Getting at the Core of Literacy Improvement: A Case Study of an Urban Secondary School

Education and Urban Society

Volumn 46, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 580-605

  Francois, Chantal ^a  

^a The State University of New Jersey   (United States)

Author keywords

accountability; literacy; school improvement; urban education

Indexed keywords

EID: 84911976650     PISSN: 00131245     EISSN: 15523535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0013124512458116     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Biancarosa G.,Snow C. E.Reading next—A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report to the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education; 2004:
2. Brown A. L.,Armbruster B. B.,Baker L.Reading comprehension: From research to practice. Orasanu J., ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1986:48-76.
3. Time to act: An agenda for advancing adolescent literacy for college and career success. New York, NY: Carnegie Corporation of New York; 2010:
4. Chall J.New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1983:
5. Charmaz K.Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2006:
6. Childress S.,Elmore R.,Grossman A.How to manage urban school districts.Harvard Business Review. 2006;84 (11): 55-68
7. Cohen D. K.,Ball D. L.Instruction, capacity, and improvement. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania; 1999:
8. Corrin W.,Somers M.,Kemple J. J.,Nelson E.,Sepanik S.The enhanced reading opportunities study: Findings from the second year of implementation. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance; 2008:
9. Darling-Hammond L.,Wei R. C.,Andree A.,Richardson N.,Orphanos S.Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. Oxford, OH: National Staff Development Council and The School Redesign Network at Stanford University; 2009:
10. Davies B.,Harre R.Positioning: The social construction of selves.Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. 1990;20:43-63
11. Delpit L.Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York, NY: The New Press; 1995:
12. Diamond J. B.,Randolph A.,Spillane J. P.Teachers’ expectations and sense of responsibility for student learning: The importance of race, class, and organizational habitus.Anthropology and Education Quarterly. 2004;35 (1): 75
13. DuFour R.,DuFour R.,Eaker R.Professional learning communities at work: New insights for improving schools. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree; 2008:
14. Elmore R. F.School reform from the inside out: Policy, practice, and performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press; 2007:
15. Evans R.The human side of school change: Reform, resistance, and the real-life problems of innovation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2001:
16. Ferguson R.The black-white test score gap. Jencks C.Phillips M., ed. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 1998:273-317.
17. Galda L.,Beach R.Response to literature as a cultural activity.Reading Research Quarterly. 2001;36 (1): 64
18. Gaskins I. W.Rethinking reading comprehension. Sweet A. P.Snow C. E., ed. New York, NY: Guilford; 2003:141.
19. Glaser B. G.,Strauss A. L.The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine; 1967:
20. Glesne C.,Peshkin A.Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. White Plains, NY. 1992;:
21. Gronn P.The new work of educational leaders: Changing leadership practice in an era of school reform. London: Paul Chapman; 2003:
22. Halverson R. R.Systems of practice and professional community: The Adams case Distributed leadership in practice. Spillane J. P.Diamond J. B., ed. New York, NY: Teachers College Press; 2007:35-62.
23. Ivey G.,Broaddus K.“Just plain reading”: A survey of what makes students want to read in middle school classrooms.Reading Research Quarterly. 2001;36 (4): 350-377
24. Jetton T. L.,Dole J. A.Adolescent literacy research and practice. New York, NY: Guilford; 2004:
25. Keene E.Improving comprehension instruction: Rethinking research, theory, and classroom practice. Block C. C.Gambrell L. B.Pressley M., ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2002:80-105.
26. King J.Dysconscious racism: Ideology, identity, and the miseducation of teachers.Journal of Negro Education. 1991;60 (2): 133-46
27. Ladson-Billings G.Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice. Hammond L. D.Sykes G., ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1999:
28. Langer J. A.Effective literacy instruction: Building successful reading and writing programs. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English; 2002:
29. Langer J. A.Getting to excellent: How to create better schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press; 2004:
30. Lewis C.Lesson study: A handbook of teacher-led instructional change. Philadelphia, PA: Research for Better Schools; 2002:
31. Little J. W.Teachers’ accounts of classroom experience as a resource for professional learning and instructional decision making.Yearbook (National Society for the Study of Education). 2007;:217-240
32. Lortie D. C.Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: The University of College Press; 1975:
33. Louis K. S.Change over time? An introduction? A reflection?.Educational Administration Quarterly. 2006;42 (1): 165
34. Maxwell J.A.Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2005:
35. Meyer J. W.,Rowan B.Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony.American Journal of Sociology. 1977;83:340-363
36. Murphy J.Leadership for literacy: A framework for policy and practice.School Effectiveness & School Improvement. 2004;15 (1): 65-96
37. National Center for Education Statistics. (2010). The nation’s report card: 2009 trial urban district assessment in reading. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2010459
38. New York City Department of Education. (2008). 2008 definitions of performance levels. Retrieved from http://schools.nyc.gov/Accountability/YearlyTesting/TestResults/ELATestResults/default.htm
39. New York State Testing and Accountability Reporting Tool. (2008). Grant Street Secondary School: High school accountability and overview report. Retrieved from https://www.nystart.gov/nystart/lobby.do
40. Oakes J.Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. 2005). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 2005:
41. Palincsar A. S.Rethinking reading comprehension. Sweet A. P.Snow C. E., ed. New York, NY: Guilford; 2003:99-114.
42. Payne C.So much reform, so little change: The persistence of failure in urban schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press; 2008:
43. Pressley M.,Raphael L.,Gallagher J. D.,DiBella J.Providence-St. Mel school: How a school that works for African American students works.Journal of Educational Psychology. 2004;96 (2): 216-235
44. RAND. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1465/
45. Rex L. A.,Green J. L.,Dixon C. N.What counts when context counts? The uncommon “common” language of literacy research.Journal of Literacy Research. 1998;30 (3): 405-433
46. Seidman I.Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York, NY: Teachers College Press; 2006:
47. Smith W.,Andrews R.Instructional leadership: How principals make a difference. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development; 1989:
48. Snow C. E.Rethinking reading comprehension. Sweet A. P.Snow C. E., ed. New York, NY: Guilford; 2003:192-206.
49. Snow C. E.,Griffin P.,Burns S.Knowledge to support the teaching of reading: Preparing teachers for a changing world. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2005:
50. Stanovich K.Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy.Reading Research Quarterly. 1986;21:360-407
51. Steinberg J.Creating and sustaining a professional learning community at the secondary level. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Institute for School Leadership; 2007:
52. Tyack D.,Cuban L.Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1995:
53. Vygotsky L. S.Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1978:
54. Yin R. K.Case study research: Design and methods. 2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2003:
55. Yin R. K.Case study research: Design and methods. 2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2009: