Towards a holistic model for the diffusion of educational technologies: An integrative review of educational innovation studies

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 52-66

  Dooley, Kim E ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Diffusion*Innovation*Computer technology*Change in Schools

Indexed keywords

EID: 1242352310     PISSN: 14364522     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (58)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS] (1990). Science for all Americans, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2. Anadam, K. & Kelly, J. T. (1981). Evaluating the use of technology in education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 10 (1), 21-31.
3. Babbie, E. (1989). The practice of social research, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
4. Barron, A. E. & Orwig, G. W. (1993). New technologies for education, Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
5. Boyd, V. (1992). School context: Bridge or barrier for change, Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
6. Chesler, M., Schmuck, R. A. & Lippitt, R. (1975). The principal's role in facilitating innovation. In J. V. Baldridge & T. E. Deal (Eds.) Managing Change in Educational Organizations, Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing Corporation, 321-327.
7. Clinton, W. J. & Gore, A. (1993). Technology for America's economic growth, a new direction to build economic strength, February, Washington, DC: The White House.
8. Corbett, H. D., Dawson, J. & Firestone, W. (1984). School context and school change: Implications for effective planning, Philadelphia, PA: Research for Better Schools.
9. Cuban, L. (1988). A fundamental puzzle of school reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 69 (5), 341-344.
10. Dalton, D. W. (1989). Computers in the schools: A diffusion/adoption perspective. Educational Technology, 29 (11), 20-27.
11. Deal, T. E., Meyer, J. W. & Scott, W. R. (1975). Organizational influences on educational innovation. In J. V. Baldridge & T. E. Deal (Eds.) Managing Change in Educational Organizations, Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing Corporation, 109-132.
12. Dede, C. (1989). The evolution of distance learning: Technology-mediated interactive learning, Office of Technology Assessment, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
13. Dexter, S. L., Anderson, R. E. & Becker, H. J (1999). Teachers' views of computers as catalysts for changes in their teaching practice. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31 (3), 221-239.
14. Dooley, K. E. (1995). The diffusion of computer technology and telecommunications: A comparative case study of middle schools in the Texas Education Collaborative. Unpublished dissertation, College Station, TX: Texas A&M University.
15. Dusick, D. M. (1998). What social cognitive factors influence faculty members' use of computers for teaching? A literature review. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31 (2), 123-137.
16. Dyrli, O. E. & Kinnaman, D. E. (1994a). Gaining access to technology: First step in making a difference for your students. Technology & Learning, 14 (4), 16-20, 48, 50.
17. Dyrli, O. E. & Kinnaman, D. E. (1994b). Integrating technology into your classroom curriculum. Technology & Learning, 14 (5), 38-42, 44.
18. Dyrli, O. E. & Kinnaman, D. E. (1994c). Moving from successful classrooms to successful schools. Technology & Learning, 14 (6), 46-48, 50, 52, 54.
19. Dyrli, O. E. & Kinnaman, D. E. (1994d). Preparing for the integration of emerging technologies. Technology & Learning, 14 (8), 92, 94, 96, 98, 100.
20. Erlandson, D. A., Harris, E. L., Skipper, B. L. & Allen, S. D. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
21. Fidler, L. A. & Johnson, J. D. (1984). Communication and innovation implementation. Academy of Management Review, 9 (4), 704-711.
22. Fullan, M. G. (1985). Change processes and strategies at the local level. The Elementary School Journal, 85 (3), 391-422.
23. Hall, G. E. & Hord, S. M. (1987). Change in schools, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
24. Hall, G. E., Wallace, R. C., & Dossett, W. A. (1973). A developmental conceptualization of the adoption process within educational institutions, Austin, TX: Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, The University of Texas.
25. Hannafin, M. J., Dalton, D. W. & Hooper, S. R. (1987). Computers in education. In E. E. Miller & M. L. Mosley (Eds.) Educational media and technology yearbook, Littleton, CO: Libraries Unlimited, 5-20.
