Computer-aided trauma simulation system with haptic feedback is easy and fast for oral-maxillofacial surgeons to learn and use

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Volumn 72, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 1984-1993

  Schvartzman, Sara C ^a   Silva, Rebeka ^b   Salisbury, Ken ^a   Gaudilliere, Dyani ^c   Girod, Sabine ^c  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

^b SAN FRANCISCO VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDENTULOUSNESS; FRACTURE REDUCTION; HUMAN; LIKERT SCALE; MANDIBLE FRACTURE; MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY; SIMULATOR; TACTILE FEEDBACK; VIRTUAL REALITY; ANATOMIC LANDMARK; CEPHALOMETRY; CHIN; COMPUTER INTERFACE; EDUCATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; JAW DISEASE; MANDIBLE; MANDIBLE CONDYLE; METHODOLOGY; ORAL SURGERY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PHYSIOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RADIOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TIME; TOUCH; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANATOMIC LANDMARKS; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CEPHALOMETRY; CHIN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEEDBACK; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MANDIBLE; MANDIBULAR CONDYLE; MANDIBULAR DISEASES; MANDIBULAR FRACTURES; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; QUESTIONNAIRES; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SURGERY, ORAL; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TOUCH; TREATMENT OUTCOME; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84909592242     PISSN: 02782391     EISSN: 15315053     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.05.007     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Zinser MJ, Mischkowski RA, Dreiseidler T, et al: Computer-assisted orthognathic surgery:Waferless maxillary positioning, versatility, and accuracy of an image-guided visualisation display. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 51:827, 2013
2. Benazzi S, Senck S: Comparing 3-dimensional virtual methods for reconstruction in craniomaxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69:1184, 2011
3. Hsu SS, Gateno J, Bell RB, et al: Accuracy of a computer-aided surgical simulation protocol for orthognathic surgery: A prospective multicenter study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 71:128, 2013
4. Liu XZ, Shu DL, Ran W, et al: Digital surgical templates for managing high-energy zygomaticomaxillary complex injuries associated with orbital volume change: A quantitative assessment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 71:1712, 2013
5. Orentlicher G, Goldsmith D, Horowitz A: Applications of 3-dimensional virtual computerized tomography technology in oral and maxillofacial surgery: Current therapy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68:1933, 2010
6. Schendel SA, Jacobson R, Khalessi S: 3-Dimensional facial simulation in orthognathic surgery: Is it accurate? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 71:1406, 2009
7. Tucker S, Cevidanes LH, Styner M, et al: Comparison of actual surgical outcomes and 3-dimensional surgical simulations. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68:2412, 2010
8. Bell RB: Computer planning and intraoperative navigation in orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69:592, 2011
9. Sallnäs EL, Rassmus-Gröhn K, Sjöström C: Supporting presence in collaborative environments by haptic force feedback. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 7:461, 2000
10. Forsslund J, Chan S, Selesnick J, et al: The effect of haptic degrees of freedom on task performance in virtual surgical environments. Stud Health Technol Inform 184:129, 2012
11. Murray DJ, Edwards G, Mainprize JG, et al: Optimizing craniofacial osteotomies: Applications of haptic and rapid prototyping technology. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 66:1766, 2008
12. Wang Q, Chen H,WuW, et al: Real-time mandibular angle reduction surgical simulation with haptic rendering. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 16:1105, 2012
13. Singapogu RB, Smith DE, Long LO, et al: Objective differentiation of force-based laparoscopic skills using a novel haptic simulator. J Surg Educ 69:766, 2012
14. Panait L, Akkary E, Bell RL, et al: The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic simulation training. J Surg Res 156:312, 2009
15. Whyms BJ, Vorperian HK, Gentry LR, et al: The effect of computed tomographic scanner parameters and 3-dimensional volume rendering techniques on the accuracy of linear, angular, and volumetric measurements of the mandible. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 115:682, 2013
16. MacLean K: Haptic interaction design for everyday interfaces. Rev Hum Factors Ergon, 2008
17. Han X, Wan H: Transactions on Edutainment, IV Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6250:229, 2010
18. Morris D, Sewell C, Barbagli F, et al: Visuohaptic simulation of bone surgery for training and evaluation. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 26:48, 2006
19. Cao CG, Zhou M, Jones DB, et al: Can surgeons think and operate with haptics at the same time? J Gastrointest Surg 11:1564, 2007
20. Zhou M, Tse S, Derevianko A, et al: Effect of haptic feedback in laparoscopic surgery skill acquisition. Surg Endosc 26:1128, 2012
21. Ruspini DC, Kolarov K, Khatib O: The haptic display of complex graphical environments, in SIGGRAPH'97: Conf. on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques; 1997. 345
22. B. Zilles AC, Salisbury JK: A constraint-based god-object method for haptic display, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS '95), Vol. 3.Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society, 1995. 3146
23. Chan S, Conti F, Blevins NH, et al: Constraint-based six degree-of-freedom haptic rendering of volume-embedded isosurfaces. World Haptics. IEEE Computer Society, 2004. 84
24. Olsson P, Nysjo F, Hirsch JM, et al: A haptics-assisted craniomaxillofacial surgery planning system for restoring skeletal anatomy in complex trauma cases. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 8: 887, 2013
25. Ullrich S, Knott T, LawYC, et al: Influence of the bimanual frame of reference with haptics for unimanual interaction tasks in virtual environments, in Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI '11). Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society, 2011. 39
26. Schlickum MK, Hedman L, Enochsson L, et al: Systematic video game training in surgical novices improves performance in virtual reality endoscopic surgical simulators: A prospective randomized study. World J Surg 33:2360, 2009
27. Weller R: New Geometric Data Structures for Collision Detection and Haptics, Springer Series on Touch and Haptic Systems, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01020-5-2
28. Polushin I, Xiaoping P, Lung C-L: Stability of bilateral teleoperators with generalized projection-based force reflection algorithms. Automatica 48:1005, 2012
29. Truppe M, Schicho K, Kawana H, et al: Perspectives of teleconsultation in craniomaxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69:808, 2011