The relative impacts of climate and land-use change on conterminous United States bird species from 2001 to 2075

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 11, 2014, Pages

  Sohl, Terry L ^a  

^a U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BIRD; CLIMATE CHANGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENTROPY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL TEMPERATURE; LAND USE; LANDSCAPE; NONHUMAN; NORTH AMERICAN; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIMULATION; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION; ANIMAL; BIODIVERSITY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; PHYSIOLOGY; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALIA; AVES;

ANIMALS; BIODIVERSITY; BIRDS; CLIMATE CHANGE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84910124055     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112251     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Matthews SN, Iverson LR, Prasad AM, Peters MP (2011) Changes in potential habitat of 147 North American breeding bird species in response to redistribution of trees and climate following predicted climate change. Ecography 34: 933-945.
2. Brambilla M, Ficetola GF (2012) Species distribution models as a tool to estimate reproductive parameters: a case study with a passerine bird species. Journal of Animal Ecology 81: 781-787.
3. Root T (1988) Energy constraints on avian distributions and abundances. Ecology 69(2): 330-339.
4. Thogmartin WE, Knutson MG, Sauer JR (2006) Predicting regional abundance of rare grassland birds with a hierarchical spatial count model. The Condor 108: 25-46.
5. Rahbek C, Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK, Entsminger GL, Rangel TF, et al. (2007) Predicting continental-scale patterns of bird species richenss with spatially explicit models. Proceedings of the Royal Society B (274): 165-274.
6. Pearson RG, Dawson TP (2003) Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Global ecology and Biogeography 12: 361-371.
7. Barbet-Massin M, Thuiller W, Jiguet F (2012) The fate of European breeding birds under climate, land-use and dispersal scenarios. Global Change Biology 18: 881-890.
8. Jongsomjit D, Stralberg D, Gardali T, Salas L, Wiens J (2013) Between a rock and a hard place the impacts of climate change and housing development on breeding birds in California. Landscape Ecology 28: 187-200.
9. Watling JI, Bucklin DN, Speroterra C, Brandt LA, Mazzotti FJ, et al. (2013) Validating predictions from climate envelope models. PLoS ONE 8(5): e63600. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063600.
10. Araujo MB, Peterson AT (2012) Uses and misuses of bioclimatic envelope modeling. Ecology 93(7): 1527-1539.
11. Jimenez-Valverde A, Barve N, Lira-Noriega A, Maher SP, Nakazawa Y, et al. (2011) Dominant climate influences on North American bird distributions. Global Ecology and Biogeography 20: 114-118.
12. Thuiller W, Araujo MB, Lavorel S (2004) Do we need land-cover data to model species distributions in Europe? Journal of Biogeography 31: 353-361.
13. Bucklin DN, Basille M, Benscoter AM, Brandt LA, Mazzotti FJ, et al. (2014) Comparing species distribution models constructed with different subsets of environmental predictors. Diversity and Distributions. doi:10.1111/ddi.12247.
14. Lee TM, Jetz W (2011) Unravelling the structure of species extinction risk for predictive conservation science. Proceeding of the Royal Society B(278): 1329-1338.
15. Sinclair SJ, White MD, Newell GR (2010) How useful are species distribution models for managing biodiversity under future climates? Ecology and Society 15(1): 8. [online]. Available: http://www.ecologandsociety.org/vol15/iss1/art8/ .
16. Riordan EC, Rundel PW (2014) Land use compounds habitat losses under projected climate change in a threatened California ecosystem. PLoS ONE 9(1): e86487. doi:10.1371/journal/pone.0086487.
17. Pearson RG, Dawson TP, Liu C (2004) Modelling species distributions in Britain: A hierarchical integration of climate and land-cover data. Ecography 27: 285-298.
18. Sullivan BL, Wood CL, Iliff MJ, Bonney RE, Fink D, et al. (2009) eBird: A citizen-based observation network in the biological sciences. Biological Conservation 142: 2282-2292.
19. Sullivan BL, Aycrigg JL, Barry JH, Bonney RE, Bruns N, et al. (2014) The eBird enterprise: An integrated approach to development and application of citizen science. Biological Conservation 169: 31-40.
