The selective attention for identification model (SAIM): A framework for closing the gap between the behavioural and neurological levels

Computational Modelling in Behavioural Neuroscience: Closing the Gap Between Neurophysiology and Behaviour

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 80-106

  Heinke, Dietmar ^a   Mavritsaki, Eirini ^a   Backhaus, Andreas ^a   Kreyling, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909151387     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203889541     Document Type: Chapter

References (32)

1. Amari, S. I. (1977). Dynamics of pattern formation in lateral-inhibition type neural fields. Biological Cybernetics, 27, 77-87.
2. Backhaus, A., Heinke, D., & Humphreys, G. W. (2005). Contextual learning in the selective attention for identification model (CL-SAIM): Modeling contextual cueing in visual search tasks. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Computer Society conference on computer vision and pattern recognitione (CVPR'05): 3rd international workshop on attention and performance in computer vision (WAPCV'05), San Diego, CA. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
3. Daugman, J. G. (1988). Complete discrete 2-D Gabor transforms by neural networks for image analysis and compression. IEEE Transaction on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 36(7), 1169-1179.
4. Deco, G., & Rolls, E. T. (2005). Neurodynamics of biased competition and cooperation for attention: A model with spiking neurons. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94, 295-313.
5. Deco, G., & Zihl, J. (2001). Top-down selective visual attention: A neurodynamical approach. Visual Cognition, 8(1), 119-140.
6. Driver, J., Baylis, G. C., & Rafal, R. D. (1992). Preserved figure-ground segmentation in visual matching. Nature, 360, 73-75.
7. Duncan, J. (1980). The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 272-300.
8. Gainotti, G., d'Erme, P., Monteleone, D., & Silveri, M. C. (1986). Mechanisms of unilateral spatial neglect in relation to laterality of cerebral lesions. Brain, 109, 599-612.
9. Gerstner, W., & Kistler, W. M. (2002). Spiking neuron models: Single neurons, populations, plasticity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Gonzalez, R., & Woods, R. E. (2002). Digital image processing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
11. Häusser, M., & Mel, B. (2003). Dendrites: Bug or feature? Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13(3), 372-383.
12. Heinke, D., Backhaus, A., Sun, Y., & Humphreys, G. W. (2008). The selective attention for identification model (SAIM): Simulating visual search in natural colour images. In L. Paletta & E. Rome (Eds.), Attention in cognitive systems (pp. 143-172). Berlin:Springer-Verlag, LNAI 4840.
13. Heinke, D., Deco, G., Zihl, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (2002a). A computational neuroscience account of visual neglect. Neurocomputing, 44, 811-816.
14. Heinke, D., & Gross, H. M. (1993). A simple selforganizing neural network architecture for selective visual attention. In Proceedings of the international conference on artificial neural network - icann'93 (pp. 63-66). Amsterdam: Springer Verlag.
15. Heinke, D., & Humphreys, G. W. (1997). SAIM: A model of visual attention and neglect. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on artificial neural networks -icann'97 (pp. 913-918). Lausanne, Switzerland: Springer Verlag.
16. Heinke, D., & Humphreys, G. W. (2003). Attention, spatial representation and visual neglect: Simulating emergent attention and spatial memory in the selective attention for identification model (SAIM). Psychological Review, 110(1), 29-87.
17. Heinke, D., & Humphreys, G. W. (2005a). Computational models of visual selective attention: A review. In G. Houghton (Ed.), Connectionist models in psychology (pp. 273-312). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
18. Heinke, D., & Humphreys, G. W. (2005b). Selective attention for identification model: Simulating visual neglect. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 100 (1-2), 172-197.
19. Heinke, D., Humphreys, G. W., & diVirgilo, G. (2002b). Modeling visual search experiments: Selective attention for identification model (SAIM). Neurocomputing, 44, 817-822.
20. Heinke, D., Humphreys, G. W., & Tweed, C. L. (2006). Top-down guidance of visual search: A computational account. Visual Cognition, 14(4/5/6/7/8), 985-1005.
21. Heinke, D., Sun, Y. R., & Humphreys, G. W. (2005). Modeling grouping through interactions between top-down and bottom-up processes: The grouping and selective attention for identification model (G-SAIM). In L. Paletta, J. K. Tsotsos, E. Rome, & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Attention and performance in computational vision, 2nd international workshop (WAPCV'04), Prague, Czech Republic, May 15, 2004 (pp. 148-158). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
22. Hopfield, J. J. (1984). Neurons with graded response have collective computational properties like those of two-state neurons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 81, 3088-3092.
23. Hopfield, J. J., & Tank, D. (1985). "Neural" computation of decisions in optimization problems. Biological Cybernetics, 52, 141-152.
24. Humphreys, G. W., & Heinke, D. (1998). Spatial representation and selection in the brain: Neuropsychological and computational constraints. Visual Cognition, 5(1/2), 9-7.
25. Marshall, J. C., & Halligan, P. W. (1994). The yin and yang of visuo-spatial neglect: A case study. Neuropsychologia, 32, 1037-1057.
26. Mavritsaki, E., Heinke, D., Deco, G., & Humphreys, G. W. (2006). A computational model of visual marking using an interconnected network of spiking neurons: The spiking search over time & space model (sSoTS). Journal of Physiology, Paris, 100- (1/2/3), 110-124.
27. Mjolsness, E., & Garrett, C. (1990). Algebraic transformations of objective functions. Neural Networks, 3, 651-669.
28. Mozer, M. C., Halligan, P. W., & Marshall, J. C. (1997). The end of the line for a braindamaged model of unilateral neglect. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9(2), 171-190.
29. Mozer, M. C., & Sitton, M. (1998). Computational modeling of spatial attention. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 341-393). London: Psychology Press.
30. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531-556). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31. Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1988). Parallel distributed processing. Explorations in the microstructure of cognition: Vol. 1. Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Shipp, S. (2004). The brain circuitry of attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(5), 223-229.