The social accuracy model of interpersonal perception: Assessing individual differences in perceptive and expressive accuracy

Multivariate Behavioral Research

Volumn 45, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 853-885

  Biesanz, Jeremy C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78549255961     PISSN: 00273171     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2010.519262     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Albright, L., Kenny, D. A., & Malloy, T. E. (1988). Consensus in personality judgments at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 387-395.
2. Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1993). Half a minute: Predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of nonverbal behavior and physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64,431-441.
3. Bates, D., & Sarkar, D. (2007). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes (R package version 0.9975-12) [Computer software]. Retrieved January 15, 2009, from http://cran.r-project.org
4. Bauer, D. J., Preacher, K. J., & Gil, K. M. (2006). Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 11, 142-163.
5. Biesanz, J. C. (2007, October). Explorations in componential analyses of interpersonal perception data. Cattell Award address presented at the Society of Multivariate Experimental Psychology, Chapel Hill, NC.
6. Biesanz, J. C. (2009, September). The social accuracy model of interpersonal perception: Assessing individual differences in perceptive and expressive accuracy. Paper presented at the Society of Multivariate Experimental Psychology, Salishan, OR.
7. Biesanz, J. C., Deeb-Sossa, N., Papadakis, A. A., Bollen, K. A., & Curran, P. J. (2004). The role of coding time in estimating and interpreting growth curve models. Psychological Methods, 9, 30-52.
8. Biesanz, J. C., & Human, L. J. (2010). The cost of forming more accurate impressions: Accuracy motivated perceivers see the personality of others more distinctively but less normatively. Psychological Science, 21, 589-594.
9. Biesanz, J. C., Paquin, A., Sarracino, J., Human, L. J., Chan, M., & Gillis, R. (2010). Are we aware of when our first impressions are accurate? Manuscript in preparation.
10. Biesanz, J. C., & West, S. G. (2000). Personality coherence: Moderating self-other profile agreement and profile consensus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 425-437.
11. Biesanz, J. C., West, S. G., & Graziano, W. G. (1998). Moderators of self-other agreement: Reconsidering temporal stability in personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 467-477.
12. Biesanz, J. C., West, S. G., & Millevoi, A. (2007). What do you learn about someone over time? The relationship between length of acquaintance and consensus and self-other agreement in judgments of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 119-135.
13. Blackman, M. C., & Funder, D. C. (1998). The effect of information on consensus and accuracy in personality judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 164-181.
14. Borkenau, P., & Liebler, A. (1992). Trait inferences: Sources of validity at zero acquaintance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 645-657.
15. Borkenau, P., & Zaltauskas, K. (2009). Effects of self-enhancement on agreement on personality profiles. European Journal of Personality, 23, 107-123.
16. Browne, W. J., Goldstein, H., & Rasbash, J. (2001). Multiple membership multiple classification (MMMC) models. Statistical Modeling, 1, 103-124.
17. Carlson, E. N., & Furr, R. M. (2009). Evidence of differential meta-accuracy: People understand the different impressions they make. Psychological Science, 20, 1033-1039.
18. Chan, M., Rogers, K., Parisotto, K. L., & Biesanz, J. C. (2010). Forming first impressions: The role of gender and normative accuracy in personality perception. Manuscript submitted for publication
19. Colvin, C. R. (1993a). Childhood antecedents of young-adult judgability. Journal of Personality, 61, 611-635.
20. Colvin, C. R. (1993b). Judgable people: Personality, behavior, and competing explanations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 861-873.
21. Colvin, C. R., & Bundick, M. J. (2001). In search of the good judge of personality: Some methodological and theoretical concerns. In J. A. Hall & F. J. Bernieri (Eds.), Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and measurement (pp. 47-65). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Cronbach, L. J. (1955). Process affecting scores on understanding of others and assumed similarity. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 177-193.
23. Cronbach, L. J. (1958). Proposals leading to analytic treatment of social perception scores. In R. Tagiuri & L. Petrullo (Eds.), Person perception and interpersonal behavior (pp. 353-379). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
24. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.
25. Davis, M. H., & Kraus, L. A. (1997). Personality and empathic accuracy. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Empathic accuracy (pp. 144-168). New York: Guilford.
26. Edwards, A. L. (1957). The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research. New York: Dryden.
27. Funder, D. C. (1987). Errors and mistakes: Evaluating the accuracyof social judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 75-90.
28. Funder, D. C. (1991). Global traits: A neo-Allportian approach to personality. Psychological Science, 2,31-39.
29. Funder, D. C. (1995). On the accuracy of personality judgment: A realistic approach. Psychological Review, 102, 652-670.
30. Funder, D. C. (1999). Personality judgment: A realistic approach to person perception. San Diego, CA: Academic.
31. Funder, D. C. (2001). Three trends in current research on person perception: Positivity, realism, and sophistication. In J. Hall & F. Bernieri (Eds.), Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory, measurement and applications (pp. 319-331). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Funder, D. C., & West, S. G. (Eds.). (December, 1993). Viewpoints on personality: Consensus, self other agreement and accuracy in judgments of personality [Special Issue]. Journal of Personality, 61(4).
33. Furr, R. M. (2008). A framework for profile similarity: Integrating similarity, normativeness, and distinctiveness. Journal of Personality, 76, 1267-1316.
34. Furr, R. M. (2009). Profile analysis in person-situationintegration. Journal of Researchin Personality, 43,196-207.
35. Gage, N. L., & Cronbach, L. J. (1955). Conceptual and methodological problems in interpersonal perception. Psychological Review, 62, 411-422.
