Reciprocity, transitivity, and the mysterious three-cycle

Social Networks

Volumn 40, Issue , 2015, Pages 163-173

  Block, Per ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Friendship network evolution; Reciprocity; Stochastic actor oriented models; Three cycle; Transitivity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84911868134     PISSN: 03788733     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2014.10.005     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Adler P., Adler P. Dynamics of inclusion and exclusion in preadolescent cliques?. Soc. Psychol. Q. 1995, 58(3):145-162.
2. Agneessens F., Wittek R. Where do intra-organizational advice relations come from? The role of informal status and social capital in social exchange. Soc. Netw. 2012, 34(3):333-345.
3. Allan G. Friendship and Care for elderly people?. Age. Soc. 1986, 6(01):1-12.
4. Annas J. Plato and Aristotle on Friendship and Altruism?. Mind 1977, 86(344):532-554.
5. Baerveldt C., Weerm F., Van Rossem R., Verman de M., Weerman F.M., Vermande M. Student's delinquency and correlates with strong and weaker ties: a study of students' networks in Dutch High Schools. Connections 2004, 26:11L 28.
6. Ball B., Newman M. Friendship networks and social status?. Netw. Sci. 2013, 1(1):16-30.
7. Carley K.M., Krackhardt D. Cognitive inconsistencies and non-symmetric friendship?. Soc. Netw. 1996, 18(1):1-27.
8. Cheadle J.E., Stevens M., Williams D.T., Goosby B.J. The differential contributions of teen drinking homophily to new and existing friendships: an empirical assessment of assortative and proximity selection mechanisms?. Soc. Sci. Res. 2013, 42(5):1297-1310.
9. Cochran W.G. The combination of estimates from different experiments?. Biometrics 1954, 10(1):101-129.
10. Conaldi G., Lomi A., Tonellato M. Dynamic models of affiliation and the network structure of problem solving in an open source software project?. Organ. Res. Methods 2012, 15(3):385-412.
11. Davis J.A. Structural balance, mechanical solidarity, and interpersonal relations. Am. J. Sociol. 1963, 68(4):444-462.
12. Davis J.A. Clustering and hierarchy in interpersonal relations: testing two graph theoretical models on 742 sociomatrices?. Am. J. Sociol. 1970, 35(5):843-851.
13. Davis J.A., Leinhardt S. The structure of positive interpersonal relations in small groups. Sociological Theories in Progress 1970, Houghton Mifflin, Boston. J. Berger, M. Zelditch, B. Anderson (Eds.).
14. Dijkstra J.K., Cillessen A.H.N., Lindenberg S., Veenstra R. Basking in reflected glory and its limits: why adolescents hang out with popular peers?. J. Res. Adolesc. 2010, 20(4):942-958.
15. Ellwardt L., Steglich C., Wittek R. The co-evolution of gossip and friendship in workplace social networks?. Soc. Netw. 2012, 34(4):623-633.
16. Emerson R.M. Social exchange theory. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 1976, 2:335-362.
17. Emery C., Daniloski K., Hamby a. The reciprocal effects of self-view as a leader and leadership emergence?. Small Group Res. 2011, 42(2):199-224.
18. Feld S.L. The focused organization of social ties?. Am. J. Sociol. 1981, 86(5):1015-1035.
19. Feld S.L. Social structural determinants of similarity among associates?. Am. Sociol. Rev. 1982, 47(6):797-801.
20. Fischer C.S. What do we mean by 'friend'? an inductive study. Soc. Netw. 1982, 3(4):287-306.
21. Giletta M., Scholte R.H.J., Prinstein M.J., Engels R.C.M.E., Rabaglietti E., Burk W.J. Friendship context matters: examining the domain specificity of alcohol and depression socialization among adolescents?. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 2012, 40(7):1027-1043.
22. Goodreau S.M., Kitts J.A., Morris M. Birds of feather, or friend of a friend? Using exponential random graph models to investigate adolescent social networks. Demography 2009, 46(1):103-125.
23. Granovetter M.S. The strength of weak ties'?. Am. J. Sociol. 1973, 78(6):1360-1380.
24. Granovetter M.S. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddeness?. Am. J. Sociol. 1985, 91(3):481-510.
25. Hallinan M.T. The process of friendship formation. Soc. Netw. 1978, 1:193-210.
26. Heider F. Attitudes and cognitive organization. J. Psychol. 1946, 21:107-112.
27. Heider F. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations 1958, Wiley, New York.
28. Heidler R., Gamper M., Herz A., Eßer F. Relationship patterns in the 19th century: the friendship network in a German boys' school class from 1880 to 1881 revisited. Soc. Netw. 2014, 37:1-13.
29. Hintze J., Nelson R. Violin plots: a box plot-density trace synergism?. Am. Stat. 1998, 52(2):181-184.
30. Holland P.W., Leinhardt S. Local structures in social networks. Sociol. Methodol. 1976, 7:1-45.
31. Homans G. The human Group 1950, Harcourt, Brace & World, New York.
32. Houtzager B., Baerveldt C. Just like normal: a social network study of the relation between petty crime and the intimacy of adolescent friendships?. Soc. Behav. Personal. 1999, 27(2):177-192.