20. Hochachka W, Fink D (2012) Broad-scale citizen science data from checklists: prospects and challenges for macroecology. Frontiers of Biogeography 4(4): 150-154.
21. Lerman SB, Nislow KH, Nowak DJ, DeStefano S, King DI, et al. (2014) Using urban forest assessment tools to model bird habitat potential. Landscape and Urban Planning 122: 29-40.
22. Hurlbert AH, Liang Z (2012) Spatiotemporal variation in avian migration phenology: Citizen science reveals effects of climate change. PLoS ONE 7(2): e31662. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0031662.
23. Fink D, Hochachka WM, Zuckerberg B, Winkler DW, Shaby B, et al. (2010) Spatiotemporal exploratory models for broad-scale survey data. Ecological Applications 20(8): 2131-2147.
24. Ridgeby RS, Allnutt TF, Brooks T, McNicol DK, Mehlman DW, et al. (2003) Digital distribution maps of the birds of the Western Hemisphere, version 1.0 NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia USA.
25. Yackulic CB, Chandler R, Zipkin EF, Royle JA, Nichols JD, et al. (2013) Presence-only modeling using MaxEnt: when can we trust the inferences? Methods in Ecology and Evolution 4: 236-243.
26. Elith J, Phillips SJ, Hastie T, Dudik M, Chee YE, et al. (2011) A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Diversity and Distributions 17: 43-57.
27. Kramer-Schadt S, Niedballa J, Pilgrim JD, Schroder B, Lindenborn J (2013) The importance of correcting for sampling bias in MaxEnt species distribution models. Diversity and Distributions 19: 1366-1379.
28. Boria RA, Olson LE, Goodman SM, Anderson RP (2014) Spatial filtering to reduce sampling bias can improve the performance of ecological niche models. Ecological Modelling 275: 73-77.
29. Wisz MS, Hijmans RJ, Li J, Peterson AT, Graham CH, et al. (2008) Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models. Diversity and Distributions 14: 763-773.
30. Hernandez PA, Graham CH, Master LL, Albert DL (2006) The effect of sample size and species characteristics on performance of different species distribution modeling methods. Ecography 29: 773-785.
31. Sohl TL, Sleeter BM, Zhu Z, Sayler KL, Bennett S, et al. (2012) A land-use and land-cover modeling strategy to support a national assessment of carbon stocks and fluxes: Applied Geography 34: 111-124.
32. Sohl TL, Sayler KL, Bouchard MA, Reker RR, Friesz AM, et al. (2014) Spatially explicit modeling of 1992 to 2100 land cover and forest stand age for the conterminous United States. Ecological Applications 24(5): 1015-1036. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/13-1245.1.
33. Nakicenovic N, Alcamo J, Davis G, de Vries HJM, Fenhann J, et al. (2000) Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 570 p.
34. Vogelmann JE, Howard SM, Yang L, Larson CR, Wylie BK, et al. (2001) Completion of the 1990s National Land Cover Data Set for the conterminous United States. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 67: 650-652.
35. Cunningham MA, Johnson DH (2006) Proximate and landscape factors influence grassland bird distributions. Ecological Applications 16(3): 1062-1075.
36. Bakker KK, Naugle DE, Higgins DF (2002) Incorporating landscape attributes into models for migratory grassland bird conservation. Conservation Biology 16(6): 1638-1646.
37. Fearer TM, Prisley SP, Stauffer DF, Keyser PD (2007) A method for integrating the Breeding Bird Survey and Forest Inventory and Analysis databases to evaluate forest bird-habitat relationships at multiple spatial scales. Forest Ecology and Management 243: 128-143.
38. Conlisk E, Syphard AD, Franklin J, Flint L, Flint A, et al. (2013) Uncertainty in assessing the impacts of global change with coupled dynamic species distribution and population models. Global Change Biology 19: 858-869.
39. Hay LE, Markstrom SL, Ward-Garrison C (2011) Watershed-scale response to climate change through the twenty-first century for selected basins across the United States. Earth Interactions 15: 1-37.
40. 2 and climate change on the water cycle and water quality in the semiarid James River Basin of the Midwestern USA. Science of the Total Environment 430: 150-160.
