Implications of new learning technologies for adult literacy and learning

Review of Adult Learning and Literacy: Connecting Research, Policy, and Practice: A Project of National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 109-156

  Stites, Regie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909048345     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410610485     Document Type: Chapter

References (89)

1. Apple Computer. (2001). Apple Classrooms of Tomorrow library. Retrieved from http://www.apple.com/education/k12/leadership/acot/library.html
2. Ba, H., Culp, K. M., Green, L., Henriquez, A., & Honey, M. (2001). Effective technology use in low-income communities: Research review for the America Connects Consortium. New York: Center for Children and Technology. Retrieved from http://www.americaconnects.net/research/default.asp?subid=25
3. Baker, E. L. (1998). Understanding educational quality: Where validity meets technology. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Retrieved from http://www.ets.org/research/pic/angoff5.pdf
4. Baker, E. L., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Computer-based assessment of problem solving. Computers in Human Behavior, 15, 269-282.
5. Bangert-Drowns, R. I. (1993). The word processor as an instructional tool: A meta-analysis of word processing in writing instruction. Review of Educational Research, 28, 69-93.
6. Becker, H. J. (2000). Who's wired and who's not: Children's access to and use of computer technology. Future of Children, 10(2), 44-75. Retrieved from http://www.futureofchildren.org/pubs-info2825/pubs-info.htm?doc_id=69787
7. Becker, H. J., Ravitz, J., & Wong, Y. (1999). Teacher and teacher-directed student use of computers and software (Teaching Learning and Computing: 1998 National Survey, Rep. No. 3). Irvine, CA: University of California at Irvine, Center for Research in Information Technology in Organizations.
8. Bennett, R. E., Goodman, M., Hessinger, H., Kahn, H., Ligget, J., Marshall, G., & Zack, J. (1999). Using multimedia in large-scale computer-based testing programs. Computers in Human Behavior, 15, 283-294.
9. Berenfield, B. (1993). A moment of glory in San Antonio: A global lab story. Hands On! 16(2). Retrieved from http://globallab.terc.edu/visitors/GLGlory%20in%20San%20Antonio.pdf
10. Bermudez, A. E., & Palumbo, D. (1994). Bridging the gap between literacy and technology: Hypermedia as a learning tool for limited English proficient students. Journal of Educational Issues of Language Minority Students, 14, 165-184. Retrieved from http://www.ncbe.gwu.edu/miscpubs/jeilrns/vol14/bermudez.htm
11. Bingman, B., & Stein, S. (2001). Results that matter: An approach to program quality using Equipped for the Future. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.
12. Bransford, J. D., Franks, J. J., Vye, N. J., & Sherwood, R. D. (1989). New approaches to instruction: Because wisdom can't be told. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 470-497). New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with interesting implications. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education (Vol. 24, pp. 61-101). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
14. Bruce, B. C. (2002). New technologies and social change: Learning in a global cyberage. In L. Bresler and A. Ardichvili (Eds.), Research in international education. New York: Peter Lang. Retrieved from http://www.lis.uiuc.edu/~chip/pubs/02intl.shtml
15. California State University Institute. (1999). Standards for creating multimedia learning modules for low literacy and limited English proficient learners. Retrieved from http://www.cyberstep.org/papers/index.html
16. Center for Innovative Learning Technologies. (n.d.). About CILT. Retrieved April 8, 2003, from http://www.cilt.concord.org/about/
17. Chow, C., Ellis, J., Mark, J., & Wise, B. (1998). Impact of CTCNet Affiliates: Findings from a national survey of users of community technology centers. Newton, MA: Education Development Center. Retrieved from http://www.ctcnet.org/impact98.htm
18. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1992). The Jasper Series as an example of anchored instruction: Theory, program description, and assessment data. Educational Psychologist, 27(3), 291-315.
