SO2 cap-and-trade program in the United States: A "living legend" of market effectiveness

Choosing Environmental Policy: Comparing Instruments and Outcomes In the United States and Europe

Volumn 9781936331468, Issue , 2004, Pages 41-66

  Burtraw, Dallas ^a   Palmer, Karen ^a  

^a RFF   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAP-AND-TRADE PROGRAM;

COMMERCE;

EID: 84908913330     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781936331468     Document Type: Chapter

References (75)

1. 2 Allowance Market: Effects of PUC Regulations. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44(2)(September): 271-289.
2. Bailey, E.M. 1996. Allowance Trading Activity and State Regulatory Rulings: Evidence from the U.S. Acid Rain Program. MIT-CEEPR 96-002WP (March). Mimeo. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
3. Banzhaf, S., D. Burtraw, and K. Palmer. 2002. Efficient Emission Fees in the U.S. Electricity Sector. RFF Discussion Paper 02-45 (October). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future
4. Bloyd, C., et al. 1996. Tracking and Analysis Framework (TAF) Model Documentation and User's Guide, ANL/DIS/TM-36, Argonne National Laboratory, December.
5. Bohi, D. 1994. Utilities and State Regulators Are Failing to Take Advantage of Emission Allowance Trading. The Electricity Journal 7(2): 20-27.
6. 2 Allowance Trading: How Do Expectations and Experience Measure Up? The Electricity Journal 10(7)(August/September): 67-75.
7. 2 Emissions Trading Program: Cost Savings without Allowance Trades. Contemporary Economic Policy 14(April): 79-94.
8. Burtraw, D. 2000. Innovation under the Tradable Sulfur Dioxide Emission Permits Programme in the U.S. Electricity Sector. Innovation and the Environment, Proceedings from OECD Workshop, June 19.
9. 2 Trading and Banking. Environmental Science and Technology 33(20)(October 15): 3489-3494.
10. Burtraw, D., A.J. Krupnick, E. Mansur, D. Austin, and D. Farrell. 1998. The Costs and Benefits of Reducing Air Pollutants Related to Acid Rain. Contemporary Economic Policy 16(October): 379-400.
11. 2 Control by Electric Utilities: What Are the Gains from Trade? Journal of Political Economy 108(6): 1292-1326.
12. Cronshaw, M.B., and J.B. Kruse. 1996. Regulated Firms in Pollution Permit Markets with Banking. Journal of Regulatory Economics 9: 179-189.
13. Edison Electric Institute. 1983. Evaluation of H.R. 3400-The Sikorski/Waxman Bill for Acid Rain Abatement. Washington, DC.
14. Ellerman, A.D. 1998. Note on the Seemingly Indefinite Extension of Power Plant Lives, A Panel Contribution. Energy Journal 19(2): 129-132.
15. Ellerman, A.D. 2000. From Autarkic to Market-Based Compliance: Learning from Our Mistakes. In Emissions Trading, edited by R.F. Kosobud. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
16. 2 Cap-and-Trade Program. MIT/CEEPR Working Paper 03-003 (February). Also forthcoming in OECD, Ex-Post Evaluation of Tradable Permits: Case Study Reports.
17. Ellerman, A., and J.-P. Montero. 1998. The Declining Trend in Sulfur Dioxide Emissions: Implications for Allowance Prices. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36(1) (July): 26-45.
18. 2 Emissions Trading. MIT-CEEPR Working Paper. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
19. Ellerman, A.D., P.L. Joskow, R. Schmalensee, J.-P. Montero, and E. Bailey. 2000. Markets for Clean Air: The U.S. Acid Rain Program. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Elman, B., B. Braine, and R. Stuebi. 1990. Acid Rain Emission Allowances and Future Capacity Growth in the Electric Utility Industry. Journal of Air and Waste Management Association 40(7): 979-986.
21. Fieldston Company, Inc. 1996. Coal Supply and Transportation Markets during Phase One: Change, Risk and Opportunity. Prepared for Electric Power Research Institute, TR-105916 (January).
22. Fullerton, D., S.P. McDermott, and J.P. Caulkins. 1997. Sulfur Dioxide Compliance of a Regulated Utility. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 34(September): 32-53.
23. Goulder, L.H., I.W.H. Parry, and D. Burtraw. 1997. Revenue-Raising vs. Other Approaches to Environmental Protection: The Critical Significance of Pre-Existing Tax Distortions. RAND Journal of Economics 28(4)(Winter): 708-731.
24. Government Accounting Office (GAO). 1994. Air Pollution: Allowance Trading Offers an Opportunity to Reduce Emissions at Less Cost. GAO/RCED-95-30. Washington, DC.
25. 2 Allowance Market. In Emissions Trading, edited by R.F. Kosobud. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
26. Hausker, K. 1992. The Politics and Economics of Auction Design in the Market for Sulfur Dioxide Pollution. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 11(4)(Fall): 553-572.
27. Heller, J., and S. Kaplan, 1996. "Coal Supply and Transportation Markets During Phase One: Change, Risk and Opportunity." Report prepared for the Electric Power Research Institute, January.
28. ICF. 1989. Economic Analysis of Title V (sic) (Acid Rain Provision) of the Administration's Proposed Clean Air Act Amendments (HR 3030/S 1490). Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC (September).
29. ICF. 1990. Comparison of the Economic Impacts of the Acid Rain Provisions of the Senate Bill (S. 1630) and the House Bill (S. 1630). Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC (July).
