Do minimally invasive approaches improve outcomes of heart valve surgery?

Circulation Journal

Volumn 77, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 2232-2239

  Tabata, Minoru ^a   Fukui, Toshihiro ^a   Takanashi, Shuichiro ^a  

^a SAKAKIBARA HEART INSTITUTE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Aortic stenosis; Minimally invasive surgery; Mitral valve; Valvular heart disease

Indexed keywords

AORTA VALVE; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTERY CATHETERIZATION; ATHEROSCLEROSIS; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CARDIOVASCULAR MORTALITY; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; HEART PAPILLARY MUSCLE; HEART VALVE SURGERY; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MITRAL VALVE PROLAPSE; MITRAL VALVE REGURGITATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; STERNOTOMY; THORACOTOMY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; FEMALE; HEART VALVE DISEASES; HEART VALVES; HUMANS; MALE; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE;

EID: 84882786410     PISSN: 13469843     EISSN: 13474820     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-13-0827     Document Type: Review

References (56)

1. Navia JL, Cosgrove DM. Minimally invasive mitral valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1996; 62: 1542-1544.
2. Cohn LH, Adams DH, Couper GS, Bichell DP, Rosborough DM, Sears SP, et al. Minimally invasive cardiac valve surgery improves patient satisfaction while reducing costs of cardiac valve replacement and repair. Ann Surg 1997; 226: 421-426.
3. Meticanti L. Endoscopic mitral valve reconstruction and percutaneous mitral clipping: What is the best solution for our patients? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012; 42: 913-914.
4. Gillinov AM, Cosgrove DM. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: Mini-sternotomy with extended transseptal approach. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999; 11: 206-211.
5. Atik FA, Svensson LG, Blackstone EH, Gillinov AM, Rajeswaran J, Lytle BW. Less invasive versus conventional double-valve surgery: A propensity-matched comparison. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 141: 1461-1468.
6. Tabata M, Khalpey Z, Shekar PS, Cohn LH. Reoperative minimal access aortic valve surgery: Minimal mediastinal dissection and minimal injury risk. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008; 136: 1564-1568.
7. Svensson LG, D'Agostino RS. Minimal-access aortic and valvular operations, including the "J/j" incision. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66: 431-435.
8. von Segesser LK, Westaby S, Pomar J, Loisance D, Groscurth P, Turina M. Less invasive aortic valve surgery: Rationale and technique. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999; 15: 781-785.
9. Bonacchi M, Prifti E, Giunti G, Frati G, Sani G. Does ministernotomy improve postoperative outcome in aortic valve operation? A prospective randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73: 460-465.
10. Farhat F, Lu Z, Lefevre M, Montagna P, Mikaeloff P, Jegaden O. Prospective comparison between total sternotomy and ministernoto-my for aortic valve replacement. J Card Surg 2003; 18: 396-401.
11. Corbi P, Rahmati M, Donal E, Lanquetot H, Jayle C, Menu P, et al. Prospective comparison of minimally invasive and standard techniques for aortic valve replacement: Initial experience in the first hundred patients. J Card Surg 2003; 18: 133-139.
12. Mihaljevic T, Cohn LH, Unic D, Aranki SF, Couper GS, Byrne JG. One thousand minimally invasive valve operations: Early and late results. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 529-534.
13. Doty DB, Flores JH, Doty JR. Cardiac valve operations using a partial sternotomy (lower half) technique. J Card Surg 2000; 15: 35-42.
14. Cosgrove DM, Saik JF, Navia JL. Minimally invasive valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 65: 1535-1539.
15. Lee TC, Desai B, Glower DD. Results of 141 consecutive minimally invasive tricuspid valve operations: An 11-year experience. Ann Tho-rac Surg 2009; 88: 1845-1850.
16. Mihos CG, Santana O, Lamas GA, Lamelas J. Outcomes of right minithoracotomy mitral valve surgery in patients with previous ster-notomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 91: 1824-1827.
17. Pfannmüller B, Misfeld M, Borger MA, Etz CD, Funkat AK, Garbade J, et al. Isolated reoperative minimally invasive tricuspid valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg 2012; 94: 2005-2010.