19. Coughlin, E., & Lemke, C. (1999). Professional competency continuum: Professional skills for the digital age classroom. Milken Exchange on Educational Technology. Retrieved from http://www.mff.org/publications/publications.taf?page=159
20. Cyberstep. (1999). Evaluation of cyber products: Involvement of technology users in product development. Retrieved from http://www.cyberstep.org/papers/index.html
21. Dooley, K. E. (1999). Toward a holistic model for the diffusion of educational technologies: An integrative review of educational integration studies. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 2(4). Retrieved from http://ifets.ieee.org/periodical/vol_4_99/kim_dooley.html
22. English for All. (2002). What is English for All. Retrieved April 9, 2003, from http://www.myefa.org/login.cfm?fuseaction=learnmore2
23. Fletcher-Flinn, C. M., & Gravatt, B. (1995). The efficacy of computer assisted instruction (CAI): A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, 219-242.
24. Gunn, C. (1998). Inservice to practice: A professional development technology project. In S. McNeil, J.-D. Price, S. Boger-Mehall, B. Robin, & J. Wills (Eds.), SITE 98: Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Teacher Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 421075)
25. Hope, W. (1997). Resolving teachers' concerns about microcomputer technology. Computers in the Schools, 13(3/4), 147-160.
26. Hopey, C. E. (1998). Technology, basic skills, and adult education: Getting ready and moving forward. Columbus, OH: Center on Education and Training for Employment, Ohio State University.
27. Hopey, C. E., Harvey-Morgan, J., & Rethemeyer, R. K. (1996). Technology and adult literacy: Findings from a national survey on technology use in adult literacy programs (NCAL Tech. Rep. No. TR96-12). Philadelphia: National Center on Adult Literacy, University of Pennsylvania.
28. International Society for Technology in Education. (2001). Proposed educational computing and technology facilitation initial endorsement rubric. Retrieved from http://cnets.iste.org/review/FACRUB.htm
29. Internet Software Consortium. (n.d.). Internet Software Consortium (ISC) Web site. Retrieved August 27, 2002, from http://www.isc.org
30. Internet Software Consortium. (2002). ISC domain survey. Retrieved August 27, 2002, from http://isc.org/ds/WWW-200201/index.html
31. Johnston, J., & Petty, L. I. (2001). Adult education in nonclassroom settings: A pilot test in Pennsylvania using Workplace Essential Skills. Ann Arbor, MI: Design and Evaluation Services for Education.
32. Johnston, J., & Young, S. J. (1999). LiteracyLink pilot test, fall 1998. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.
33. Johnston, J., Young, S. J., & Petty, L. I. (2001). National field test of workplace essential skills. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Institute for Social Research.
34. Jones, B. F., Valdez, G., Nowakowski, J., & Rasmussen, C. (n.d.). Plugging in: Choosing and using educational technology. Washington, DC: Council for Educational Research and Development.
35. Kim, D., & Penuel, W. (2000). Technology access and learning opportunities in community technology centers: A study of promising practices and organizational challenges. Unpublished manuscript, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA.
36. Kirkman, C. (1993). Computer experience and attitudes of 12-year-old students: Implications for the UK National Curriculum. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 9, 51-62.
37. Knowles, M. (1990). The adult learner: A neglected species (4th ed.). Houston, TX: Gulf.
38. Kulik, J. A. (1994). Meta-analytic studies of findings on computer-based instruction. In E. L. Baker & O'Neil, Jr., H. F. (Eds.), Technology assessment in education and training (pp. 9-33). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39. Kulik, C. C., & Kulik, J. A. (1991). Effectiveness of computer based instruction: An updated analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 75-94.
40. Lazarus, W., & Mora, F. (2000). Online content for low-income and underserved Americans: The digital divide's new frontier. Santa Monica, CA: Children's Partnership. Retrieved from http://www.childrenspartnership.org/pub/low_income/index.html
41. Lin, X., Hmelo, C., Kinzer, C. K., & Secules, T. J. (1999). Designing technology to support reflection. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(3), 43-62.