41. Bradley BA, Olsson AD, Wang O, Dickson BG, Pelech L, et al. (2012) Species detection vs. habitat suitability: Are we biasing habitat suitability models with remotely sensed data? Ecological Modelling 244: 57-64.
42. Kery M, Gardner B, Monnerat C (2010) Predicting species distributions from checklist data using site-occupancy models. Journal of Biogeography 37: 1851-1862.
43. Moreno R, Zamora R, Molina JR, Vasquez A, Herrera MA (2011) Predictive modeling of microhabitats for endemic birds in South Chilean temperate forests using Maximum entropy (Maxent). Ecological Informatics 6: 364-370.
44. Johnston KM, Freund KA, Schmitz OJ (2012) Projected range shifting by montane mammals under climate change: implications for Cascadia's National Parks. Ecosphere 3(11): 97. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/ES12-00077. 1.
45. U.S. Geological Survey (1999) USGS 30-Meter Resolution, One-Sixtieth Degree National Elevation Dataset for CONUS, Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center, Sioux Falls, SD.
46. Phillips SJ, Dudik M (2008) Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography 31: 161-175.
47. Bahn V, McGill BJ (2012) Testing the predictive performance of distribution models. Oikos 000: 001-011, doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.00299.x.
48. Phillips SJ, Dudik M, Elith J, Graham CH, Lehmann A, et al. (2009) Sample selection bias and presence-only distribution models: implications for background and pseudo-absence data. Ecological Applications 19(1): 181-197.
49. Dudik M, Schapire RE, Phillips SJ (2005) Correcting sample selection bias in maximum entropy density estimation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 18. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. 320-330.
50. Veloz SD (2009) Spatially autocorrelated sampling falsely inflates measures of accuracy for presence-only niche models. Journal of Biogeography 36: 2290-2299.
51. Elith J, Kearney M, Phillips SJ (2010) The art of modelling range-shifting species. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 1: 330-342.
52. Barve N, Barve V, Jimenez-Valverde A, Lira-Noriega A, Maher AP, et al. (2011) The crucial role of the accessible area in ecological niche modeling and species distribution modeling. Ecological Modelling 222: 1810-1819.
53. VanDerWal J, Shoo LP, Graham C, Williams SE (2009) Selecting pseudoabsence data for presence-only distribution modeling: How far should you stray from what you know? Ecological Modelling 220: 589-594.
54. Anderson RP, Gonzalez Jr. I (2011) Species-specific tuning increases robustness to sampling bias in models of species distributions: An implementation with MaxEnt. Ecological Modelling 222: 2796-2811.
55. Warren DL, Seifert SN (2011) Ecological niche modeling in Maxent: the importance of model complexity and the performance of model selection criteria. Ecological Applications 21(2): 335-342.
56. Syfert MM, Smith MJ, Coomes DA (2013) The effects of sampling bias and model complexity on the predictive performance of MaxEnt species distribution models. PLoS One 8(2): e55158. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055158.
57. Liu C, Berry PM, Dawon TP, Pearson RG (2005) Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distributions. Ecography 28: 385-393.
58. Liu C, White M, Newell G (2013) Selecting thresholds for the prediction of species occurrence with presence-only data. Journal of Biogeography (40): 778-789.
59. Prince K, Lorrilliere R, Barbet-Massin M, Jiguet F (2013) Predicting the fate of French bird communities under agriculture and climate change scenarios. Environmental Science & Policy 33: 120-132.
60. Melles SJ, Fortin MJ, Lindsay K, Badzinski D (2011) Expanding northward: influence of climate change, forest connectivity, and population processes on a threatened species' range shift. Global Change Biology 17: 17-31.
61. Naujokaitis-Lewis IR, Curtis JMR, Tischendorf L, Badzinski D, Lindsay K, et al. (2013) Uncertainties in coupled species distribution-metapopulation dynamics models for risk assessments under climate change. Diversity and Distributions 19: 541-554.
62. Yu J,Wong WK, Hutchinson R (2010) Modeling Experts and Novices in Citizen Science Data for Species Distribution Modeling. Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, (pp. 1157-1162), Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
63. Dickinson JL, Zuckerberg B, Bonter DN (2010) Citizen Science as an Ecological Research Tool: Challenges and Benefits. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 41: 149-172.