Communicating spatial planning decisions at the landscape and farm level with landscape visualization

IForest

Volumn 7, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 434-442

  Warren Kretzschmar, Bartlett ^a   Haaren, Christina Von ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ UNIVERSITY HANNOVER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ecosystem services; Farm scale; Landscape planning; Landscape visualization; MANUELA; Participatory planning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84910086463     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19717458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3832/ifor1175-007     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Al-Kodmany K (1999). Using Visualization Techniques for Enhancing Public Participation in Planning and Design: Process, Participation, and Evaluation. Landscape and Urban Planning 45 (1): 37-45. - doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00024-9
2. Al-Kodmany K (2002). Visualization Tools and Methods in Community Planning: From Freehand Sketches to Virtual Reality. Journal of Planning Literature 17 (2): 189-211. - doi: 10.11 77/088541202762475946
3. Appleton K., Lovett A, Sunnenberg G, Dockerty T (2002). Rural landscape visualization from GIS databases: A comparison of approaches, options and problems. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 26: 141-162. - doi: 10.1016/S01 98-9715(01)00041-2
4. Arciniegas G., Janssen R (2012). Spatial decision support for collaborative land use planning workshops. Landscape and Urban Planning 107 (3): 332-342. - doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012. 06.004
5. Arnstein S (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the Royal Town Planning Institute 35 (4): 216-224. [online] URL: http://lith gow-schmidt.dk/sherry-arnstein/ladder-of-citizen-participation_en.pdf
6. Bailey K., Grossardt T (2009). Toward structured public involvement: justice, geography and collaborative geospatial/geovisual decision support systems. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 100 (1): 57-86. - doi: 10.1080/0004 5600903364259
7. Bishop I.D., Lange E (2005). Visualization in landscape and environmental planning. Technology and applications. Taylor & Francis, London, UK and New York, USA. [online] URL: http://books. google.it/books?id=HDp5AgAAQBAJ
8. Coconu L (2008). Enhanced visualization of landscapes and environmental data with three-dimensional sketches. PhD thesis, Universitat Konstanz, Switzerland, pp. 107.
9. Conrad E., Cassar L, Jone, M, Eiter S, Izaovicova Z, Barankova Z, Christie M, Fazey I (2011). Rheotoric and Reporting of Public Participation in Landscape Policy. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 13 (1): 23-47. - doi: 10.108 0/1523908X.2011.560449
10. DiBiase D, MacEachren AM, Krygier JB, Reeves C (1992). Animation and the role of map design in scientific visualization. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 19 (4): 201-214. - doi: 10.1559/152304092783721295
11. Hoppner C., Frick J, Buchecker M (2007). Assessing psycho-social effects of participatory landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning 83 (2-3): 196-207. - doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan. 2007.04.005
12. IAP2 (2004). IAP2 public participation spectrum. International Association for Public Partecipation, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia, pp. 1. [online] URL: http://www.iap2.org.au/ documents/item/84
13. Kempa D (2012). Bedingungen fur den Einsatz einer Software fur Naturschutzberatung und-dokumentation auf landwirtschaftlichen Betrieben [Requirements for the use of software in nature conservation planning and documentation on farms]. PhD thesis, Institute for Environmental Planning, Leibniz University Hannover, Germany, pp. 65. [in German]
14. Konisky D.M., Beierle TC (2001). Innovations in public participation and environmental decision making. Examples from the Great Lakes region. Society and Natural Resources 14: 815-826. - doi: 10.1080/089419201753210620
15. Lange E (2001). The limits of realism: perceptions of virtual landscapes. Landscape Urban Planning 54: 163-182. - doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)001 34-7
16. Langendorf R (2001). Computer-aided visualization: possibilities for urban design, planning, and management. In: "Planning Support Systems: Integrating Geographic Information Systems, Models, and Visualization Tools" (Brail RK, Klosterman RE eds). ESRI Press, Redlands, CA, pp. 309-359.
17. Lewis J.L., Sheppard SRJ (2006). Culture and communication: can landscape visualization improve forest management consultation with indigenous communities? Landscape and Urban Planning 77 (3): 291-313. - doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005. 04.004
18. Luyet V., Schlaepfer R, Parlange MB, Buttler A (2012). A framework to implement stakeholder participation in environmental projects. Journal of Environmental Management 111: 213-219. - doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.06.026
19. MacEachren A (1994). Some truths with maps: a primer on symbolization and design. Association of American Geographers, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 129.
20. Meitner M.J., Sheppard SRJ, Cavens D, Gandy R, Picard P., Harshaw H, Harrison D (2005). The multiple roles of environmental data visualisation in evaluating alternative forest management strategies. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 49: 192-205. - doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2005. 03.002
21. Nicholson-Cole SA (2005). Representing climate change futures: a critique on the use of images for visual communication. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 29: 255-273. - doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2004.05.002