42. Means, B., & Olson, K. (1995). Technology and education reform: Technical research report. Volume 1: Findings and conclusions. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
43. Milken Family Foundation. (2000). The PCC assessment tool. Retrieved April 9, 2003, from http://www.mff.org/publications
44. Millar, D. (1996). The use of educational software in adult literacy programs: A comparison of integrated learning systems and stand-alone software. Retrieved from http://www.nald.ca/FULLTEXT/edsoft/cover.htm
45. Murnane, R. J., & Levy, F. (1996). Teaching the new basic skills: Principles for educating children in a changing economy. New York: Martin Kessler.
46. National Center on Adult Literacy. (1999). International roundtable on the lifelong learning and new technologies gap: Reaching the disadvantaged, Philadelphia, December 8-10, 1999 (Preliminary report). Philadelphia: National Center on Adult Literacy, International Literacy Institute, Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania.
47. National Public Radio/Kaiser/Kennedy School of Government. (1999). Survey shows widespread enthusiasm for high technology: Americans love their computers and the Internet: "Digital divide" still exists, but there is good news, too. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/programs/specials/poll/technology/
48. National Research Council. (1999a). Being fluent with information technology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
49. National Research Council. (1999b). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
50. National Research Council (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
51. National Telecommunications and Information Administration. (1995). Falling through the net: A survey of the "have nots" in rural and urban America. Retrieved from http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fallingthru.html
52. National Telecommunications and Information Administration. (1998). Falling through the net II: New data on the digital divide. Retrieved from http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/net2/
53. National Telecommunications and Information Administration. (1999). Falling through the net: Defining the digital divide. Retrieved from http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fttn99/contents.html
54. National Telecommunications and Information Administration. (2000). Falling through the net: Toward digital inclusion. Retrieved from http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fttn00/contents00.html
55. National Telecommunications and Information Administration. (2002). A nation online: How Americans are expanding their use of the Internet. Retrieved from http://digitaldivide.gov/reports.htm
56. New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60-92.
57. Office of Technology Assessment. (1993). Adult literacy and new technologies: Tools for a lifetime. Washington, DC: Author.
58. The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education. (1991-1995). Computer supported intentional learning environments. Retrieved April 8, 2003, from http://csile.oise.utornoto.ca
59. Oshima, J., Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Collaborative learning processes associated with high and low conceptual progress. Instructional Science, 24, 125-155.
60. Owston, R. (1997). The World Wide Web: A technology to enhance teaching and learning? Educational Researcher, 28(2), 27-33.
61. Parr, J. M. (2000). A review of the literature on computer-assisted learning, particularly integrated learning systems, and outcomes with respect to literacy and numeracy. Auckland, New Zealand: Ministry of Education. Retrieved from http://www.minedu.govt.nz/web/document/document_page.cfm?id=5499
62. PBS LiteracyLink. (1998, 2001). Workplace Essential Skills: How to get started with free Web-based lessons. Retrieved April 9, 2003, from http://www.pbs.org/literacy.wes/view_wes.html
63. PBS LiteracyLink. (1998, 2001). About LiteracyLink. Retrieved April 9, 2003, from http://lilink.ket.org/about/iphtml
64. Pellegrino, J.W., Hickey, D., Heath, A., Rewey, K., & Vye, N. J. (1992). Assessing the out-comes of an innovative instructional program: The 1990-1991 implementation of "The Adventures of Jasper Woodbury." Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University, Learning Technology Center.
65. Penuel, B. (2001). Designs for learning: Structuring opportunity in community technology centers. [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.techsoup.org/articlepage.cfm?ArticleId=331&topicid=12
66. President's Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology. (1997). Report to the president on the use of technology to strengthen K-12 education in the United States. Retrieved from http://www.ostp.gov/PCAST/k-12ed.html
67. Roschelle, J. M., & Pea, R. D. (1999). Trajectories from today's WWW to a powerful educational infrastructure. Educational Researcher, 8(5), 22-25.
