A comparative study of ripening among berries of the grape cluster reveals an altered transcriptional programme and enhanced ripening rate in delayed berries

Journal of Experimental Botany

Volumn 65, Issue 20, 2014, Pages 5889-5902

  Gouthu, Satyanarayana ^a,b   O'Neil, Shawn T ^a   Di, Yanming ^b   Ansarolia, Mitra ^b   Megraw, Molly ^b   Deluc, Laurent G ^a,b  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Enhanced ripening; grape; hormone; plasticity; ripening synchronization; transcriptional programme

Indexed keywords

VITACEAE;

PHYTOHORMONE;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; DNA MICROARRAY; FRUIT; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; TIME; VITIS;

FRUIT; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS; TIME FACTORS; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC; VITIS;

EID: 84913555607     PISSN: 00220957     EISSN: 14602431     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eru329     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Ali MB, Howard S, Chen S, Wang Y, Yu O, Kovacs LG, Qiu W. 2011. Berry skin development in Norton grape: distinct patterns of transcriptional regulation and flavonoid biosynthesis. BMC Plant Biology 11, 7.
2. Bailey TL. 20 11. DREME: motif discovery in transcription factor ChIP-seq data. Bioinformatics 27, 1653-1659.
3. Balibrea ME, Cuartero J, Bolar ín MC, Pérez-Alfocea F. 2003. Sucrolytic activities during fruit development of Lycopersicon genotypes differing in tolerance to salinity. Physiologia Plantarum 118, 38-46.
4. Bangerth F. 1989. Dominance among fruits: sinks and the search for a correlative signal. Physiologia Plantarum 76, 608-614.
5. Bangerth F, Li C-J. 2000. Mutual interaction of auxin and cytokinins in regulating correlative dominance. Plant Growth Regulators 32, 205-217.
6. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B: Statistical Methodology 57, 289-300.
7. Bonhomme L, Valot B, Tardieu F, Zivy M. 2012. Phosphoproteome dynamics upon changes in plant water status reveal early events associated with rapid growth adjustment in maize leaves. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 11, 957-972.
8. Boss PK, Thomas MR. 2002. Association of dwarfism and floral induction with a grape ?green revolution? mutation. Nature 416, 847-850.
9. Bö ttcher C, Burbidge CA, Boss PK, Davies C. 2013. Interactions between ethylene and auxin are crucial to the control of grape (Vitis vinifera L.) berry ripening. BMC Plant Biology 13, 222.
10. Böttcher C, Har vey K, Forde CG, Boss PK, Davies C. 2010a. Auxin treatment of pre-veraison grape (Vitis vinifera L.) berries both delays ripening and increases the synchronicity of sugar accumulation. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research 17, 1-8.
11. Bö ttcher C, Keyzers RA, Boss PK, Davies C. 2010b. Sequestration of auxin by the indole-3-acetic acid-amido synthetase GH3-1 in grape berry (Vitis vinifera L.) and the proposed role of auxin conjugation dur ing ripening. Journal of Experimental Botany 61, 3615-3625.
12. Bretz F, Hothorn T, Westfall P. 2010. Multiple comparisons using R. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
13. Bustan A. 1995. Interacti ons between developing citrus fruits and their supportive vascular system. Annals of Botany 76, 657-666.
14. Carbonell-Bejerano P, Santa Maria E, Torres-Perez R, Royo C, Lijavetzky D, Bravo G, Aguirreole a J, Sanchez-Diaz M, Antolin MC, Martinez-Zapater JM. 2013. Thermotolerance responses in ripening berries of Vitis vinifera L. cv Muscat Hamburg. Plant and Cell Physiology 54, 1200-1216.
15. Carreno J, Mart inez A. 1995. Proposal of an index for the objective evaluation of the color of red table grapes. Food Research International 28, 373-377.
16. Castellarin SD, Gambetta GA, Wada H, Shackel KA, Matthews M A. 2011. Fruit ripening in Vitis vinifera: spatiotemporal relationships among turgor, sugar accumulation, and anthocyanin biosynthesis. Journal of Experimental Botany 62, 4345-4354.
17. Chervin C El-Kereamy A Roustan JP Latché A. 2004 Ethylene seems required for the berry development and ripening in grape, a nonclimacteric fruit Plant Science 167 1301-1305.
18. Coombe B. 1995. Adoption of a system for identifying grapevine growth stages. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research 1, 100-110.
19. Costantini L, Battilana J, Lamaj F, Fanizza G, Grando M. 2008. Berry and phenology-related traits in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.): from quantitative trait loci to underlying genes. BMC Plant Biology 8, 38.
