Decisions regarding resuscitation of the extremely premature infant and models of best interest

Journal of Perinatology

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 193-198

  Leuthner, S R ^a  

^a MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTHORITY; CASE REPORT; FEMALE; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALIZATION; INFANT; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL EXPERT; MODEL; MORALITY; PARENT; PREMATURITY; RESPONSIBILITY; RESUSCITATION; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SOCIETY;

DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, PREMATURE; INTENSIVE CARE, NEONATAL; MALE; PARENTS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; RESUSCITATION; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0034871437     PISSN: 07438346     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.jp.7200523     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Fetus and Newborn. The initiation or withdrawal of treatment for high-risk newborns
2. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Fetus and Newborn and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Committee on Obstetric Practice. Perinatal care at the threshold of viability
3. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Bioethics. Ethics and the care of critically ill infants and children
4. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Bioethics. Guidelines on forgoing life-sustaining medical treatment
5. Deposition of Mark and Karla Miller
6. Deposition of Dr. Jacobs
7. Parental right to determine whether to use aggressive treatment for an early gestational age infant: The Messenger Case
8. For tiniest preemies: Love, anguish and sometimes regret
9. Parents' grand rounds speech on neonatal intensive care unit experience
10. The Long Dying of Baby Andrew
11. Parents of tiny infants find care choices are not theirs
12. A quality of life determined by a baby's size
13. Crimes against the smallest of children
14. US Child Abuse Protection and Treatment Amendments of 1984
15. Neonatologists judge the "Baby Doe" regulations
16. Review of compelled compassion
17. Overtreatment of neonates? A personal retrospective
18. Ethical issues in the nursery: Priorities versus limits
19. Guidelines for the Responsible Utilization of Neonatal Intensive Care. Wisconsin Association for Perinatal Care Position Statement
20. Physicians' neonatal resuscitation of extremely low-birth-weight preterm infants
21. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Bioethics. Informed consent, parental permission and assent in pediatric practice
22. Treating Baby Doe: The Ethics of Uncertainty
23. The Technical Criteria Fallacy
24. Parenting and the best interests of minors
25. Counseling families who have a child with a severe congenital anomaly
26. Ethics and the provision of futile, harmful, or burdensome treatment to children
27. Physician recommendations and patient autonomy: Finding a balance between physician power and patient choice
28. Parents as decision makers for children