., & Seamon, J. G. (1996). Priming impossible figures in the object decision test: The critical importance of perceived stimulus complexity. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3(3), 344-351. doi:10.3758/BF03210758
7. Carson, L., Millard, M., Quehl, N., & Danckert, J. (2012). Drawing expertise predicts not just quality but also accuracy. Perception, 41 (ECVP Abstract Supplement), 231.
8. Chakravarthi, R., & Van Rullen, R. (2011). Bullet trains and steam engines: Exogenous attention zips but endogenous attention chugs along. Journal of Vision, 11(4), 1-12. doi:10.1167/11.4.12
9. Chamberlain, R., & McManus, I. C. (2013). Subjective and objective measures of drawing accuracy and their relationship to perceptual abilities. Perception, 42 (ECVP Abstract Supplement), 106.
10. Chamberlain, R., McManus, I. C., Riley, H., Rankin, Q., & Brunswick, N. (2013). Local processing enhancements associated with superior observational drawing are due to enhanced perceptual functioning, not weak central coherence. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(November), 1448-1466. doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.750678
11. Coen-Cagli, R., Coraggio, P., Napoletano, P., Schwartz, O., Ferraro, M., & Boccignone, G. (2009). Visuomotor characterization of eye movements in a drawing task. Vision Research, 49(8), 810-818. doi:10.1016/j. visres.2009.02.016
12. Cohen, D. J. (2005). Look little, look often: The influence of gaze frequency on drawing accuracy. Perception and Psychophysics, 67(6), 997-1009. doi:10.3758/BF03193626
13. Cohen, D. J., & Bennett, S. (1997). Why can't most people draw what they see? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23(3), 609-621. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.23.3.609
14. Cohen, D. J., & Earls, H. (2010). Inverting an image does not improve drawing accuracy. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(3), 168-172. doi:10.1037/a0017054
15. Cohen, D. J., & Jones, H. E. (2008). How shape constancy relates to drawing accuracy. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(1), 8-19. doi:10.1037/1931-3896.2.1.8
16. Cornelissen, F. W., Peters, E. M., & Palmer, J. (2002). The eyelink toolbox: Eye tracking with MATLAB and the psychophysics toolbox. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 34(4), 613-617. doi:10.3758/BF03195489
17. Cowie, R., & Perrott, R. (1993). From line drawings to impressions of 3D objects: Developing a model to account for the shapes that people see. Image and Vision Computing, 11(6), 342-352. doi:10.1016/0262- 8856(93)90013-7
18. Crawford, J. D., Medendorp, W. P., & Marotta, J. J. (2004). Spatial transformations for eye-hand coordination. Journal of Neurophysiology, 92(1), 10-19. doi:10.1152/jn.00117.2004
19. Donnelly, N., Found, A, & Müller, H. J. (1999). Searching for impossible objects: Processing form and attributes in early vision. Perception and Psychophysics, 61(4), 675-690. doi:10.3758/BF03205538
20. Drake, J. E., & Winner, E. (2011). Realistic drawing talent in typical adults is associated with the same kind of local processing bias found in individuals with ASD. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41(9), 1192-1201. doi:10.1007/s10803-010-1143-3
21. Elo, A. E. (1978). The rating of chessplayers, past and present. London: Batsford.
22. Freud, E., Avidan, G., & Ganel, T. (2013). Holistic processing of impossible objects: Evidence from Garner's speeded-classification task. Vision Research. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2013.10.001
23. Freud, E., Ganel, T., & Avidan, G. (2013). Representation of possible and impossible objects in the human visual cortex: Evidence from fMRI adaptation. NeuroImage, 64, 685-692. doi:10.1016/j. neuroimage.2012.08.070
24. Germine, L., Nakayama, K., Duchaine, B. C., Chabris, C. F., Chatterjee, G., & Wilmer, J. B. (2012). Is the Web as good as the lab? Comparable performance from Web and lab in cognitive/perceptual experiments. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 19(5), 847-857. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0296-9
25. Glazek, K. (2012). Visual and motor processing in visual artists: Implications for cognitive and neural mechanisms. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(2), 155-167. doi:10.1037/a0025184
26. Gobet, F., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Templates in chess memory: A mechanism for recalling several boards. Cognitive Psychology, 31(1), 1-40. doi:10.1006/cogp.1996.0011
27. Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2007). Action-video-game experience alters the spatial resolution of vision. Psychological Science, 18(1), 88-94. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01853.x
28. Greene, M. R., & Oliva, A. (2009). Recognition of natural scenes from global properties: Seeing the forest without representing the trees. Cognitive Psychology, 58(2), 137-176. doi:10.1016/j. cogpsych.2008.06.001
29. Greenwood, J. A, Bex, P. J., & Dakin, S. C. (2009). Positional averaging explains crowding with letter-like stimuli. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(31), 13130-13135. doi:10.1073/pnas.0901352106
30. Hayes, S., & Milne, N. (2011). What's wrong with this picture? an experiment in quantifying accuracy in 2D portrait drawing. Visual Communication, 10(2), 149-174. doi:10.1177/1470357211398442
31. He, S., Cavanagh, P., & Intriligator, J. (1996). Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness. Nature, 383(3), 334-337. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(97)89058-4
32. He, S., Cavanagh, P., & Intriligator, J. (1997). Attentional resolution. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1(3), 115-121. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(97)89058-4
