Effects of communication between judges on consensus and accuracy in judgments of people's intelligence

European Journal of Psychological Assessment

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 274-282

  Borkenau, Peter ^a   Leising, Daniel ^b   Fritz, Ulrike ^a  

^a MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

^b DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Consensus; Group; Intelligence; Judgment

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909601279     PISSN: 10155759     EISSN: 21512426     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000188     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Beer, A. (2013). Group personality judgments at zero acquaintance: Communication among judges versus aggregation of independent evaluations. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 385-389. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2013.03.008
2. Biesanz, J. C. (2010). The social accuracy model of interpersonal perception: Assessing individual differences in perceptive and expressive accuracy. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45, 853-885. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2010.519262
3. Borkenau, P., & Liebler, A. (1993). Convergence of stranger ratings of personality and intelligence with self-ratings, partner ratings, and measured intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 546-553. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.65.3.546
4. Borkenau, P., & Liebler, A. (1994). Effects of communication among judges on the validity of their judgments. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 10, 10-14.
5. Borkenau, P., Mauer, N., Riemann, R., Spinath, F. M., & Angleitner, A. (2004). Thin slices of behavior as cues of personality and intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 599-614. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.4.599
6. Bosker, R. J., Snijders, T. A. B., & Guldemond, H. (2003). PINT (Power IN Two-level designs): Estimating standard errors of regression coefficients in hierarchical linear models for power calculations. Retrieved from http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~snijders/Pint21-UsersManual.pdf
7. Cattell, R. B. (1971). Abilities: Their structure, growth, and action. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
8. Connelly, B. S., & Ones, D. S. (2010). An other perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers' accuracy and predictive validity. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1092-1122. doi: 10.1037/a0021212
9. Echambadi, R., & Hess, J. D. (2007). Mean centering does not alleviate collinearity problems in moderated multiple regression models. Marketing Science, 26, 438-445. doi: 10.1287/mksc.1060.0263
10. Funder, D. C. (1995). On the accuracy of personality judgment: A realistic approach. Psychological Review, 102, 652-670. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.102.4.652
11. Horn, W. (1983). Leistungsprüfsystem. Handanweisung (2nd ed.) [Performance Test System]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
12. Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
13. Kuncel, N. R., Hezlett, S. A., & Ones, D. S. (2004). Academic performance, career potential, creativity, and job performance: Can one construct predict them all? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 148-161. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.148
14. Lehrl, S. (2005). Mehrfachwahl-Wortschatz-Intelligenztest [Multiple-choice vocabulary intelligence test]. Balingen, Germany: Spitta.
15. Leising, D., & Borkenau, P. (2011). Person perception, dispositional inferences, and social judgment. In L. M. Horowitz & S. Strack (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic interventions (pp. 157-170). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
16. Lu, L., Yuan, Y. C., & McLeod, P. L. (2012). Twenty-five years of hidden profiles in group decision making: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 54-75. doi: 10.1177/1088868311417243
17. Oswald, W. D., & Roth, E. (1987). Zahlen-Verbindungs-Test [Digit linking test] (2nd ed.). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
18. Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., & Congdon, R. (2010). HLM7: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modelling [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
19. Rindermann, H., & Neubauer, A. C. (2000). Information-sverarbeitungsgeschwindigkeit und Schulerfolg: Weisen basale Maße der Intelligenz prädiktive Validität auf [Speed of information processing and success at school: Do basal measures of intelligence have predictive validity]? Diagnostica, 46, 8-17. doi: 10.1026//0012-1924.46.1.8
20. Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater-reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 2, 420-428. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420
21. Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467-1478. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1467
22. Sternberg, R. J. (1987). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23. Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
24. Vernon, P. A. (1993). The Zahlen-Verbindungs-Test and other trail making correlates of general intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 35-40.
25. West, S. G., Ryu, E., Kwok, O., & Cham, H. (2011). Multilevel modeling: Current and future applications in personality research. Journal of Personality, 79, 2-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00681.x