22. Pettit C., Bishop I, Sposito V, Aurambout JP, Sheth F (2012). Developing a multi-scale visualisation framework for use in climate change response. Landscape Ecology 27: 487-508. - doi: 10.1007/s10980-012-9716-5
23. Reed MS (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biological Conservation 141 (10): 2417-2431. - doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014
24. Reed M.S., Graves A, Dandy N, Posthumus H, Hubacek K., Morris J (2009). Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management 90 (5): 1933-1949. - doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001
25. Salter J.D., Campbell C, Journeay M, Sheppard SRJ (2009). The digital workshop: exploring the use of interactive and immersive visualisation tools in participatory planning. Journal of Environmental Management 90: 2090-2101. - doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.08.023
26. Schroth O (2010). From information to participation. Interactive landscape visualization as a tool for collaborative planning. University Press, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland, pp. 224.
27. Schroth O., Wissen U, Schmid WA (2006). Developing new images of rurality: interactive 3D visualisations for participative landscape planning workshops in the Entlebuch UNESCO biosphere reserve. disP - The Planning Review 42 (166): 26-34. - doi: 10.1080/02513625.2006.105 56960
28. Schroth O., Hayek UW, Lange E, Sheppard SRJ, Schmid WA (2011). Multiple-case study of landscape visualizations as a tool in transdisciplinary planning workshops. Landscape Journal 30 (1): 53-71. - doi: 10.3368/lj.30.1.53
29. Shaw A., Sheppard S, Burch S, Flanders D, Wiek A, Carmichael J, Robinson J, Cohen S (2009). Making local futures tangible's.Synthesizing, downscaling, and visualizing climate change scenarios for participatory capacity building. Global Environmental Change 19 (4): 447-463. - doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.04.002
30. Sheppard SRJ, Cizek P (2009). The ethics of Google Earth: crossing thresholds from spatial data to landscape visualisation. Collaborative GIS for spatial decision support and visualization. Journal of Environmental Management 90 (6): 2102-2117. - doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007. 09.012
31. Sheppard SR (2001). Guidance for crystal ball gazers: developing a code of ethics for landscape visualization. Landscape and Urban Planning 54 (1-4): 183-199. - doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(01) 00135-9
32. Sheppard SRJ (2005). Landscape visualisation and climate change: the potential for influencing perceptions and behavior. Mitigation and adaptation strategies for climate change. Environmental Science and Policy 8 (6): 637-654. - doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2005.08.002
33. Sheppard SRJ (2012). Visualizing climate change - a guide to visual communication of climate change and developing local solutions. Routledge, London, UK, pp 511.
34. Soliva R., Hunziker M (2009). Beyond the visual dimension: using ideal type narratives to analyse people's assessments of landscape scenarios. Land Use Policy 26: 284-294. - doi: 10.1016/ j.- landusepol.2008.03.007
35. st century - methods for digital techniques. In: "Digital Landscape Architecture 2010" (Buhmann E, Pietsch M, Kretzler E eds). Wichmann Verlag, VDE Verlag GmbH, Berlin and Offenbach, Germany, pp. 2-26.
36. Tress B., Tress G (2003). Scenario visualisation for participatory landscape planning'a study from Denmark. Landscape and Urban Planning 64 (3): 161-178. - doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(02) 00219-0
37. von Haaren C, Warren-Kretzschmar B (2006). The interactive landscape plan: use and benefits of new technologies in landscape planning and discussion of the interactive landscape plan in Koenigslutter am Elm, Germany. Landscape Research 31:83-105 - doi: 10.1080/014263905004 48625
38. von Haaren C, Oppermann B, Friese KI, Hachmann R., Meiforth J, Neumann A, Tiedtke S, Warren-Kretzschmar B, Wolter FE (2005). Interaktiver Landschaftsplan Konigslutter am Elm [Interactive landscape plan Koenigslutter am Elm]. Naturschutz und Biologische Vielfalt 24, Bonn Bad Godesberg, Germany, pp. 269. [in German]
39. von Haaren C, Kempa D, Vogel K, Ruter S (2012). Assessing biodiversity on the farm scale as basis for ecosystem service payments. Journal of Environmental Management 113: 40-50. - doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.07.033
40. Warren-Kretzschmar B, Tiedtke S (2005). What role does visualization play in communication with citizens? A field study from the interactive landscape plan. In: "Trends in Real-Time Landscape Visualization and Participation" (Buhmann E, Paar P, Bishop ID, Lange E eds). Herbert Wichmann Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 156-167.
41. Warren-Kretzschmar B (2007). Visualisierungen in der interaktiven Landschaftsplanung einsetzen: Spektrum der technischen Moglichkeiten und Anwendungesbeispiele [Using visualization in landscape planning: spectrum of technical opportunities and examples]. In: "Leitfaden zur interacktiven Landscaftsplanung [Guidelines for Interactive Planning]". Bundesamt fur Naturschutz, Bonn - Bad Godesberg, Germany, pp. 32. [in German]
42. Warren-Kretzschmar B (2011). Visualization in landscape planning: choosing appropriate visualzation methods for public participation. PhD Thesis, Architektur und Landschaft, Leibniz Universitat Hannover, Germany, pp. 293. [online] URL: http://edok01.tib.uni-hannover.de/ edoks/e01dh11/672472341.pdf
43. Wiedemann I., Femers S (1993). Public participation in waste management decision making: analysis and management of conflicts. Journal of Hazardous Materials 33 (3): 355-368. - doi: 10.1016/0304-3894(93)85085-S