Mixing topics while studying does not enhance learning

Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 153-160

  Hausman, Hannah ^a   Kornell, Nate ^a  

^a WILLIAMS COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Interleaving; Learning; Memory; Metacognition; Mixing; Spacing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84911806806     PISSN: 22113681     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Benjamin, A. S., Bjork, R. A., & Schwartz, B. L. (1998). The mismeasure of memory: When retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127(1), 55-68.
2. Birnbaum, M. S., Kornell, N., Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2013). Why interleaving enhances inductive learning: The roles of discrimination and retrieval. Memory & Cognition, 41, 392-402.
3. Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In J. Metcalfe, & A. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about Knowing (pp. 185-205). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
4. Bjork, R. A., Dunlosky, J., & Kornell, N. (2012). Self-regulated learning:Beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 417-444.
5. Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin,132(3), 354-380.
6. Cepeda, N. J., Vul, E., Rohrer, D., Wixted, J. T., & Pashler, H. (2008). Spacing effects in learning: A temporal ridgeline of optimal retention. Psychological Science, 19(11),1095-1102.
7. Dempster, F. N. (1996). Distributing and managing the conditions of encoding and practice. In R. Bjork, & E. Bjork (Eds.), Memory (pp. 317-344). San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
8. Dempster, F. N. (1988). The spacing effect: A case study in the failure to apply the results of psychological research. American Psychologist, 43(8),627-634.
9. Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013).Improving students' learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4-58.
10. Hartwig, M. K., & Dunlosky, J. (2012). Study strategies of college students: Are selftesting and scheduling related to achievement? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,19(1), 126-134.
11. Kang, S. H. K., & Pashler, H. (2012). Learning painting styles: Spacing is advantageous when it promotes discriminative contrast. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(1),97-103.
12. Karpicke, J. D., & Bauernschmidt, A. (2011). Spaced retrieval: Absolute spacing enhances learning regardless of relative spacing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1250-1257.
13. Kornell, N. (2009). Optimizing learning using flashcards: Spacing is more effective than cramming. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(9),1297-1317.
14. Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2008a). Learning concepts and categories: Is spacing the enemy of induction? Psychological Science, 19(6), 585-592.
15. Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2008b). Optimising self-regulated study: The benefits -and costs - of dropping flashcards. Memory, 16(2), 125-136.
16. Mayfield, K. H., & Chase, P. N. (2002). The effects of cumulative practice on mathematics problem solving. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35,105-123.
17. Pyc, M. A., & Rawson, K. A. (2009). Testing the retrieval effort hypothesis: Does greater difficulty correctly recalling information lead to higher levels of memory? Journal of Memory and Language, 60(4), 437-447.
18. Pyc, M. A., & Rawson, K. A. (2012). Are judgments of learning made after correct responses during retrieval practice sensitive to lag and criterion level effects?Memory & Cognition, 40(6), 976-988.
19. Roediger, H. L., & Pyc, M. A. (2012). Inexpensive techniques to improve education: Applying cognitive psychology to enhance educational practice. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1, 242-248.
20. Rohrer, D. (2012). Interleaving helps students distinguish among similar concepts.Educational Psychology Review, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-012-9201-3
21. Rohrer, D., & Taylor, K. (2007). The shuffling of mathematics problems improves learning. Instructional Science, 35, 481-498.
22. Taylor, K., & Rohrer, D. (2010). The effects of interleaved practice. Applied CognitivePsychology, 24(6), 837-848.
23. Wahlheim, C. N., Dunlosky, J., & Jacoby, L. L. (2011). Spacing enhances the learning of natural concepts: An investigation of mechanisms, metacognition, and aging.Memory & Cognition, 39(5), 750-763.
24. Wissman, K. T., Rawson, K. A., & Pyc, M. A. (2012). How and when do students use flashcards? Memory, 20(6), 568-579.