68. Roschelle, J. M., Pea, R. D., Hoadley, C. P., Gordin, D. N., & Means, B. (2000). Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies. Future of Children, 10(2), 76-101. Retrieved from http://www.futureofchildren.org/pubs-info2825/pubs-info.htm?doc_id=69787
69. Rosen, D. J. (2000). Using electronic technology in adult literacy education. In J. Comings, B. Garner, & C. Smith (Eds.), The annual review of adult learning and literacy (Vol. 1, pp. 304-315). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
70. Ryser, G. R., Beeler, J. E., & McKenzie, C. M. (1995). Effects of a Computer-Supported Intentional Learning Environment (CSILE) on students' self-concept, self-regulatory behavior, and critical thinking ability. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13(4), 375-385.
71. Sabatini, J. P. (2001). Designing multimedia learning systems for adult learners: Basic skills with a workforce emphasis (NCAL Working Paper No. WP00-01). Philadelphia: National Center on Adult Literacy, Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania.
72. Sabatini, J. P., Daniels, M., Ginsburg, L., Limeul, K., Russell, M., & Stites, R. (2000). Teacher perspectives on the adult education profession: National survey findings about an emerging profession (NCAL Tech. Rep. No. TR00-02). Philadelphia: National Center on Adult Literacy, Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania.
73. Sacramento County Office of Education. (n.d.). Cyberstep: Learning anytime, anyplace, any pace. Retrieved April 9, 2003, from http://www.cyberstep.org/about/index.html
74. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., & Brett, C. (1992). Educational applications of a networked communal database. Interactive Learning Environments, 2, 45-71.
75. Schiefflin, B. B., & Ochs, E. (Eds.). (1986). Language socialization across cultures. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
76. Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
77. Software and Information Industry Association. (2000). 2000 research report on the effectiveness of technology in schools. Washington, DC: Author.
78. Stites, R. (1998). Adult learning theory: An argument for technology. In C. E. Hopey (Ed.), Technology, basic skills, and adult education: Getting ready and moving forward (pp. 51-57). Columbus, OH: Center on Education and Training for Employment, Ohio State University. Retrieved from http://ericacve.org/majorpubs2.asp?ID=9
79. Stites, R., Hopey, C. E., & Ginsburg, L. (1998). Assessing lifelong learning technology (ALL-TECH): A guide for choosing and using technology for adult learning (NCAL Tech. Rep. PG98-01). Philadelphia: National Center on Adult Literacy, Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved from http://www.literacy.org/pubs.html
80. TERC. (2001). Global Lab: An integrated science project. Retrieved April 9, 2003, from http://globallab.terc.edu/visitors/brochure.html
81. Thomas, A. M., & Buck, M. P. (1994). Analysis of integrated learning systems and their use in adult basic education programs in British Columbia. Victoria, British Columbia: Ministry of Skills, Training, and Labor. Retrieved from http://www.nald.ca/fulltext/pat/anaBC/cover.htm
82. Turow, J. (1999). The Internet and the family: The view from parents, the view from kids (Rep. Series No. 33). Philadelphia: Annenberg Public Policy Center. Retrieved from http://www.appcpenn.org/internet/family/
83. Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
84. Wagner, D. A., & Hopey, C. (1998). Literacy, electronic networking, and the Internet (ILI Tech. Rep. No. TR98-10). Philadelphia: International Literacy Institute, National Center on Adult Literacy, Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania.
85. Wartella, E., O'Keefe, B., & Scantlin, R. (2000). Children and interactive media: A compendium of current research and directions for the future. New York: Markle Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.markle.org/news/_news_incresearch.stm
86. Wentworth, N. (1998). Technology inservice: A powerful change force. In SITE 98: Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Teacher Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 42110)
87. Wilson, M., Draney, K., & Kennedy, C. (2001). GradeMap [computer software]. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Evaluation and Assessment Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
88. Wilson, M., & Sloane, K. (2000). From principles to practice: An embedded assessment system. Applied Measurement in Education, 13(2), 181-208.
89. Wrigley, H. S. (2001). Principles and indicators to assist in the development and evaluation of technology-based materials: A design framework for multimedia development in adult literacy. Retrieved from http://www.cyberstep.org/papers/index.html