18. Hiraoka A, Kuinose M, Chikazawa G, Totsugawa T, Katayama K, Yoshitaka H. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement surgery: Comparison of port-access and conventional standard approach. Circ J 2011; 75: 1656-1660.
19. Glauber M, Miceli A, Gilmanov D, Ferrarini M, Bevilacqua S, Farneti PA, et al. Right anterior minithoracotomy versus conventional aortic valve replacement: A propensity score matched study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 145: 1222-1226.
20. Yozu R, Shin H, Maehara T. Minimally invasive cardiac surgery by the port-access method. Artif Organs 2002; 26: 430-437.
21. Chitwood WR Jr, Elbeery JR, Chapman WH, Moran JM, Lust RL, Wooden WA, et al. Video-assisted minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: The "micro-mitral" operation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997; 113: 413-414.
22. Schwartz DS, Ribakove GH, Grossi EA, Buttenheim PM, Schwartz JD, Applebaum RM, et al. Minimally invasive mitral valve replacement: Port-access technique, feasibility, and myocardial functional preservation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997; 113: 1022-1030.
23. Wang D, Wang Q, Yang X, Wu Q, Li Q. Mitral valve replacement through a minimal right vertical infra-axillary thoracotomy versus standard median sternotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 87: 704-708.
24. Saunders PC, Grossi EA, Sharony R, Schwartz CF, Ribakove GH, Culliford AT, et al. Minimally invasive technology for mitral valve surgery via left thoracotomy: Experience with forty cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 127: 1026-1031.
25. Nifong LW, Chitwood WR, Pappas PS, Smith CR, Argenziano M, Starnes VA, et al. Robotic mitral valve surgery: A United States mul-ticenter trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 129: 1395-1404.
26. Nifong LW, Rodriguez E, Chitwood WR Jr. 540 consecutive robotic mitral valve repairs including concomitant atrial fibrillation cryoabla-tion. Ann Thorac Surg 2012; 94: 38-42.
27. Gammie JS, Zhao Y, Peterson ED, O'Brien SM, Rankin JS, Griffth BP. Less-invasive mitral valve operations: Trends and outcomes from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 90: 1401-1408.
28. Brown ML, McKellar SH, Sundt TM, Schaff HV. Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009; 137: 670-679.
29. Johnston DR, Atik FA, Rajeswaran J, Blackstone EH, Nowicki ER, Sabik JF 3rd, et al. Outcomes of less invasive J-incision approach to aortic valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 144: 852-858.
30. Brinkman WT, Hoffman W, Dewey TM, Culica D, Prince SL, Herbert MA, et al. Aortic valve replacement surgery: Comparison of outcomes in matched sternotomy and PORTACCESS groups. Ann Tho-rac Surg 2010; 90: 131-135.
31. Svensson LG, Atik FA, Cosgrove DM, Blackstone EH, Rajeswaran J, Krishnaswamy G, et al. Minimally invasive versus conventional mitral valve surgery: A propensity-matched comparison. J Thorac Car-diovasc Surg 2010; 139: 926-932.
32. Grossi EA, Galloway AC, Ribakove GH, Zakow PK, Derivaux CC, Baumann FG, et al. Impact of minimally invasive valvular heart surgery: A case-control study. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71: 807-810.
33. Speziale G, Nasso G, Esposito G, Conte M, Greco E, Fattouch K, et al. Results of mitral valve repair for Barlow disease (bileafet prolapse) via right minithoracotomy versus conventional median ster-notomy: A randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 142: 77-83.
34. Cheng DC, Martin J, Lal A, Diegeler A, Folliguet TA, Nifong LW, et al. Minimally invasive versus conventional open mitral valve surgery: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Innovations (Phila) 2011; 6: 84-103.
35. Mihaljevic T, Jarrett CM, Gillinov AM, Williams SJ, DeVilliers PA, Stewart WJ, et al. Robotic repair of posterior mitral valve prolapse versus conventional approaches: Potential realized. J Thorac Car-diovasc Surg 2011; 141: 72-80.
36. Suri RM, Burkhart HM, Daly RC, Dearani JA, Park SJ, Sundt TM 3rd, et al. Robotic mitral valve repair for all prolapse subsets using techniques identical to open valvuloplasty: Establishing the benchmark against which percutaneous interventions should be judged. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 142: 970-979.
37. Raanani E, Spiegelstein D, Sternik L, Preisman S, Moshkovitz Y, Smolinsky AK, et al. Quality of mitral valve repair: Median sternot-omy versus port-access approach. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 140: 86-90.
