Selective attention for identification model: Simulating visual neglect

Computer Vision and Image Understanding

Volumn 100, Issue 1-2 SPEC. ISS., 2005, Pages 172-197

  Heinke, Dietmar ^a   Humphreys, Glyn W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Attention; Computational modeling

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; INTEGRATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

ATTENTION; COMPUTATIONAL MODELING;

COMPUTER VISION;

EID: 24944447044     PISSN: 10773142     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cviu.2004.10.010     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. M. Behrmann, and C. Haimson The cognitive neuroscience of visual attention Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 9 1999 158 163
2. M. Behrmann, and S.P. Tipper Object-based attentional mechanisms: evidence from patients with unilateral neglect C. Umilta M. Moscovitch Attention and performance XV 1994 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
3. K.R. Cave, and J. Wolfe Modeling the role of Parallel Processing in Visual Search Cognit. Psychol. 22 1990 225 257
4. A.D. Costello, and E.K. Warrington The dissociation of visual neglect and neglect dyslexia J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 50 1987 1110 1116
5. R. Cubelli, P. Nichelli, V. Bonito, A. DeTanti, and M.G. Inzaghi Different patterns of dissociation in unilateral neglect Brain Cogn. 15 1991 139 159
6. G. Deco, and J. Zihl Top-down selective visual attention: a neurodynamical approach Visual Cogn. 8 1 2001 119 140
7. J. Driver, G.C. Baylis, and R.D. Rafal Preserved figure-ground segmentation in visual matching Nature 360 1992 73 75
8. J. Driver, and P.W. Halligan Can visual neglect operate in object-centred co-ordinates? An affirmative single case study Cogn. Neuropsychol. 8 1991 475 496
9. J. Duncan The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli Psychol. Rev. 87 1980 272 300
10. R. Ellis, and G.W. Humphreys Connectionist psychology: A text with readings 1999 Psychology Press London
11. M.T. Figueiredo J. Zerubia A.K. Jain Energy minimization methods in computer vision and pattern recognition: Third international workshop 2001 Springer Verlag Heidelberg
12. G. Gainotti, P. d'Erme, D. Monteleone, and M.C. Silveri Mechanisms of unilateral spatial neglect in relation to laterality of cerebral lesions Brain 109 1986 599 612
13. D. Heinke, and G.W. Humphreys Attention, spatial representation and visual neglect: simulating emergent attention and spatial memory in the Selective Attention for Identification Model (SAIM) Psychol. Rev. 110 1 2003 29 87
14. D. Heinke, and G.W. Humphreys Computational models of visual selective attention: a review G. Houghton Connectionist Models in Psychology 2005 Psychology Press Hove, England 273 312
15. D. Heinke, and G.W. Humphreys SAIM: a model of visual attention and neglect Proc. 7th Internat. Conf. on Artificial Neural Networks-ICANN'97 1997 Springer Verlag Lausanne, Switzerland 913 918
16. D. Heinke, G.W. Humphreys, and G. diVirgilo Modeling visual search experiments: Selective Attention for Identification Model (SAIM) J.M. Bower Neurocomputing 2002 817 822
17. J.J. Hopfield Neurons with graded response have collective computational properties like those of two-state neurons Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81 1984 3088 3092
18. J.J. Hopfield, and D. Tank "Neural" computation of decisions in optimization problems Biol. Cybern. 52 1985 141 152
19. G.W. Humphreys Neural representation of objects in space: a dual coding account Philos. Trans. R. Soc. 353 1998
20. G.W. Humphreys, and D. Heinke Representing and attending to visual space: a computational perspective on neuropsychological problems 4th neural computation and psychology workshop connectionist representations: Theory and practice 1997 University of London England 99 112
21. G.W. Humphreys, and D. Heinke Spatial representation and selection in the brain: neuropsychological and computational constraints Visual Cogn. 5 1/2 1998 9 47
22. G.W. Humphreys, and H.J. Müller Search via recursive rejection (SERR): a connectionist model of visual search Cogn. Psychol. 25 1993 43 110
