Experimental and finite element analysis of dynamic loading of the mouse forearm

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 32, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 1580-1588

  Thiagarajan, Ganesh ^a   Lu, Yunkai ^a   Dallas, Mark ^b   Johnson, Mark L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dynamic load; Experiments; Finite element analysis; Interosseous membrane; Mouse forearm

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DYNAMICS; FEMALE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FOREARM; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OSSIFICATION; OSTEOCYTE; RADIUS; RIGIDITY; SIMULATION; SURFACE PROPERTY; ULNA; YOUNG MODULUS; ANIMAL; BIOMECHANICS; C57BL MOUSE; FORELIMB; MECHANICAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FORELIMB; MICE, INBRED C57BL; RADIUS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; ULNA;

EID: 84911805681     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: 1554527X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.22720     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ozcivici E, Luu YK, Adler B, et al. 2010. Mechanical signals as anabolic agents in bone. Nat Rev Rheumatol 6:50-59.
2. Lanyon LE. 1993. Osteocytes, strain detection, bone modeling and remodeling. Calcif Tissue Int 53:S102-S107.
3. Rubin C, Lanyon L. 1985. Regulation of bone mass by mechanical strain magnitude. Calcif Tissue Int 37:411-417.
4. Turner CH, Forwood M, Rho JY, et al. 1994. Mechanical loading thresholds for lamellar and woven bone formation. J Bone Miner Res 9:87-97.
5. Lanyon LE, Rubin CT. 1984. Static vs dynamic loads as an influence on bone remodelling. J Biomech 17:897-905.
6. Robling AG, Duijvelaar KM, Geevers JV, et al. 2001. Modulation of appositional and longitudinal bone growth in the rat ulna by applied static and dynamic force. Bone 29: 105-113.
7. Jacobs CR, Yellowley CE, Davis BR, et al. 1998. Differential effect of steady versus oscillating flow on bone cells. J Biomech 31:969-976.
8. Torcasio A, van Lenthe GH, Van Oosterwyck H. 2008. The importance of loading frequency, rate and vibration for enhancing bone adaptation and implant osseointegration. Eur Cell Mater 16:56-68.
9. Hsieh Y, Turner C. 2001. Effects of loading frequency on mechanically induced bone formation. J Bone Miner Res 16:918-924.
10. Mosley JR, Lanyon LE. 1998. Strain rate as a controlling influence on adaptive modeling in response to dynamic loading of the ulna in growing male rats. Bone 23: 313-318.
11. LaMothe JM, Hamilton NH, Zernicke RF. 2005. Strain rate influences periosteal adaptation in mature bone. Med Eng Phys 27:277-284.
12. Judex S, Gross TS, Zernicke RF. 1997. Strain gradients correlate with sites of exercise-induced bone-forming surfaces in the adult skeleton. J Bone Miner Res 12: 1737-1745.
13. Robling AG, Hinant FM, Burr DB, et al. 2002. Improved bone structure and strength after long-term mechanical loading is greatest if loading is separated into short bouts. J Bone Miner Res 17:1545-1554.
14. Srinivasan S, Weimer DA, Agans SC, et al. 2002. Low-magnitude mechanical loading becomes osteogenic when rest is inserted between each load cycle. J Bone Miner Res 17:1613-1620.
15. Forwood MR, Owan I, Takano Y, et al. 1996. Increased bone formation in rat tibiae after a single short period of dynamic loading in vivo. Am J Physiol 270:E419-423.
16. Turner CH, Woltman TA, Belongia DA. 1992. Structural changes in rat bone subjected to long-term, in vivo mechanical loading. Bone 13:417-422.
17. Tami AE, Nasser P, Schaffler MB, et al. 2003. Noninvasive fatigue fracture model of the rat ulna. J Orthop Res 21:1018-1024.
18. Schaffler MB, Radin EL, Burr DB. 1989. Mechanical and morphological effects of strain rate on fatigue of compact bone. Bone 10:207-214.
19. Rubin C, Lanyon L. 1984. Regulation of bone formation by applied dynamic loads. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66: 397-402.
20. Perry MJ, Parry LK, Burton VJ, et al. 2009. Ultrasound mimics the effect of mechanical loading on bone formation in vivo on rat ulnae. Med Eng Phys 31:42-47.
21. Uthgenannt BA, Silva MJ. 2007. Use of the rat forelimb compression model to create discrete levels of bone damage in vivo. J Biomech 40:317-324.
22. Gross TS, Srinivasan S, Liu CC, et al. 2002. Noninvasive loading of the murine tibia: an in vivo model for the study of mechanotransduction. J Bone Miner Res 17:493-501.
23. Silva MJ, Brodt MD, Hucker WJ. 2005. Finite element analysis of the mouse tibia: estimating endocortical strain during three-point bending in samp6 osteoporotic mice. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 283A:380-390.
24. Lu Y, Thiagarajan G, Nicolella DP, et al. 2012. Load/strain distribution between ulna and radius in the mouse forearm compression loading model. Med Eng Phys 34: 350-356.
25. Kotha SP, Hsieh YF, Strigel RM, et al. 2004. Experimental and finite element analysis of the rat ulnar loading model-correlations between strain and bone formation following fatigue loading. J Biomech 37:541-548.
26. Lynch JA, Silva MJ. 2008. In vivo static creep loading of the rat forelimb reduces ulnar structural properties at time-zero and induces damage-dependent woven bone formation. Bone 42:942-949.
27. Bonewald LF, Johnson ML. 2008. Osteocytes, mechanosens-ing and wnt signaling. Bone 42:606-615.
28. O'Connor JA, Lanyon LE, MacFie H. 1982. The influence of strain rate on adaptive bone remodelling. J Biomech 15:767-781.
29. Carter DR, Smith DJ, Spengler DM, et al. 1980. Measurement and analysis of in vivo bone strains on the canine radius and ulna. J Biomech 13:27-38.
30. Lee K, Maxwell A, Lanyon L. 2002. Validation of a technique for studying functional adaptation of the mouse ulna in response to mechanical loading. Bone 31:407-412.
31. Poliachik SL, Threet D, Srinivasan S, et al. 2008. 32 wk old c3h/hej mice actively respond to mechanical loading. Bone 42:653-659.
32. Kuruvilla S, Fox S, Cullen D, et al. 2008. Site specific bone adaptation response to mechanical loading. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 8:71-78.
33. Robling AG, Li J, Shultz KL, et al. 2003. Evidence for a skeletal mechanosensitivity gene on mouse chromosome 4. FASEB J 17:324-326.
34. Pieper S, Lorensen B, Schroeder W, et al. 2006. The na-mic kit: Itk, vtk, pipelines, grids and 3d slicer as an open platform for the medical image computing community. Proc IEEE Intl Symp Biomed Imaging ISBI 1:698-701.
35. Ramos A, Simoes J. 2006. Tetrahedral versus hexahedral finite elements in numerical modelling of the proximal femur. Med Eng Phys 28:916-924.
36. Donahue TLH, Hull ML, Rashid MM, et al. 2002. A finite element model of the human knee joint for the study of tibio-femoral contact. J Biomech Eng 124:273-280.
37. Tejwani SG, Markolf KL, Benhaim P. 2005. Reconstruction of the interosseous membrane of the forearm with a graft substitute: A cadaveric study. J Hand Surg 30: 326-334.
38. Pfaeffle HJ, Tomaino MM, Grewal R, et al. 1996. Tensile properties of the interosseous membrane of the human forearm. J Orthop Res 14:842-845.