Propensity score-matched analysis of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement

Circulation Journal

Volumn 78, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 2876-2881

  Hiraoka, Arudo ^a   Totsugawa, Toshinori ^a   Kuinose, Masahiko ^a   Nakajima, Kosuke ^b   Chikazawa, Genta ^a   Tamura, Kentaro ^a   Yoshitaka, Hidenori ^a   Sakaguchi, Taichi ^a  

^a THE SAKAKIBARA HEART INSTITUTE OF OKAYAMA   (Japan)

^b TOKYO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Aortic stenosis; Cardiovascular disease; Surgery; Valvular disease

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AORTA CLAMPING; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OPERATION DURATION; PROPENSITY SCORE; REHABILITATION CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; STERNOTOMY; THORACOTOMY; AGED; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVALUATION STUDY; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; INTENSIVE CARE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; OPERATIVE TIME; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROPENSITY SCORE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STERNOTOMY; THORACOTOMY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84911885203     PISSN: 13469843     EISSN: 13474820     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-14-0861     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Tabata M, Fukui T, Takanashi S. Do minimally invasive approaches improve outcomes of heart valve surgery? Circ J 2013; 77: 2232-2239.
2. Bakir I, Casselman FP, Wellens F, Jeanmart H, De Geest R, Degrieck I, et al. Minimally invasive versus standard approach aortic valve replacement: A study in 506 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 81: 1599-1604.
3. Glauber M, Miceli A, Bevilacqua S, Farneti PA. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement via right anterior minithoracotomy: Early outcomes and midterm follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 142: 1577-1579.
4. Brinkman WT, Hoffman W, Dewey TM, Culica D, Prince SL, Herbert MA, et al. Aortic valve replacement surgery: Comparison of outcomes in matched sternotomy and PORT ACCESS groups. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 90: 131-135.
5. Glauber M, Miceli A, Gilmanov D, Ferrarini M, Bevilacqua S, Farneti PA, et al. Right anterior minithoracotomy versus conventional aortic valve replacement: A propensity score matched study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 145: 1222-1226.
6. Hiraoka A, Kuinose M, Chikazawa G, Katayama K, Totsugawa T, Yoshitaka H. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement surgery: Comparison of port-access and conventional standard approach. Circ J 2011; 75: 1656-1660.
7. Austin PC. Propensity-score matching in the cardiovascular surgery literature from 2004 to 2006: A systematic review and suggestions for improvement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 134: 1128-1135.
8. Mihaljevic T, Cohn LH, Unic D, Aranki SF, Couper GS, Byrne JG. One thousand minimally invasive valve operations: Early and late results. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 529-534.
9. Brown ML, McKellar SH, Sundt TM, Schaff HV. Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009; 137: 670-679.
10. Aris A, Camara ML, Montiel J, Delgado LJ, Galan J, Litvan H. Ministernotomy versus median sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: A prospective, randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 67: 1583-1587.
11. Machler HE, Bergmann P, Anelli-Monti M, Dacar D, Rehak P, Knez I, et al. Minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve operations: A prospective study in 120 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 67: 1001-1005.
12. Bonacchi M, Prifti E, Giunti G, Frati G, Sani G. Does ministernotomy improve postoperative outcome in aortic valve operation?: A prospective randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73: 460-465.
13. Plass A, Scheffel H, Alkadi H, Kaufmann P, Genoni M, Falk V, et al. Aortic valve replacement through a minimally invasive approach: Preoperative planning, surgical technique and outcome. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 88: 1851-1856.
14. Glower DD, Teng L, Desai B. Aortic valve replacement through right minithoracotomy in 306 consecutive patients. Innovations 2010; 5: 326-330.
15. Cerillo AG, Bevilacqua S, Farneti PA, Concistrè G, Glauber M. Sutureless aortic valve replacement through a right minithoracotomy. J Heart Valve Dis 2012; 21: 168-171.
16. Santarpino G, Pfeiffer S, Concistré G, Grossmann I, Hinzmann M, Fischlein T. The Perceval S aortic valve has the potential of shortening surgical time: Does it also result in improved outcome? Ann Thorac Surg 2013; 96: 77-82.
17. Lorusso R, Gelsomino S, Renzulli A. Sutureless aortic valve replacement: An alternative to transcatheter aortic valve implantation? Curr Opin Cardiol 2013; 28: 158-163.
18. D'Onofrio A, Messina A, Lorusso R, Alfieri OR, Fusari M, Rubino P, et al. Sutureless aortic valve replacement as an alternative treatment for patients belonging to the "gray zone" between transcatheter aortic valve implantation and conventional surgery: A propensitymatched, multicenter analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 144: 1010-1016.
19. Kobayashi J. Changing strategy for aortic stenosis by transcatheter valve treatment in Japan. Circ J 2013; 77: 309-310.
20. Sawa Y, Saito S, Kobayashi J, Niinami H, Kuratani T, Maeda K, et al; MDT-2111 Japan Investigators. First clinical trial of a self-expandable transcatheter heart valve in Japan in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Circ J 2014; 78: 1083-1090.