A multilevel network study of the effects of delinquent behavior on friendship evolution

Journal of Mathematical Sociology

Volumn 27, Issue 2-3, 2003, Pages 123-151

  Snijders, Tom A B ^a,c   Baerveldt, Chris ^b,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c ICS   (Netherlands)

^d ICS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Actor oriented model; Adolescents; Criminology; Longitudinal data; Social networks

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038375045     PISSN: 0022250X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00222500305892     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Aseltine, R. H. (1995). A reconsideration of parental and peer influences on adolescent deviance. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 36, 103-121.
2. Baerveldt, C., & Snijders, T. A. B. (1994). Influences on and from the segmentation of networks: Hypotheses and tests. Social Networks, 16, 213-232.
3. Baerveldt, C. (2000). Pupil's networks in high schools. Network sampling, program and some results from a theory-oriented research project on petty crime of pupils. Paper for the 2nd International Network Sampling Workshop, Maastricht, 2-4 March 2000.
4. Baerveldt, C., Vermande, M., & Van Rossem, R. (2000). Over vrienden die het ook doen. De kleine criminaliteit van scholieren en hun sociale netwerken. Sociale Wetenschappen, 43(3), 7-26.
5. Baron, S. W., & Tindall, D. B. (1993). Network structure and delinquent attitudes within a juvenile gang. Social Networks, 15, 255-273.
6. Battin, S. R., Hill, K. G., Abbott, R. D., Catalano, R. F., Richard, P., & Hawkins, D. J. (1998). The contribution of gang membership to delinquency beyond delinquent friends. Criminology, 36, 1, 93-115.
7. Bender, D., & Lösel, F. (1997). Protective and risk effects of peer relations and social support on antisocial behaviour in adolescents from multi-problem milieus. Journal of Adolescence, 20, 661-678.
8. Cochran, W. G. (1954). The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics, 10, 101-129.
9. Doreian, P., & Stokman, F. N. (Eds.), (1997). Evolution of Social Networks. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach.
10. Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11. Hansell, S., & Wiatrowski, M. D. (1981). Competing conceptions of delinquent peer relations. In: G. F. Jensen (Ed.), Sociology of Delinquency, Current Issues, pp. 93-108. Beverly Hills: Sage.
12. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. Orlando: Academic Press.
13. Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of Delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
14. Houtzager, B., & Baerveldt, C. (1999). Just like normal. A social network study of the relation between petty crime and the intimacy of adolescent friendships. Social Behavior and Personality, 27(2), 177-192.
15. Jussim, L., & Osgood, D. W. (1989). Influence and similarity among friends: an integrative model applied to incarcerated adolescents. Social Psychology Quarteryly, 52(2), 98-112.
16. Kandel, D. (1978). Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 427-436.
17. Kandel, D. B. (1996). The parental and peer contexts of adolescent deviance: an algebra of interpersonal influences. Journal of Drug Issues, 96(2), 289-315.
18. Leenders, R. Th. A. J. (1995). Structure and influence. Statistical models for the dynamics of actor attributes, network structure and their interdependence. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.
19. Leenders, R. Th. A. J. (1996). Evolution of friendship and best friendship choices. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 21, 133-148. Appeared also in Doreian, P. and Stokman, F.N. (1997).
20. Leenders, R. Th. A. J. (1997). Longitudinal behavior of network structure and actor attributes: modeling interdependence of contagion and selection. In: P. Doreian, and F. N. Stokman, (Eds.), Evolution of Social Networks, pp. 165-184. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach.
21. Lehmann, E. L. (1986). Testing Statistical Hypotheses, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
22. Marcus, R. F. (1996). The friendships of delinquents. Adolescence, 31, 145-158.
23. Moffit, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behaviour. A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review 100, 674-701.
24. Ploeger, M. (1997). Youth employment and delinquency: Reconsidering a problematic relationship. Criminology, 35(4), 659-675.
25. Reed, M. D., & Rose, D. R. (1998). Doing what Simple Simon says? Estimating the underlying causal structures of delinquent associations, attitudes and serious theft. Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 25, 240-274.
26. Sarnecki, J. (1990). Delinquent networks in Sweden. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 6, 31-50.
27. Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel Analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage.
28. Snijders, T. A. B. (2001). The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics. M. E., Sobel, and Becker, M. P. (eds.), Sociological Methodology - 2001, 361-395. Boston and London: Basil Blackwell.
29. Snijders, T. A. B., & Huisman, J. M. 2001. Manual for SIENA version 1.90. Groningen: ICS, University of Groningen. Obtainable from http://stat.gamma.rug.nl/snijders/socnet.htm.
30. Snijders, T. A. B. (2003). Models for longitudinal network data. Chapter 11 in P. Carrington, S. Wasserman, and J. S. Long (Eds.), Advances in Social Network Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Snijders, T. A. B., & Kenny, D. (1999). The Social Relations Model for family data: A multilevel approach. Personal Relationships, 6, 1999, 471-486.
32. Snijders, T. A. B. & Van Duijn, M. A. J. (1997). Simulation for statistical inference in dynamic network models. In: R., Conte, R., Hegselmann, and Terna, P. (Eds.), Simulating Social Phenomena, pp. 493-512. Berlin: Springer.
33. Sutherland, E. H. & Cressey, D. R. (1974). Criminology (9th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
34. Thornberry, T. P., Krohn, M. D., Lizotte, A. J., & Chard-Wieschem, D. (1993). The role of juvenile gangs in facilitating delinquent behaviour. Journal of research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 55-87.
35. Thornberry, T. P., Krohn, M. D., Lizotte, A. J., Farnworth, M., & Jang, S. J. (1994). Delinquent peer, beliefs, and delinquent behavior: a longitudinal test of interactional theory. Criminology, 32, 47-83.
36. Tuma, N. B., & Hallinan, M. T. (1979). The effects of sex, race, and achievement on school-children's friendships. Social Forces, 57, 1265-1285.
37. Van Duijn, M. A. J., Van Busschbach, J. T., & Snijders, T. A. B. (1999). Multilevel analysis of personal networks as dependent variables. Social Networks, 21, 187-209.
38. Van de Bunt, G. G. (1999). Friends by choice. An actor-oriented statistical network model for friendship networks through time. Amsterdam: Thela Thesis Publishers.
39. Van de Bunt, G. G., Van Duijn, M. A. J., & Snijders, T. A. B. (1999). Friendship networks through time: An actor-oriented dynamic statistical network model. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 5, 167-192.
40. Vitaro, F., Tremblay, R. E., Kerr, M., Pagani, L., & Bulowski, W. M. (1997). Disruptiveness, friends' characteristics, and delinquency in early adolescence: a test of two competing models of development. Child Development, 68, 676-689.
41. Zeggelink, E. P. H. (1995). Evolving friendship networks: An individual-oriented approach implementing similarity. Social Networks, 17, 83-110.