33. Hochstein, S., & Ahissar, M. (2002). View from the top: Hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system. Neuron, 36(5), 791-804. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(02)01091-7
34. Kesten, H. (1958). Accelerated stochastic approximation. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 29(1), 41-59. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177706705
35. Kosslyn, S. M., Ball, T. M., & Reiser, B. J. (1978). Visual images preserve metric spatial information: evidence from studies of image scanning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 4(1), 47-60. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.4.1.47
36. Kozbelt, A., Seidel, A., El Bassiouny, A., Mark, Y., & Owen, D. R. (2010). Visual selection contributes to artists' advantages in realistic drawing. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(2), 93-102. doi:10.1037/a0017657
37. Land, M. F. (2006). Eye movements and the control of actions in everyday life. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, 25(3), 296-324. doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2006.01.002
38. Locher, P. (2010). How does a visual artist create an artwork? In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 131-144). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Martelli, M., Majaj, N. J., & Pelli, D. G. (2005). Are faces processed like words? A diagnostic test for recognition by parts. Journal of Vision, 5, 58-70. doi:10.1167/5.1.6
40. McManus, I. C., Loo, P., Chamberlain, R., Riley, H., & Brunswick, N. (2011). Does shape constancy relate to drawing ability? Two failures to replicate. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 29(2), 191-208. doi:10.2190/EM.29.2.d
41. Mitchell, P., Ropar, D., Ackroyd, K., & Rajendran, G. (2005). How perception impacts on drawings. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 31(5), 996-1003. doi:10.1037/0096- 1523.31.5.996
42. New, B., Pallier, C., Brysbaert, M., & Ferrand, L. (2004). Lexique 2: A new French lexical database. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36(3), 516-524. doi:10.3758/BF03195598
43. Ostrofsky, J., Kozbelt, A., & Seidel, A. (2012). Perceptual constancies and visual selection as predictors of realistic drawing skill. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(2), 124-136. doi:10.1037/a0026384
44. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The videotoolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 437-442. doi:10.1163/156856897X00366
45. Perdreau, F., & Cavanagh, P. (2011). Do artists see their retinas? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5(171), 1-10. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00171
46. Perdreau, F., & Cavanagh, P. (2013a). Is artists' perception more veridical? Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7(6), 1-11. doi:10.3389/fnins.2013.00006
47. Perdreau, F., & Cavanagh, P. (2013b). The artist's advantage: Better integration of object information across eye movements. i-Perception, 4(6), 380-395. doi:10.1068/i0574
48. Posner, M., Petersen, S., Fox, P., & Raichle, M. (1988). Localization of cognitive operations in the human brain. Science, 240(4859), 1627-1631.
49. Prins, N. (2012). The psychometric function: the lapse rate revisited. Journal of Vision, 12(6), 1-16. doi:10.1167/12.6.25
50. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372-422. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
51. Schacter, D. L., Cooper, L. A., & Delaney, S. M. (1990). Implicit memory for unfamiliar objects depends on access to structural descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 119, 5-24. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.119.1.5
52. Schacter, D. L., Cooper, L. A, Delaney, S. M., Peterson, M. A, & Tharan, M. (1991). Implicit memory for possible and impossible objects: Constraints on the construction of structural descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(1), 3-19. doi:10.1037/0278- 7393.17.1.3
53. Seamon, J., & Carrasco, M. (1999). The effect of study time on priming possible and impossible figures in the object decision test. Psicothema, 11(4), 801-813.
54. Soldan, A., Hilton, H. J., & Stern, Y. (2009). Bias effects in the possible/impossible object decision test with matching objects. Memory and Cognition, 37(2), 685-692. doi:10.3758/MC.37.2.235
55. Tchalenko, J. (2007). Eye movements in drawing simple lines. Perception, 36(8), 1152-1167. doi:10.1068/p5544
56. Tchalenko, J. (2009). Segmentation and accuracy in copying and drawing: experts and beginners. Vision Research, 49(8), 791-800. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2009.02.012
57. Tchalenko, J., & Miall, R. C. (2009). Eye-hand strategies in copying complex lines. Cortex, 45(3), 368-376. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2007.12.012
58. Thorpe, S., Fize, D., & Marlot, C. (1996). Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature, 381, 520-522. doi:10.1038/381520a0
59. Toet, A., & Levi, D. (1992). The two-dimensional shape of spatial interaction zones in the parafovea. Vision Research, 32(7), 1349-1357. doi:10.1163/156856894X00350
60. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 97-136. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5
61. Whitney, D., & Levi, D. M. (2011). Visual crowding: a fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(4), 160-168. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.02.005
62. Williams, P., & Tarr, M. J. (1997). Structural processing and implicit memory for possible and impossible figures. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(6), 1344-1361. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.23.6.1344