38. Tabata M, Umakanthan R, Cohn LH, Bolman RM 3rd, Shekar PS, Chen FY, et al. Early and late outcomes of 1000 minimally invasive aortic valve operations. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008; 33: 537-541.
39. Ruttmann E, Gilhofer TS, Ulmer H, Chevtchik O, Kocher A, Schistek R, et al. Propensity score-matched analysis of aortic valve replacement by mini-thoracotomy. J Heart Valve Dis 2010; 19: 606-614.
40. McClure RS, Athanasopoulos LV, McGurk S, Davidson MJ, Couper GS, Cohn LH. One thousand minimally invasive mitral valve operations: Early outcomes, late outcomes, and echocardiographic follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 145: 1199-1206.
41. Seeburger J, Borger MA, Doll N, Walther T, Passage J, Falk V, et al. Comparison of outcomes of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery for posterior, anterior and bileafet prolapse. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009; 36: 532-538.
42. Casselman FP, Van Slycke S, Wellens F, De Geest R, Degrieck I, Van Praet F, et al. Mitral valve surgery can now routinely be performed endoscopically. Circulation 2003; 108(Suppl 1): II48-II54.
43. Aklog L, Adams DH, Couper GS, Gobezie R, Sears S, Cohn LH. Techniques and results of direct-access minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: A paradigm for the future. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 116: 705-715.
44. Glower DD, Landolfo KP, Clements F, Debruijn NP, Stafford-Smith M, Smith PK, et al. Mitral valve operation via Port Access versus median sternotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1998; 14(Suppl 1): S143-S147.
45. Suri RM, Antiel RM, Burkhart HM, Huebner M, Li Z, Eton DT, et al. Quality of life after early mitral valve repair using conventional and robotic approaches. Ann Thorac Surg 2012; 93: 761-769.
46. Walther T, Falk V, Metz S, Diegeler A, Battellini R, Autschbach R, et al. Pain and quality of life after minimally invasive versus conventional cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 67: 1643-1647.
47. Murzi M, Cerillo AG, Miceli A, Bevilacqua S, Kallushi E, Farneti P, et al. Antegrade and retrograde arterial perfusion strategy in minimally invasive mitral-valve surgery: A propensity score analysis on 1280 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013; 43: e167-e172, doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezt043.
48. Grossi EA, Loulmet DF, Schwartz CF, Solomon B, Dellis SL, Culliford AT, et al. Minimally invasive valve surgery with antegrade perfusion strategy is not associated with increased neurologic complications. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 92: 1346-1349.
49. Muhs BE, Galloway AC, Lombino M, Silberstein M, Grossi EA, Colvin SB, et al. Arterial injuries from femoral artery cannulation with port access cardiac surgery. Vasc Endovasc Surg 2005; 39: 153-158.
50. Tabata M, Umakanthan R, Khalpey Z, Aranki SF, Couper GS, Cohn LH, et al. Conversion to full sternotomy during minimal-access cardiac surgery: Reasons and results during a 9.5-year experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 134: 165-169.
51. Aybek T, Dogan S, Risteski PS, Zierer A, Wittlinger T, Wimmer-Greinecker G, et al. Two hundred forty minimally invasive mitral operations through right minithoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 81: 1618-1624.
52. Krapf C, Wohlrab P, Häußinger S, Schachner T, Hangler H, Grimm M, et al. Remote access perfusion for minimally invasive cardiac surgery: To clamp or to infate? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013 February 22, doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezt070 [Epub ahead of print].
53. Padala M, Keeling WB, Guyton RA, Thourani VH. Innovations in therapies for heart valve disease. Circ J 2011; 75: 1028-1041.
54. Ranucci M, Frigiola A, Menicanti L, Castelvecchio S, de Vincentiis C, Pistuddi V. Aortic cross-clamp time, new prostheses, and outcome in aortic valve replacement. J Heart Valve Dis 2012; 21: 732-739.
55. Kumar AB, Suneja M, Bayman EO, Weide GD, Tarasi M. Association between postoperative acute kidney injury and duration of car-diopulmonary bypass: A meta-analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2012; 26: 64-69.
56. Vollroth M, Seeburger J, Garbade J, Pfannmueller B, Holzhey D, Misfeld M, et al. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery is a very safe procedure with very low rates of conversion to full sternotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012; 42: e13-e15, doi:10.1093/ejcts/ ezs195.