33. Huitsing G., Snijders T.A.B., Van Duijn M.A.J., Veenstra R. Victims, bullies, and their defenders: a longitudinal study of the coevolution of positive and negative networks. Dev. Psychopathol. 2014, 26(3):645-659.
34. Hunter D.R., Goodreau S.M., Handcock M.S. Goodness of fit of social network models?. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 2008, 103(481):248-258.
35. Igarashi T. Longitudinal changes in face-to-face and text message-mediated friendship networks. Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks: Theories, Methods and Applications 2012, 248-259. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. D. Lusher, J. Koskinen, G. Robins (Eds.).
36. Krackhardt D. The strength of strong ties: the importance of philos in organizations. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action 1992, 216-239. Harvard Business School Press, Boston. N. Nohria, R. Eccles (Eds.).
37. Krackhardt D. Simmelian ties: super strong and sticky. Power and Influence in Organizations 1998, 21-38. Sage, Thousand Oaks. R. Kramer, M. Neale (Eds.).
38. Krackhardt D. The ties that torture: simmelian tie analysis in organizations. Res. Soc. Organ. 1999, 16:183-210.
39. Lazarsfeld P.F., Merton R.K. Friendship as a social process. Freedom and Control in Modern Society 1954, vol. 18:18-66. Van Nostrand, New York. M. Berger, T. Abel, C.S. Page (Eds.).
40. Liljeros F., Edling C.R., Amaral L.A., Stanley H.E., Aberg Y. The web of human sexual contacts. Nature 2001, 411:907-908.
41. Lospinoso J.A. Statistical Methods for Social Network Dynamics 2012, University of Oxford, Oxford, (DPhil Thesis).
42. Merton R.K. The Matthew effect in science. Science 1968, 159:56-63.
43. Molano A., Jones S.M., Brown J.L., Aber J.L. Selection and socialization of aggressive and prosocial behavior: the moderating role of social-cognitive processes?. J. Res. Adolesc. 2013, 23(3):424-436.
44. Newcomb T.M. The prediction of interpersonal attraction. Am. Psychol. 1956, 11:575-586.
45. Newcomb T.M. The Acquaintance Process 1961, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
46. Preciado P., Snijders T.A.B., Burk W.J., Stattin H., Kerr M. Does proximity matter? Distance dependence of adolescent friendships. Soc. Netw. 2012, 34(1):1-14.
47. Ripley R.M., Snijders T.A.B., Boda Z., Vörös A., Preciado P. Manual for RSiena 2013, University of Oxford, Department of Statistics; Nuffield College, Oxford.
48. Rivera M.T., Soderstrom S.B., Uzzi B. Dynamics of dyads in social networks: assortative, relational, and proximity mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 2010, 36(1):91-115.
49. Rusbult C.E., Buunk B.P. Commitment processes in close relationships: an interdependence analysis?. J. Soc. Pers. Relat. 1993, 10(2):175-204.
50. Schaefer D.R., Light J.M., Fabes R.A., Hanish L.D., Martin C.L. Fundamental principles of network formation among preschool children?. Soc. Netw. 2010, 32(1):61-71.
51. Simmel G. The Sociology of Georg Simmel 1950, New York, Free press.
52. Snijders T.A.B. The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics?. Sociol. Methodol. 2001, 31(1):1-33.
53. Snijders T.A.B. Models for longitudinal network data. Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis 2005, 215-247. Cambridge University Press, New York. P. Carrington, J. Scott, S. Wasserman (Eds.).
54. Snijders T.A.B. Statistical models for social networks?. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 2011, 37(1):131-153.
55. Snijders T.A.B., Baerveldt C. A multilevel network study of the effects of delinquent behavior on friendship evolution?. J. Math. Sociol. 2003, 27(2-3):123-151.
56. Snijders T.A.B., Steglich C.E.G. Representing micro-macro linkages by actor-based dynamic network models. Sociol. Methods Res. 2014, 10.1177/0049124113494573.
57. Snijders T.A.B., van de Bunt G.G., Steglich C.E. Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics?. Soc. Netw. 2010, 32(1):44-60.
58. Steglich C., Sinclair P., Holliday J., Moore L. Actor-based analysis of peer influence in A Stop Smoking In Schools Trial (ASSIST)?. Soc. Netw. 2012, 34(3):359-369.
59. Tortoriello M., Krackhardt D. Activating cross-boundary knowledge: the role of Simmelian ties in the generation of innovations?. Acad. Manage. J. 2010, 53(1):167-181.
60. van de Bunt G.G., Van Duijn M.A., Snijders T.A.B. Friendship networks through time: an actor-oriented dynamic statistical network model?. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 1999, 5(2):167-192.
61. van Workum N., Scholte R.H.J., Cillessen A.H.N., Lodder G.M.A., Giletta M. Selection, deselection, and socialization processes of happiness in adolescent friendship networks. J. Res. Adolesc. 2013, 23:563-573.
62. Veenstra R., Dijkstra J.K., Steglich C., Van Zalk M.H.W. Network-behavior dynamics?. J. Res. Adolesc. 2013, 23(3):399-412.
63. Veniegas R.C., Peplau L.A. Power and the quality of same-sex friendships. Psychol. Women Q. 1997, 21:279-297.