The use of quantile regression in consumer studies

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 40, Issue PA, 2014, Pages 230-239

  Davino, Cristina ^a   Romano, Rosaria ^b   Næs, Tormod ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MACERATA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALABRIA   (Italy)

^c NOFIMA   (Norway)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Least squares regression; Purchase intent pattern; Quantile regression; Questionnaire data

Indexed keywords

EID: 84911197354     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Asioli D., Næs T., Granli B.S., Almli Lengard V. Consumer preferences for iced coffee determined by conjoint analysis: An exploratory study with Norwegian consumers. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 2014, 49(6):1565-1571. 10.1111/ijfs.12485.
2. 1 norm. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery 1974, 17:319-320.
3. Cade B.S., Noon B.R. A gentle introduction to quantile regression for ecologists. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2003, 1(8):412-420.
4. Carroll J.D. Individual differences and multidimensional scaling. Multidimensional scaling: Theory and application in the behavioural sciences 1972, Vol. 1:105-155. Seminar Press, New York.
5. Davino C., Furno M., Vistocco D. Quantile regression: Theory and applications 2013, Wiley.
6. Efron B., Tibshirani R.J. Introduction to the bootstrap 1998, Chapman & Hall CRC, United States of America.
7. Endrizzi I., Menichelli E., Johansen S.M.B., Olsen N.V., Næs T. Handling of individual differences in conjoint analysis. Food Quality and Preference 2011, 22(3):241-254.
8. Fox M., Rubin H. Admissibility of quantile estimates of a single location parameter. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1964, 35(3):949-1417.
9. Gould W. Quantile regression with bootstrapped standard errors. STATA Technical Bulletin 1992, 19-21.
10. Green P.E., Srinivasan V. Conjoint in consumer research: Issues and outlook. Journal of Consumer Research 1978, 5:103-123.
11. Guinot C., Latreille J., Tenenhaus M. PLS Path modelling and multiple table analysis. Application to the cosmetic habits of women in Ile-de-France. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2001, 58:247-259.
12. Gustafsson A., Hermann A., Huber F. Conjoint measurement: Methods and applications 2007, Springer, Berlin, Germany.
13. Kocherginsky M., He X., Mu Y. Practical confidence intervals for regression quantiles. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 2005, 14(1):41-55.
14. Koenker, R. (2005). Quantile regression. Econometric Society Monographs.
15. Koenker R., Basset G.W. Regression quantiles. Econometrica 1978, 46:33-50.
16. Koenker R., Basset G.W. Tests for linear hypotheses and L1 estimation. Econometrica 1982, 50:43-61.
17. Koenker R., Bassett G.W. Robust tests for heteroscedasticity based on regression quantiles. Econometrica 1982, 50:43-61.
18. Koenker R., d'Orey V. Computing regression quantiles. Applied Statistics 1987, 36:383-393.
19. Koenker R., Hallock V. Quantile regression. Journal of Economic Perspectives 2001, 15:143-156.
20. Martens H., Anderssen E., Flatberg A., Gidskehaug L.H., Høy M., Westad F., et al. Regression of a data matrix on descriptors of both its rows and of its columns via latent variables: L-PLSR. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 2005, 48:103-123.
21. Martens H., Næs T. Multivariate calibration 1983, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester.
22. McEwan J.A. Acceptance mapping for product optimization. Data handling in science and technology 1996, Vol. 16:71-102. Elsevier Science B.V. T. Naes, E. Risvik (Eds.).
23. Menichelli E., Almøy T., Tomic O., Olsen N.V., Næs T. SO-PLS as an exploratory tool for path modelling. Food Quality and Preference 2014, 36:122-134.
24. Menichelli E., Hersleth M., Almøy T., Næs T. Alternative methods for combining information about products, consumers and consumers' acceptance based on path modelling. Food Quality and Preference 2014, 31:142-155.
25. Næs T., Brockhoff P.B., Tomic O. Statistics for sensory and consumer science 2010, Wiley.
26. Næs T., Lengard V., Johansen S.B., Hersleth M. Alternative methods for combining design variables and consumer preference with information about attitudes and demographics in conjoint analysis. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21(4):368-378.
27. Parzen M.I., Wei L., Ying Z. A resampling method based on pivotal estimating functions. Biometrika 1994, 81:341-350.
28. Romano R., Davino C., Næs T. Classification trees in consumer studies for combining both product attributes and consumer preferences with additional consumer characteristics. Food Quality and Preference 2014, 33:27-36.
29. Vigneau E., Charles M., Chen M. External preference segmentation with additional information on consumers: A case study on apples. Food Quality and Preference 2013, 32(A):83-92.
30. Vinzi V.E., Guinot C., Squillacciotti S. Two-step PLS regression for L-structured data: An application in the cosmetic industry. Statistical Methods and Applications 2007, 16(2):263-278.