Modeling grouping through interactions between top-down and bottom-up processes: The Grouping and Selective Attention for Identification model (G-SAIM)

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Volumn 3368, Issue , 2005, Pages 148-158

  Heinke, Dietmar ^a   Sun, Yaoru ^a   Humphreys, Glyn W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER NETWORKS; FEATURE EXTRACTION; IDENTIFICATION (CONTROL SYSTEMS); OBJECT RECOGNITION;

FLEXIBLE SYSTEMS; GROUPING PROCESSES; PIXELS; SELECTIVE ATTENTION FOR IDENTIFICATION MODELS (SAIM);

SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

EID: 24144503344     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30572-9_11     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. D. Heinke and G. W. Humphreys. Attention, spatial representation and visual neglect: Simulating emergent attention and spatial memory in the Selective Attention for Identification Model (SAIM). Psychological Review, 110(1):29-87, 2003.
2. K. M. Heilman and E. Valenstein. Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect. Annals of Neurology, 5:166-170, 1979.
3. D. Heinke and G. W. Humphreys. Computational Models of Visual Selective Attention: A Review. In G. Houghton, editor, Connectionist Models in Psychology. Psychology Press, in press.
4. M. C. Mozer and M. Sitton. Computational modeling of spatial attention. In H. Pashler, editor, Attention, pages 341-393. London:Psychology Press, 1998.
5. G. W. Humphreys and H. J. Müller. SEarch via Recursive Rejection (SERR): A Connectionist Model of Visual Search. Cognitive Psychology, 25:43-110, 1993.
6. J. M. Wolfe. Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1(2):202-238, 1994.
7. G. Deco and J. Zihl. Top-down selective visual attention: A neurodynamical approach. Visual Cognition, 8(1):119-140, 2001.
8. S. E. Palmer. Vision Science - Photons to Phenomenology. The MIT Press, 1999.
9. J. Driver, G. Davis, C. Russell, M. Turatto, and E. Freeman. Segmentation, attention and phenomenal visual objects. Cognition, 80:61-95, 2001.
10. J. Duncan and G. W. Humphreys. Visual Search and Stimulus Similarity. Psychological Review, 96(3):433-458, 1989.
11. J. J. Hopfield and D.W. Tank. "Neural" Computation of Decisions in Optimazation Problems. Biological Cybernetics, 52:141-152, 1985.
12. Shun-ichi Amari. Dynamics of Pattern Formation in Lateral-Inhibition Type Neural Fields. Biological Cybernetics, 27:77-87, 1977.
13. E. Mjolsness and C. Garrett. Algebraic Transformations of Objective Functions. Neural Networks, 3:651-669, 1990.
14. S. Grossberg, E. Mingolla, and W. D. Ross. A Neural Theory of Attentive Visual Search: Interactions of Boundary, Surface, Spatial and Object Representation. Psychological Review, 101:470-489, 1994.
15. I. Gilchrist, G. W. Humphreys, and M. J. Riddoch. Grouping and Extinction: Evidence for Low-Level Modulation of Selection. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13:1223-1256, 1996.
16. B. Olshausen, C. H. Anderson, and D. C. Van Essen. A Multiscale Dynamic Routing Circuit for Forming Size-and Position- Invariant Object Representations. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 2:45-62, 1995.