26. Havelock, R. G. (1971). Planning for innovation through dissemination and utilization of knowledge, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.
27. Hefzallah, I. M. (1990). The educated person. In I. M. Hefzallah (Ed.) The new learning and telecommunications technologies: Their potential applications in education, Springfield, IL: Charles Thomas, 5-23.
28. Herbig, P. A. & Kramer, H. (1994). The effect of information overload on the innovation choice process. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 11 (2), 45-54.
29. Huff, S. L. (1987). Computing as innovation. Business Quarterly, Summer, 7-9.
30. Hunter, B. (1993). NSF's networked testbeds inform innovation in science education. T.H.E. Journal, 21 (3), 96-99.
31. Kurshan, B. (1991). Creating the global classroom for the 21st century. Educational Technology, 31 (4), 47-50.
32. Latham, G. (1988). The birth and death cycles of educational innovations. Principal, 68 (1), 41-43.
33. Lee, I. & Reigeluth, C. M. (1994). Empowering teachers for new roles in a new educational system. Educational Technology, 34 (1), 61-72.
34. Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
35. Lipham, J. M. (1977). The administrator's role in educational linkage. In N. Nash & J. Culbertson (Eds.) Linking processes in educational improvement: Concepts and application, Columbus, OH: University Council for Educational Administration, 149-188.
36. Madian, J. (1990). In the midst of restructuring, our only hope is a knowledgeable teacher. Electronic Learning, 9 (6), 8-9.
37. Newlove, B. W. & Hall, G. E. (1976). A manual for assessing open-ended statements of concern about an innovation, Austin: Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, The University of Texas. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 144207).
38. Norton, P. & Gonzales, C. (1998). Regional educational technology assistance initiative - Phase II: Evaluating a model for statewide professional development. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31 (1), 25-48.
39. Office of Technology Assessment (1989). Linking for learning: A new course for education, (OTA Publication No. SET-430), Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
40. Office of Technology Assessment (1995). Teachers and technology: Making the connection, (OTA Publication No. 052-003-01409-2), Pittsburg, PA: Superintendent of Documents.
41. Parr, J. M. (1999). Extending educational computing: A case of extensive teacher development and support. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31 (3), 280-291.
42. Pearlman, R. (1991). Restructuring with technology: A tour of schools where it's happening. Technology & Learning, 11 (4), 30-34, 36.
43. Perkins, D. N. (1991). Technology meets constructivism: Do they make a marriage? Educational Technology, 31 (5), 18-23.
44. Purkey, S. C. & Smith, M. S. (1983). Effective schools: A review. The Elementary School Journal, 83 (4), 427-452.
45. Reif, R. J. & Morse, G. M. (1992). Restructuring the science classroom. T.H.E. Journal, 20 (9), 69-72.
46. Rogers, E. M. & Shoemaker, F. F. (1971). Communication of Innovations: A cross-cultural approach, New York: The Free Press.
47. Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations, New York, NY: The Free Press.
48. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations, New York, NY: The Free Press.
49. Sarason, S. B. (1990). The predictable failure of educational reform - Can we change course before it's too late? San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
50. Scheffler, F. L. & Logan, J. P. (1999). Computer technology in schools: What teachers should know and be able to do. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31 (3), 305-322.
51. See, J. (1994). Technology and outcome-based education: Connections in concept and practice. The Computing Teacher, 17 (3), 30-31.
52. Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization, New York: Doubleday/ Currency.
53. Siegel, J. (1994). Teach your teachers well. Electronic Learning, 13 (7), 34.
54. Siegel, J. (1995). The state of teacher training. Electronic Learning, 14 (8), 43-45, 48-53.
55. Staessens, K. (1991). The professional culture of innovating primary schools: Nine case studies. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April 3-7, 1991, Chicago.
56. Stinson, J. (1994). Reinventing high school. Electronic Learning, 13 (4), 20-25.
57. Toffler, A. (1981). The third wave, New York, NY: Bantam Books.
58. Waugh, R. G. & Punch, K. F. (1987). Teacher receptivity to systemwide change in the implementation stage. Review of Educational Research, 57 (3), 237-254.