The impact of ICT in education policies on teacher practices and student outcomes in Hong Kong

Assessing the Effects of ICT in Education: Indicators, Criteria and Benchmarks for International Comparisons

Volumn 9789264079786, Issue , 2010, Pages 143-164

  Law, Nancy ^a   Lee, Yeung ^a   Yuen, H K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909070646     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1787/9789264079786-en     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. Catts, R. and Lau, J. (2008). Towards information literacy indicators. Paris: Unesco. Retrieved 17.08.09 from http://www.uis.unesco.org/template/pdf/cscl/InfoLit.pdf.
2. CERI (2001). What schools for the future. Paris: OECD.
3. Curriculum Development Council (CDC) (2001). Learning to learn - The way forward in curriculum. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government Printing.
4. European Council (2000). Lisbon European Council 23 and 24 March 2000, Presidency conclusions. Lisbon: European Parliament. Retrieved 17.08.08 from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/lis1-en.htm.
5. EC (Education Commission) (2000). Learning for life, learning through life: reform proposals for the education system in Hong Kong, Hong Kong: Education Commission. Hong Kong SAR Government. Retrieved 17.08.09, from http://www.edb.gov.hk/FileManager/EN/Content-4079/overview-e.pdf.
6. EDB (2008). Right technology at the right time for the right task. Hong Kong: Education Bureau (EDB), Hong Kong SAR Government.
7. EMB (1998). Information technology for learning in a new era: Five-year strategy 1998/99 to 2002/03. Hong Kong: Education and Manpower Bureau, Hong Kong SAR Government. Retrieved 17.08.09 from http://www.edb.gov.hk/index.aspx?langno=1&nodeID=425.
8. EMB (2004). Empowering learning and teaching with information technology. Hong Kong: Education and Manpower Bureau, Hong Kong SAR Government. Retrieved 17.08.09 from http://www.edb.gov.hk/index.aspx?langno=1&nodeID=2497.
9. Educational Testing Service (ETS) (2003). Succeeding in the 21st century: What higher education must do to address the gap in information and communication technology proficiencies. Princeton: NJ.
10. Jakobs, K. (1999). Information technology standards and standardization: A global perspective. IGI Global.
11. Law, N. and Chow, A. (2008a). 'Pedagogical orientations in mathematics and science and the use of ICT', in N. Law, W. J. Pelgrum and T. Plomp (eds), Pedagogy and ICT in schools around the world: Findings from the SITES 2006 study, 121-179. Hong Kong: CERC and Springer.
12. Law, N. and Chow, A. (2008). 'Teacher characteristics, contextual factors, and how these affect the pedagogical use of ICT', in: N. Law, W. J. Pelgrum and T. Plomp (eds), Pedagogy and ICT in schools around the world: Findings from the SITES 2006 study. Hong Kong: CERC and Springer.
13. Law, N., Lee, M. W. and Chan, A. (in press). 'Policy impacts on pedagogical practice and ICT use: An exploration of the results from SITES 2006'. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.
14. Law, N., Yuen, A., Shum, M. and Lee, Y. (2007). 'Final report on Phase (II) study on evaluating the effectiveness of the 'Empowering learning and teaching with information technology' strategy (2004/07)'. Retrieved 23.07.09 from http://www.edb.gov.hk/index.aspx?langno=1&nodeID=6363.
15. Lee, Y. (2009). 'An investigation of 21st century skills in innovative pedagogical practices using technology'. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hong Kong.
16. Lennon, M., Kirsch, I., Von Davier, M., Wagner, M. and Yamamoto, K. (2003). 'Feasibility study for the PISA ICT literacy assessment. Report to network A', a joint project of ACER, ETS, NIER. Paris: OECD. Retrieved 17.08.09 from http://www.pisa.oecd.org/dataoecd/35/13/33699866.pdf.
17. Morrison, G. R. and Ross, S. M. (1998). 'Evaluating technology-based processes and products', in: R. S. Anderson and B. W. Speck (eds), Changing the way we grade student performance: Classroom assessment and the new learning paradigm, 69-77. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
18. Moskal, B. M. (2000). 'Scoring rubrics: What, when, and how?' Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation Vol. 7, No 3. Retrieved 23.07.06 from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=3.
19. NCREL. (2003). 'enGauge 21st century skills: Literacy in the digital age' [electronic version]. Retrieved 08.01.06 from http://www.ncrel.org/engauge/skills/indepth.htm.
20. OECD. (2005). 'Definition and selection of key competencies - Executive summary' [electronic version]. Retrieved 16.06.06 from http://www.deseco.admin.ch/bfs/deseco/en/index/02.html.
21. Pal, L. A. (2001). Beyond policy analysis - Public issue management in turbulent times. (2nd ed). Scarborough (Ontario): Nelson.
22. Pelgrum, W. J. and Anderson, R. E. (eds). (1999). ICT and the emerging paradigm for life-long learning. Amsterdam: IEA.
23. Popham, J. W. (2003). Test better, teach better: The instructional role of assessment. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
24. Quellmalz, E., Schank, P., Hinojosa, T. and Padilla, C. (1999). 'Performance assessment links in science', Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, Vol. 6, No 10, 1998-1999.
25. Quellmalz, E. and Kozma, R. (2003). 'Designing assessments of learning with technology', Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, Vol. 10, No 3, 389-407.
26. Singapore Ministry of Education (1997). Masterplan for IT in education: 1997- 2002. Retrieved 17.08.09 from http://www.moe.gov.sg/edumall/mpite/index.html.
27. Singapore Ministry of Education (1998). Learning to think: Thinking to learn. Singapore: Author.
28. Unesco (2008). ICT competency standards for teachers: Policy framework. Paris: Unesco.
29. US Department of Education. (1996). Getting America's students ready for the 21st century: meeting the technology literacy challenge. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Offi ce.
30. Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.