A genre approach to the effect of academic questions on CLIL students’ language production

Language and Education

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 15-30

  Llinares, Ana ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

academic questions; classroom interaction; CLIL; genre; systemic functional linguistics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84911988227     PISSN: 09500782     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09500782.2014.924964     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Barnes, D. 1969. “Language in the Secondary Classroom.” In Language, the Learner and the School, edited by D. Barnes, J. Britton, and M. Torbe, 11–77. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
2. Carter, R., and M.J. McCarthy. 1997. Exploring Spoken English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Cenoz, J, F. Genesee, and D. Gorter. 2013. “Critical Analysis of CLIL: Taking Stock and Looking Forward.” Applied Linguistics. doi:10.1093/applin/amt011.
4. Christie, F. 2002. “The Development of Abstraction in Adolescence in Subject English.” In Developing Advanced Literacy in First and Second Languages: Meaning With Power, edited by M. Schleppegrell and M.C. Colombi, 45–66. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Christie, F., and B. Derewianka. 2008. School Discourse: Learning to Write Across the Years of Schooling. London: Continuum.
6. Coffin, C. 2006a. Historical Discourse: The Language of Time, Cause and Evaluation. London: Continuum.
7. Coffin, C. 2006b. “Reconstruing ‘Personal Time’ as ‘Collective Time’: Learning the Discourse of History.” In Language and Literacy: Functional Approaches, edited by R. Whittaker, M. O’Donnell, and A. McCabe, 207–230. London: Continuum.
8. Coyle, D. 2006. “Motivating Teachers Motivating Learners Through Content and Language Integrated Learning.” Scottish Modern Languages Review 13: 1–18.
9. Coyle, D. 2007. “The CLIL Quality Challenge.” In Diverse Contexts-Converging Goals. CLIL in Europe, edited by D. Marsh and D. Wolff, 47–58. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
10. Coyle, D., P. Hood, and D. Marsh. 2010. Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Crooks, T.J. 1988. “The Impact of Classroom Evaluation on Students.” Review of Educational Research 5: 438–481.
12. Crystal, D. 1991. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
13. Dalton-Puffer, C. 2007. Discourse in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
14. Dalton-Puffer, C., T. Nikula, and U. Smit. 2010a. “Charting Policies, Premises and Research on Content and Language Integrated Learning.” In Language use and Language Learning in CLIL Classrooms, edited by C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, and U. Smit, 1–19. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
15. Dalton-Puffer, C., T. Nikula, and U. Smit. 2010b. “Current Findings and Contentious Issues.” In Language Use and Language Learning in CLIL Classrooms, edited by C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, and U. Smit, 279–292. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
16. Dalton-Puffer, C., and U. Smit, eds. 2007. Empirical Perspectives on CLIL Classroom Discourse. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
17. Halliday, M.A.K., and C.M.I.M. Matthiessen. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd ed. London: Arnold.
18. Harlen, W., and J. Winter. 2004. “The Development of Assessment for Learning: Learning from the Case of Science and Mathematics.” Language Testing 21 (3): 390–408.
19. Hunt, K.W. 1965. Grammatical Structures Written at Three Grade Levels. Champaign, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
20. Lasagabaster, D., and Y. Ruiz de Zarobe. 2010. “The Emergence of CLIL in Spain: An Educational Challenge.” In CLIL in Spain: Implementation, Results and Teacher Training, edited by D. Lasagabaster and Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, ix–xvii. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
21. Lasagabaster, D., and J.M. Sierra. 2010. “Immersion and CLIL in English: More Differences than Similarities.” English Language Teaching Journal 64 (4): 367–375.
22. Leung, C. 2005. “Language and Content in Bilingual Education.” Linguistics and Education 16: 238–252.
23. Llinares, A., and E. Dafouz. 2010. “Content and Language Integrated Programmes in the Madrid Region: Overview and Research Findings.” In CLIL in Spain: Implementation, Results and Teacher Training, edited by D. Lasagabaster and Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, 95–114. UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
24. Llinares, A., and T. Morton. 2010. “Historical Explanations as Situated Practice in Content and Language Integrated Learning.” Classroom Discourse 1 (1): 65–84.
25. Llinares, A., T. Morton, and R. Whittaker. 2012. The Roles of Language in CLIL. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Llinares, A., and R. Whittaker. 2009. “Teaching and Learning History in Secondary CLIL Classrooms: From Speaking to Writing.” In CLIL Across Educational Levels, edited by E. Dafouz and M.C. Guerrini, 73–89. Madrid: Santillana Educación S. L./Richmond Publishing.