23. G.W. Humphreys, and M.J. Riddoch Attention to within-object and between-object spatial representations: multiple side for visual selection Cogn. Neuropsychol. 11 2 1994 207 241
24. G.W. Humphreys, and M.J. Riddoch Separate coding of space within and between perceptual objects: evidence from unilateral visual neglect Cogn. Neuropsychol. 12 1995 283 312
25. M. Husain, and C. Kennard Visual neglect associated with frontal lobe infarction J. Neurol. 243 1996 652 657
26. H. Karnath, P. Schenkel, and B. Fischer Trunk orientation as the determining factor of the 'contralesional' deficit in the neglect syndrome and as the physical anchor of the internal representation of body orientation in space Brain 114 1991 1997 2014
27. C. Koch, and L. Itti Computational modelling of visual attention Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2 2001 194 203
28. J.C. Marshall, and P.W. Halligan The yin and yang of visuo-spatial neglect: a case study Neuropsychologia 32 1994 1037 1057
29. E. Mjolsness, and C. Garrett Algebraic transformations of objective functions Neural Netw. 3 1990 651 669
30. M. Mozer The perception of multiple objects: A connectionist approach 1991 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
31. M.C. Mozer Do attention and perception require multiple reference frames? Evidence from a computational model of unilateral neglect Proceedings of the twenty first annual conference of the cognitive science society 1999 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Hillsdale, NJ 456 461
32. M.C. Mozer, P.W. Halligan, and J.C. Marshall The end of the line for a brain-damaged model of unilateral neglect J. Cogn. Neurosci. 9 2 1997 171 190
33. M.C. Mozer, and M. Sitton Computational modeling of spatial attention H. Pashler Attention 1998 Psychology Press London 341 393
34. B. Olshausen, C.H. Anderson, and D.C. Van Essen A multiscale dynamic routing circuit for forming size-and position-invariant object representations J. Comput. Neurosci. 2 1995 45 62
35. B.A. Olshausen, C.H. Anderson, and D.C. Van Essen A neurobiological model of visual attention and invariant pattern recognition based on dynamic routing of information J. Neurosci. 13 11 1993 4700 4719
36. H.R. Phaf, A. Van Der Heijden, and P. Hudson SLAM: A connectionist model for attention in visual selection tasks Cogn. Psychol. 22 1990 273 341
37. M.I. Posner, and Y. Cohen Components of visual orienting Attention Perform. 1984 531 556
38. W.H. Press Numerical recipes in C: The art of scientific computing 1992 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
39. M.J. Riddoch, and G.W. Humphreys The effect of cueing on unilateral neglect Neuropsychologia 21 1983 589 599
40. M.J. Riddoch, G.W. Humphreys, E. Burroughs, L. Luckhurst, A. Bateman, and S. Hill Cueing in a case of neglect-modality and automaticity effects Cogn. Neuropsychol. 12 1995 605 621
41. M.J. Riddoch, G.W. Humphreys, E. Burroughs, L. Luckhurst, A. Bateman, and S. Hill "Paradoxical neglect": spatial representations, hemisphere-specific activation and spatial cueing Cogn. Neuropsychol. 12 1995 569 604
42. I. Robertson, and J.C. Marshall Unilateral neglect: Clinical and experimental studies 1993 Psychology Press London
43. D.E. Rumelhart, McClelland, Parallel Distributed Processing; Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition; Volume 1: Foundations, A Bradford Book, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1988.
44. S.P. Tipper, and M. Behrmann Object-centered not scene-based visual neglect J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 22 1996 1261 1278
45. J.K. Tsotsos, S.M. Culhane, W.Y.K. Wai, Y. Lai, N. Davis, and F. Nuflo Modeling visual attention via selective tuning Artif. Intell. 78 1995 507 545
46. R. Walker Spatial and object-based neglect Neurocase 1 1995 371 383
47. J.M. Wolfe Guided Search 2.0. A revised model of visual search Psychon. Bull. Rev. 1 2 1994 202 238
48. J.M. Wolfe, P. O'Neill, and S.C. Bennett Why are there eccentricity effects in visual search? Visual and attentional hypotheses Percept. Psychophys. 60 1 1998 140 156
49. A.W. Young, D.J. Hellawell, and J. Welch Neglect and visual recognition Brain 112 1992 51 71
50. A.W. Young, F. Newcombe, and A.W. Ellis Different impairments contribute to neglect dyslexia Cogn. Neuropsychol. 8 1991 177 192