20. Dai ZW, Ollat N, Gomes E, et al. 2011. Ecophysiological, genetic, and molecular causes of variation in grape b erry weight and composition: a review. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 62, 413-425.
21. Dal Santo S, Tornielli GB, Zenoni S, Fasoli M, Farina L, Anesi A, Guzzo F, Delledonne M, Pezzot ti M. 2013. The plasticity of the grapevine berry transcriptome. Genome Biology 14, r54.
22. Davies C, Bö ttcher C. 2009. Hormonal control of grape berry ripening. In: Roubelakis-Angelakis KA, ed. Grapevine molecular physiology & biotechnology, 2nd edn. Berlin: Springer, 229-261.
23. Deluc LG, Grimplet J, Wheatley MD, Tillett RL, Quilici DR, Osborne C, Schooley DA, Schlauch KA, Cushman JC, Cramer GR. 2007. Transcriptomic and metabolite analyses of Cabernet Sauvignon grape berry deve lopment. BMC Genomics 8, 429.
24. Deluc LG, Quilici DR, Decendit A, Grimplet J, Wheatley MD, Schlauch KA, Merillon J-M, Cushman JC, Cramer GR. 2009. Water deficit alters differentially m etabolic pathways affecting important flavor and quality traits in grape berries of Cabernet Sauvignon and Chardonnay. BMC Genomics 10, 212.
25. Dorcey E, Urbez C, Blazquez MA, Carbonell J, Perez-Amador M.A. 2009. Fertilization-dependent auxin response in ovules triggers fruit development through the modulation of gibberellin metabolism in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal 58, 318-332.
26. Du Z, Zhou X, Ling Y, Zhang Z, Su Z. 2010. AgriGO: a GO analysis toolkit for the agricultural community. Nucleic Acids Research 38, W64-W70.
27. Eveland AL, Jackson DP. 2012. Sugars, signalling, and plant development. Journal of Experimental Botany 63, 3367-3377.
28. Gambetta GA, Matthews MA, Shaghasi TH, McElrone AJ, Castellarin SD. 2010. Sugar and abscisic acid signaling orthologs are activated at the onset of ripening in grape. Pla nta 232, 219-234.
29. Gapper NE, McQuinn RP, Giovannoni JJ. 2013. Molecular and genetic regulation of fruit ripening. Plant Molecular Biology 82, 575-591.
30. Gouthu S, Morre J, Maie r CS, Deluc LG. 2012. An analytical method to quantify three plant hormone families in grape berry using liquid chromatography and multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry. In: David GR, ed. Phytochemicals, plant growth, and the environ ment. New York: Springer, 19-36.
31. Guillaumie S, Fouquet R, Kappel C, Camps C, Terrier N, Moncomble D, Dunlevy JD, Davies C, Boss PK, Delrot S. 2011. Transcriptional analysis of late ripeni ng stages of grapevine berry. BMC Plant Biology 11, 165.
32. Hanson J, Smeekens S. 2009. Sugar perception and signaling-an update. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 12, 562-567.
33. Herbers K , Sonnewald U. 1998. Molecular determinants of sink strength. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 1, 207-216.
34. Ho LC. 1988. Metabolism and compartmentation of imported sugars in sink organs in relation to sink strength. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular BioIogy 39, 355-378.
35. Ishimaru T, Hirose T, Matsuda T, Goto A, Takahashi K, Sasaki H, Terao T, Ishii R-I, Ohsugi R, Yam agishi T. 2005. Expression patterns of genes encoding carbohydrate-metabolizing enzymes and their relationship to grain filling in rice (Oryza sativa L.): comparison of caryopses located at different positions in a panicle. Plant and Cell Ph ysiology 46, 620-628.
36. Joas J, Vulcain E, Desvignes C, Morales E, Léchaudel M. 2011. Physiological age at harvest regulates the variability in postharvest ripening, sensory and nutritional characteristics of m ango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Coghshall due to growing conditions. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 92, 1282-1290.
37. Klee HJ, Giovannoni JJ. 2011. Genetics and control of tomato fruit ripening and quality attributes. Annual Review of Genetics 45, 41-59.
38. Kontoudakis N Esteruelas M Fort F Canals JM Freitas VD Zamora F 2011 Influence of the heterogeneity of grape phenolic maturity on wine composition and quality. Food Chemistry 124 767-774.
39. Lemmens K, De Bie T, Dhollander T, et al. 2009. D ISTILLER: a data integration framework to reveal condition dependency of complex regulons in Escherichia coli. Genome Biology 10, R27.
40. Lijavetzky D, Carbonell-Bejerano P, Grimplet J, Bravo G, Flores P, Fenoll J, Hellín P, Oliveros JC, Martí nez-Zapater JM. 2012. Berry flesh and skin ripening features in Vitis vinifera as assessed by transcriptional profiling. PLoS One 7, e39547.
