The effect of study time on priming possible and impossible figures in the object decision test

Psicothema

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 801-813

  Seamon, John G ^a   Carrasco, Marisa ^b  

^a WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345977469     PISSN: 02149915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Attneave, F. (1955). Symmetry, information, and memory for patterns. American Journal of Psychology, 68, 209-222.
2. Attneave, F. (1957). Physical determinants of the judged complexity of shapes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53 , 221-227.
3. Carrasco, M., & Seamon, J. G. (1996). Priming impossible figures in the object decision task: The critical importance of perceived stimulus complexity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 344-351.
4. Chipman, S. F., (1977). Complexity and structure in visual patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 269-301.
5. Cooper, L. A., Schacter, D. L., Ballesteros, S., & Moore, C. (1992). Priming and recognition of transformed three-dimensional objects: Effects of size and reflection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 43-57.
6. Fehrer, E. V. (1935). An investigation of the learning of visually perceived forms. American Journal of Psychology, 47, 187-221.
7. French, R. S. (1954). Identification of dot patterns from memory as a function of complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 22-26.
8. Ganor-Stern, D., Seamon, J. G., & Carrasco, M. (1998). The role of attention and study time in explicit and implicit memory for unfamiliar visual stimuli. Memory & Cognition, 26, 1.187-1.195.
9. Graf, P. (1994). Explicit and implicit memory: A decade of research. In D. L. Schacter & E. Tulving (Eds.), Memory Systems 1994. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Graf, P., & Schacter, D. L. (1985). Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 11, 501-518.
11. Hawley, K. J., & Johnston, W. A. (1991). Long-term perceptual memory for briefly exposed words as a function of awareness and attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 807-815.
12. Hochberg, J., & Brooks, V. (1960). The psychophysics of form: reversible-perspective drawings of spatial objects. American Journal of Psychology, 73, 337-354.
13. Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 306-340.
14. Moscovitch, M., Goshen-Gottstein, Y., & Vriezen, E. (1994). Memory without conscious recollection: A tutorial review from a neuropsychological perspective. In C. Umilta and M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and Performance XV: Conscious and Nonconscious Information Processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Musen, G. (1991). Effects of verbal labeling and exposure duration on implicit memory for visual patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 954-962.
16. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1995). Bias in the priming of object decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 754-767.
17. Richardson-Klavehn, A., & Bjork, R. A. (1988). Measures of memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 475-543.
18. Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1993). Implicit memory in normal subjects. In J. Grafman & F. Boller (Eds.), Handbook of Neuropsychology, vol. 8. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
19. Schacter, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 501-518.
20. Schacter, D. L., & Cooper, L. A., (1993). Implicit and explicit memory for novel visual objects: Structure and function. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19, 995-1009.
21. Schacter, D. L., Cooper, L. A., & Delaney, S. M. (1990). Implicit memory for unfamiliar objects depends on access to structural descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 5-24.
22. Schacter, D. L., Cooper, L. A., Delaney, S. M., Peterson, M. A., & Tharan, M. (1991). Implicit memory for possible and impossible objects: Constraints on the construction of structural descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 3-19.
23. Seamon, J. G., Marsh, R. L., & Brody, N. (1984). Critical importance of exposure duration for affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 465-469.
24. Seamon, J. G., Williams, P. C., Crowley, M. J., Kim, I. J., Langer, S. A., Orne, P. J., & Wishengrad, D. L. (1995). The mere exposure effect is based on implicit memory: Effects of stimulus type, encoding conditions, and number of exposures on recognition and affect judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 711-721.