Increased bone formation in rat tibiae after a single short period of dynamic loading in vivo

American Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology and Metabolism

Volumn 270, Issue 3 33-3, 1996, Pages

  Forwood, Mark R ^b   Owan, Ichiro ^b   Takano, Yuichi ^b   Turner, Charles H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b NONE

Author keywords

adaptation; histomorphometry; mechanical stimuli

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; DOSE RESPONSE; FEMALE; LOADING TEST; MECHANICAL STIMULATION; MORPHOMETRICS; NONHUMAN; OSSIFICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; STEM CELL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TIBIA;

EID: 0029919886     PISSN: 01931849     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.1996.270.3.e419     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Akhter, M. P., D. M., Raab, C. H. Turner, and R. R. Recker. Characterization of in vivo strain in the rat tibia during external application of a four-point bending load. J. Biomeck. 25: 1241-1246, 1992.
2. Bowman, B. M., and S. C. Miller. The proliferation and differentiation of the bone-lining cell in estrogen-induced osteogenesis. Bone 7: 351-357, 1986.
3. Burger, E. H., and J. P. Veldhuijzea. Influence of mechanical factors on bone formation, resorption and growth in vitro. In: Bone: Bone Growth-B, edited by B. K. Hall. Boca Raton, FL: CRC, 1993, vol. 7, p. 37-56.
4. Chow, J. W. M., C. J. Jagger, and T. J. Chambers. Characterization of osteogenic response to mechanical stimulation in cancellous bone of rat caudal vertebrae. Am. J. Physiol. 265 (Endocrinol. Metab. 28): E340-E347, 1993.
5. Dobnig, H., and R. T. Turner. Evidence that intermittent treatment with parathyroid hormone increases bone formation in adult rats by activation of bone lining cells. Endocrinology 136: 3632-3638, 1995.
6. El Haj, A. J., L. Minter, S. C. F. Rawlinson, R. Suswillo, and L. E. Lanyon. Cellular responses to mechanical loading in vitro. J. Bone Miner. Res. 5: 923-932, 1990.
7. Forwood, M. R., and C. H. Turner. Response of rat tibiae to incremental loading: a quantum concept for bone formation. Bone 15: 603-609, 1994.
8. Forwood, M. R., and C. H. Turner. Skeletal adaptations to mechanical usage: results from tibial loading studies in rats. Bone 17, Suppl. 4: 197s-205s, 1995.
9. Frost, H. M. A determinant of bone architecture. The minimum effective strain. Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res. 200: 198-225, 1983.
10. 2 Bone 8: 171-178, 1987.
11. Klein-Nulend, J., A. Van Der Plas, C. M. Semeins, N. E. Ajubi, J. A. Frangos, P. J. Nijweide, and E. H. Burger. Sensitivity of osteocytes to biomechanical stress in vitro. FASEB J. 9: 441-445, 1995.
12. Lean, J. M., C. J. Jagger, T. J. Chambers, and J. W. M. Chow. Increased insulin-like growth factor-I mRNA expression in osteocytes precedes the increase in bone formation in response to mechanical stimulation. Am. J. Physiol. 268 (Endocrinol. Metab. 31): E318-E327, 1995.
13. Miller, S. C., and B. M. Bowman. Medullary bone osteogenesis following estrogen administration to mature male Japanese quail. Dev. Biol. 87: 52-63, 1981.
14. Miller, S. C., and W. S. S. Jee. The bone lining cell: a distinct phenotype? Calcif. Tissue Int. 41: 1-5, 1987.
15. Otter, M. W., V. R. Palmieri, D. D. Wu, K. G. Seiz, L. A. MacGintie, and G. V. B. Cochran. Comparative analysis of streaming potentials in vivo and in vitro. J. Orthop. Res. 10: 710-719, 1992.
16. Parfitt, A. M. The quantum concept of bone remodeling and turnover: implications for the pathogenesis of osteoporosis. Calcif. Tissue Int. 28: 1-5, 1979.
17. Parfitt, A. M. The cellular basis of bone remodeling: the quantum concept reexamined in light of recent advances in the cell biology of bone. Calcif. Tissue Int. 36: S37-S45, 1984.
18. Parfitt, A. M. Bone forming cells in clinical conditions. In: Bone: The Osteoblast and the Osteocyte, edited by B. K. Hall. Boca Raton, FL: CRC, 1992, vol. 1, p. 351-429.
19. 3H uridine levels in osteocytes following a single short period of dynamic bone loading in vivo. Calcif. Tissue Int. 43: 92-96, 1988.
20. Pritchard, J. J. The osteoblast. In: The Biochemistry and Physiology of Bone: Structure, edited by G. M. Bourne. New York: Academic, 1971, vol. 1, p. 21-43.
21. Raab-Cullen, D. M., M. A. Thiede, D. N. Peterson, D. B. Kimmel, and R. R. Recker. Mechanical loading stimulates rapid changes in periosteal gene expression. Calcif. Tissue Int. 55: 473-478, 1994.
22. 2, produces similar responses in both G6PD activity and RNA production as mechanical loading, and increases IGF-II release, in adult cancellous bone in culture. Calcif. Tissue Int. 53: 324-329, 1993.
23. Reich, K. M., C. V. Gay, and J. A. Frangos. Fluid shear stress as a mediator of osteoblast cyclic adenosine monophosphate production. J. Cell. Physiol. 143: 100-104, 1990.
24. Roberts, W. E., and E. R. Morey. Proliferation and differentiation sequence of osteoblast histogenesis under physiological conditions in rat periodontal ligament. Am. J. Anat. 174: 105-118, 1985.
25. Salzstein, R. A., and S. R. Pollack. Electromechanical potentials in cortical bone - II. Experimental analysis. J. Biomech. 20: 271-280, 1987.
26. Simmons, D. J., and M. D. Grynpas. Mechanisms of bone formation in vivo. In: Bone: The Osteoblast and the Osteocyte, edited by B. K. Hall. Boca Raton, FL: CRC, 1992, vol. 1, p. 193-302.
27. Turner, C. H., and M. R. Forwood. What role does the osteocyte network play in bone adaptation? Bone 16: 283-285, 1995.
28. Turner, C. H., M. R. Forwood, and M. W. Otter. Mechanotransduction in bone: do bone cells act as sensors of fluid flow? FASEB J. 8: 875-878, 1994.
29. Turner, C. H., M. R. Forwood, J.-Y. Rho, and T. Yoshikawa. Mechanical loading thresholds for lamellar and woven bone formation. J. Bone Miner. Res. 9: 87-97, 1994.
30. Turner, C. H., I. Owan, and Y. Takano. Mechanotransduction in bone: the roles of strain rate and stress-generated fluid flow. Am. J. Physiol. 269 (Endocrinol. Metab. 32): E438-E442, 1995.
31. Weinbaum, S., S. C. Cowin, and Y. Zeng. A model for excitation of osteocytes by mechanical loading induced fluid shear stresses. J. Biomechanics 27: 339-360, 1994.