41. Lund ST, Peng FY, Na yar T, Reid KE, Schlosser J. 2008. Gene expression analyses in individual grape (Vitis vinifera L.) berries during ripening initiation reveal that pigmentation intensity is a valid indicator of developmental staging within the cluster. Plant Molecular Biology 68, 301-315.
42. Martinez-Esteso MJ, Selles-Marchart S, Lijavetzky D, Pedreno MA, Bru-Martinez R. 2011. A DIGE-based quantitative proteomic analysis of grape berry flesh development and ripening reveals key events in sugar and organic acid metabolism. Journal of Experimental Botany 62, 2521-2569.
43. Matsoukas IG, Massiah AJ, Thomas B. 2013. Starch metabolism and antiflorigenic signals modulate the juvenile-to-adult phase transition in Arabidopsis. Plant, Cell and Environment 36, 1802 -1811.
44. McAtee P, Karim S, Schaffer R, David K. 2013. A dynamic interplay between phytohormones is required for fruit de velopment, maturation, and ripening. Frontiers in Plant Science 4, 1-7.
45. Olimpieri I, Siligato F, Caccia R, Soressi GP, Mazzucato A, Mariotti L, Ceccarelli N. 2007. Tomato fruit set driven by pollination or by the parthenocarpic fruit allele are mediated by transcriptionally regulated gibberellin biosynthesis. Planta 226, 877-888.
46. Osorio S, Fernie AR. 2013. Biochemistry of fruit ripening. In: Seymour GB, Poole M, Giovannoni JJ, Tucker GA, eds. The molecular biology and biochemistry of fruit ripening. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1-20.
47. Pagay V, Cheng L. 2010. Variability in berry maturation of concord and Cabernet franc in a cool climate. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 61, 61-67.
48. Pastore C, Zenoni S, Tornielli GB, Allegro G, Dal Santo S, Valentini G, Intrieri C, Pezzotti M, Filippetti I. 2011. Increasing the source/sink ratio in Vitis vinifera (cv Sangiovese) induces extensive transcriptome reprogramming and modifies berry ripening. BMC Genomics 12, 631.
49. Pilati S, Per azzolli M, Malossini A, Cestaro A, Dematte L, Fontana P, Ri AD, Viola R, Velasco R, Moser C. 2007. Genome-wide transcriptional analysis of grapevine berry ripening reveals a set of genes similarly modulated during three seas ons and the occurrence of an oxidative burst at véraison. BMC Genomics 8, 428.
50. R Development Core Team. 2012. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
51. Rolland F, Baena-Gonzalez E, Sheen J. 2006. Sugar sensing and signaling in plants: conserved and novel mechanisms. Annual Review of Plant Biology 57, 675-709.
52. Smeekens S, Ma J, Hanson J, Rolland F. 2010. Sugar signals and molecular networks controlling plant growth. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 13, 273-278.
53. Smyth GK. 2004. Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology 3, Article3.
54. Stephenson AG, Delvin B, Brian HJ. 1988. The effects of s eed number and prior fruit dominance on the pattern of fruit production in Cucurbits pepo (Zucchini Squash). Annals of Botany 62, 653-661.
55. Swindell WR, Huebner M, Weber AP. 2007. Plastic and adaptive gene expression patterns associated with temperature stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Heredity (Edinburgh) 99, 143-150.
56. Tardieu F, Granier C, Muller B. 2011. Water deficit and growth. Co-ordinating processes without an orchestratorfi Current Opinion in Plant Biology 14, 283-289.
57. Thomas TR, Shackel KA, Matthews M.A. 2008. Mesocarp cell turgor in Vitis vinifera L. berries throughout development and its relation to firmness , growth, and the onset of ripening. Planta 228, 1067-1076.
58. Walch-Liu P, Neumann G, Bangerth F, Engels C. 2000. Rapid effects of nitrogen form on leaf morphogenesis in tobacco. Journal of Experimental Botany 51, 227-237.
59. Zenoni S Ferrarini A Giacomelli E Xumerle L Fasoli M Malerba G Bellin D Pezzotti M Delledonne M 2010 Characterization of transcriptional complexity duri ng berry development in Vitis vinifera using RNA-seq. Plant Physiology 152 1787-1795.
60. Zhang X, Luo G, Wang R, Wang J, Himelrick GH. 2003. Growth and developmental responses of seeded and seedless grape berries to shoot girdling. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 128, 316-323.
61. Ziliotto F, Corso M, Rizzini FM, Rasori A, Botton A, Bonghi C. 2012. Grape berry ripening dela y induced by a pre-veraison NAA treatment is paralleled by a shift in the expression pattern of auxin-and ethylenerelated genes. BMC Plant Biology 12, 185.
62. Zrenner R, Salanoubat M, Willmitzer L, Sonnewald U. 1995 . Evidence of the crucial role of sucrose synthase for sink strength using transgenic potato plants (Solanum tuberosum L.). The Plant Journal 7, 97-107.