36. Gilbert, D. T. (1998). Ordinary personology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 89-150). New York: McGraw-Hill.
37. Gill, P. S., & Swartz, T. B. (2001). Statistical analyses for round robin interaction data. The Canadian Journal of Statistics, 29, 321-331.
38. Gill, P. S., & Swartz, T. B. (2007). Bayesian analysis of dyadic data. American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences, 27, 73-92.
39. Hall, J. A. (2001). The PONS test and the psychometric approach to measuring interpersonal sensitivity. In J. A. Hall & F. J. Bernieri (Eds.), Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and measurement (pp. 143-160). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Hall, J. A., Andrzejewski, S. A., Murphy, N. A., Schmid Mast, M., & Feinstein, B. A. (2008). Accuracy of judging others' traits and states: Comparing mean levels across tests. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1476-1489.
41. Hall, J. A., & Bernieri, F. J. (Eds.). (2001). Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and measurement. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Holleran, S. E., & Mehl, M. R. (2009, July). The accuracy of personality judgments at zero acquaintance: A meta-analysis using realistic, everyday environments. Poster presented at the Association for Research in Personality, Evanston, IL.
43. Human, L. J. (2009). The role of adjustment in accurate interpersonal impressions Unpublished master's thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
44. Human, L. J., & Biesanz, J. C. (2010). The role of adjustment in expressive accuracy: The good target or the good self judge? Unpublished manuscript.
45. Human, L. J., & Biesanz, J. C. (in press). Through the looking glass clearly: The role of adjustment in accuracyand assumed similarity in first impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
46. Human, L. J., Biesanz, J. C., Parisotto, K. L., & Dunn, E. W. (2010). Your best self reveals your true self: Trying to make a good impression results in more accurate impression. Manuscript submitted for publication.
47. Ickes, W. (Ed.). (1997). Empathic accuracy. New York: Guilford.
48. John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102-138). New York: Guilford.
49. Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York: Guilford.
50. Kenny, D. A. (1998). SOREMO: A FORTRAN program for the analysis of round robin data structures [Computer software]. Storrs: University of Connecticut.
51. Kenny, D. A., & Albright, L. (1987). Accuracy in interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 390-402.
52. Kenny, D. A., Korchmaros, J. D., & Bolger, N. (2003). Lower level mediation in multilevel models. Psychological Methods, 8, 115-128.
53. Kenny, D. A., & LaVoie, L. (1984). The social relations model. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 18, pp. 142-182). San Diego, CA: Academic.
54. Kenny, D. A., West, T. V., Malloy, T. E., & Albright, L. (2006). Componential analysis of interpersonal perception data. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 282-294.
55. Kenny, D. A., & Winquist, L. A. (2001). The measurement of interpersonal sensitivity: Consideration of design, components, and unit of analysis. In J. A. Hall & F. J. Bernieri (Eds.), Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and measurement (pp. 265-302). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
56. Kenrick, D. T., & Funder, D. C. (1988). Profiting from controversy:Lessons from the person-situation debate. American Psychologist, 43, 23-34.
57. Kreft, I. G. G., & de Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
58. Kreft, I. G. G., de Leeuw, J., & Aiken, L. S. (1995). The effect of different forms of centering in hierarchical linear models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 1-21.
59. Lorenzo, G. L., Biesanz, J. C., & Human, L. J. (in press). What is beautiful is good and more accurately understood: Physical attractiveness and accuracy in first impressions of personality. Psychological Science.
60. MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1, 173-181.
61. Magnusson, D., & Törestad, B. (1993). A holistic view of personality: A model revisited. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 427-452.
62. McArthur, L. Z., & Baron, R. M. (1983). Toward an ecological theory of social perception. Psychological Review, 90, 215-238.
63. McDonald, R. P. (1981). Constrained least squares estimates of oblique common factors. Psychometrika, 46, 337-341.
64. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13-103). New York: Macmillan.
65. Norman, W. T., & Goldberg, L. R. (1966). Raters, ratees, and randomness in personality structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 681-691.
66. Olson, J. M., Roese, N. J., & Zanna, M. P. (1996). Expectancies. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 211-238). New York: Guilford.
67. Paulhus, D. L. (2009). [Social desirability of personality measures]. Unpublished raw data
68. R Development Core Team. (2009). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved January 15, 2009, from http://www.R-project.org
69. Shen, W., & Louis, T. A. (1999). Empirical Bayes estimation via the smoothing by roughening approach. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 8, 800-823.
70. Skowronski, J., & Ambady, N. (Eds.). (2008). First impressions. New York: Guilford.
71. Steiger, J. H. (2006a, June). Things we could have known: Some thoughts on seeing the future and avoiding regret in data analysis and model selection. Keynote address, International Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Montreal, QB, CA.
72. Steiger, J. H. (2006b, October). Things we could have known: Some thoughts on seeing the future and rediscovering the past in data analysis and model selection. Presidential address, Society of Multivariate Experimental Psychology, Lawrence, KS.
73. Swann, W. (1984). Quest for accuracy in person perception: A matter of pragmatics. Psychological Review, 91, 457-477.
74. Warner, R. M., Kenny, D. A., & Stoto, M. (1979). A new round-robin analysis of variance for social interaction data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1742-1757.
75. Wong, G. Y. (1982). Round robin analysis of variance via maximum likelihood. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77, 714-724.
76. Wood, D., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2007). Normality evaluations and their relation to personality traits and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 861-879.