27. Llinares, A., and R. Whittaker. 2010. “Writing and Speaking in the History Class: Data from CLIL and First Language Contexts.” In Language Use and Language Learning in CLIL Classrooms, edited by C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, and U. Smit, 125–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
28. Lyster, R. 2007. Learning and Teaching Languages Through Content: A Counterbalanced Approach. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
29. Martin, J.R. 1989. Factual Writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. Martin, J.R. 1992. English Text. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
31. Martin, J.R. 2002. “Writing History: Construing Time and Value in Discourses of the Past.” In Developing Advanced Literacy in First and Second Languages: Meaning with Power, edited by M.J. Schleppegrell and M.C. Colombi, 87–118. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32. Martín Úriz, A, and R. Whittaker, eds. 2005. La composición como comunicación: Una experiencia en las aulas de lengua inglesa en Bachillerato [The Composition as Communication: An Experience at Upper-secondary EFL Classrooms]. Madrid: Universidad Autónoma Ediciones.
33. McCormick, D.E., and R. Donato. 2000. “Teacher Questions as Scaffolded Assistance in an ESL Classroom.” In Second and Foreign Language Learning Through Classroom Interaction, edited by J.K. Hall and L.S. Verplaetse, 183–201. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
34. Mehan, H. 1979. Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35. Mercer, N., L. Dawes, R. Wegerif, and C. Sams. 2004. “Reasoning as a Scientist: Ways of Helping Children to Use Language to Learn Science.” British Educational Research Journal 30: 359–377.
36. Morton, T. 2010. “Using a Genre-Based Approach to Integrating Content and Language in CLIL: The Example of Secondary History.” In Language Use and Language Learning in CLIL Classrooms, edited by C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, and U. Smit, 81–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
37. Nassaji, H., and G. Wells. 2000. “What's the Use of Triadic Dialogue? An Investigation of Teacher–Student Interaction.” Applied Linguistics 21 (3): 376–406.
38. Nikula, T. 2007. “The IRF Pattern and Space for Interaction: Comparing CLIL and EFL Classrooms.” In Empirical Perspectives on CLIL Classroom Discourse, edited by C. Dalton-Puffer and U. Smit, 179–204. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
39. Nikula, T., C. Dalton-Puffer, and A. Llinares García. 2013. “CLIL Classroom Discourse.” Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 1 (1): 70–100.
40. O’Donnell, M. 2008. “Demonstration of the UAM CorpusTool for Text and Image Annotation.” In Proceedings of the ACL-08: HLT Demo Session (Companion Volume), edited by J. Lin, 13–16. Columbus, OH: Association for Computational Linguistics.
41. Pérez-Vidal, C. 2009. “The Integration of Content and Language in the Classroom: A European Approach to Education (the Second Time Around).” In CLIL Across Educational Levels, edited by E. Dafouz and M.C. Guerrini, 3–16. Madrid: Santillana Educación S.L./Richmond Publishing.
42. Pica, T., R. Young, and C. Doughty. 1987. “The Impact of Interaction on Comprehension.” Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages Quarterly 21 (4): 737–758.
43. Redfield, D.L., and E.W. Rousseau. 1981. “A Meta-analysis of Experimental Research on Teacher Questioning Behavior.” Review of Educational Research 51: 237–245.
44. Riesco Bernier, S. 2007. “Modelling the Discourse-Grammar Interface of EFL Pre-School Teacher Talk (Native and Non-native): Proposal of a System Network Enabling the Systematic Analysis of Regulatory Functions.” PhD diss., Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
45. Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. 2011. “Which Language Competencies Benefit from CLIL? An Insight into Applied Linguistics Research.” In Content and Foreign Language Integrated Learning: Contributions to Multilingualism in European Contexts, edited by Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, J.M. Sierra, and F. Gallardo del Puerto, 129–154. Bern: Peter Lang.
46. Schleppegrell, M.J. 1996. “Conjunction in Spoken English and ESL Writing.” Applied Linguistics 17 (3): 271–285.
47. Schleppegrell, M.J. 2004. The Language of Schooling. Norwood, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
48. Sinclair, J., and M. Coulthard. 1975. Towards an Analysis of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49. Veel, R., and C. Coffin. 1996. “Learning to Think Like an Historian: The Language of Secondary School History.” In Literacy in Society, edited by R. Hasan and G. Williams, 191–231. London: Longman.
50. Whittaker, R., and A. Llinares. 2009. “CLIL in Social Science Classrooms: Analysis of Written and Spoken Productions.” In Content and Language Integrated Learning: Evidence from Research in Europe, edited by Y. Ruiz de Zarobe and R.M. Jiménez Catalán, 215–234. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
51. Wolff, D. 2007. “CLIL: Bridging the Gap Between School and Working Life.” In Diverse Contexts-Converging Goals. CLIL in Europe, edited by D. Marsh and D. Wolff, 15–25. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
52. Young, R. 1995. “Conversational Styles in Language Proficiency Interviews.” Language Learning 45 (1): 3–42.