30. ICF. 1995. Economic Analysis of Title IV Requirements of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments. Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC (September).
31. Kete, N. 1992. The Politics of Markets: The Acid Rain Control Policy in the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments. Ph.D. dissertation, Johns Hopkins University.
32. Keohane, N.O. 2000. Environmental Policy Instruments and Technical Change: The Sulfur Dioxide. Unpublished manuscript. Department of Economics, Harvard University.
33. Keohane, N.O. 2002. Environmental Policy and the Choice of Abatement Technique: Evidence from Coal Fired Power Plants. Paper presented at the Second World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economics, Monterrey, CA, June. Available at http://weber.ucsd.edu/~carsonvs/papers/867.pdf (accessed November 27, 2002 ).
34. Kruger, J.A., and M. Dean. 1997. Looking Back on SO2 Trading: What's Good for the Environment Is Good for the Market. Public Utilities Fortnightly 135 (August).
35. 2 Emission Allowance Trading Program. Discussion Paper 98-35 (May). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
36. McLean, B.J. 1997. Evolution of Marketable Permits: The U.S. Experience with Sulfur Dioxide Allowance Trading. International Journal of Environment and Pollution 8(1/2): 19-36.
37. Montero, J.-P. 1999. Voluntary Compliance with Market-Based Environmental Policy: Evidence from the U.S. Acid Rain Program. Journal of Political Economy 107(October): 998-1033.
38. Nelson, R.A., T. Tietenberg, and M.R. Donihue. 1993. Differential Environmental Regulation: Effects on Electric Utility Capital Turnover and Emissions. Review of Economics and Statistics 75(2): 368-373.
39. Pizer, W. 2002. Combining Price and Quantity Controls to Mitigate Global Climate Change. Journal of Public Economics 85(3), 409-434.
40. Popp, D. 2001. Pollution Control Innovations and the Clean Air Act of 1990. Working paper W8593 (November). National Bureau of Economic Research.
41. Portney, P.R. 1990. Economics and the Clean Air Act. Journal of Economic Perspectives 4(4): 173-181.
42. Regens, J.L., and R.W. Rycroft. 1988. The Acid Rain Controversy. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
43. Resources Data International. 1995. Phase I Databook. Boulder, CO.
44. 2 Trading Program. In Market Based Approaches to Environmental Policy: Regulatory Innovations to the Fore, edited by R.F. Kosobud and J.M. Zimmerman. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
45. Rose, K., A.S. Taylor, and M. Harunuzzaman. 1993. Regulatory Treatment of Electric Utility Compliance Strategies, Costs and Emission Allowances. National Regulatory Research Institute, Ohio State University, Columbus (December).
46. Rubin, J. 1996. A Model of Intertemporal Emission Trading, Banking and Borrowing. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 31(3): 269-286.
47. Seligman, D.A. 1994. Air Pollution Emissions Trading: Opportunity or Scam? Washington, DC: Sierra Club.
48. 2 (It's Higher Than You Think). Public Utility Fortnightly May 15: 22-29.
49. Solomon, B.D., and R. Lee. 2000. Emissions Trading Systems and Environmental Justice. Environment 42(8): 32-45.
50. 2 Allowances. Public Utility Research Center, University of Florida (December 20).
51. 2 Allowance Trading. Journal of Economic Perspectives 12(3)(Summer): 69-88.
52. 2 Hot Spots-Good News from the Acid Rain Program. Environmental Reporter 31:19(May 12): 954-959.
53. Swift, B. 2001. How Environmental Laws Work: An Analysis of the Utility Sector's Response to Regulation of Nitrogen Oxides and Sulfur Dioxide under the Clean Air Act. Tulane Environmental Law Journal 14(2)(Summer): 309-425.
54. Swinton, J.R. 2002. The Potential for Cost Savings in the Sulfur Dioxide Allowance Market: Empirical Evidence from Florida. Land Economics 78(3): 390-404.
55. Taylor, M. 200l. Legislative-Driven Innovation: The Influence of Government Action on Technological Change in Environmental Control. Ph.D. dissertation. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.
56. Temple, Barker and Sloane (TBS), Inc. 1983. Evaluation of H.R. 3400: The "Sikorski/Waxman" Bill for Acid Rain Abatement. Prepared for the Edison Electric Institute (September 20).
57. Temple, Barker and Sloane (TBS), Inc. 1986. Evaluation of H.R. 4567: The "Acid Deposition Control Act of 1986." Prepared for the Edison Electric Institute (April 14).
58. Torrens, I.M., J.E. Cichanowicz, and J.B. Platt. 1992. The 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments: Overview, Utility Industry Responses, and Strategic Implications. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 17: 211-233.
59. U.S. Energy Information Administration (U.S. EIA). 1991. Coal Data: A Reference. DOE/EIA-0064(90). Washington, DC.
60. U.S. Energy Information Administration (U.S. EIA). 1994. Electric Utility Phase I Acid Rain Compliance Strategies for the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. DOE/EIA-0582. Washington, DC.
61. U.S. Energy Information Administration (U.S. EIA). 1995a. Coal Data: A Reference. DOE/EIA-0064(93). Washington, DC.
62. U.S. Energy Information Administration (U.S. EIA). 1995b. Energy Policy Act Transportation Rate Study: Interim Report on Coal Transportation. DOE/EIA-0597 (October). Washington, DC.
63. U.S. Energy Information Administration (U.S. EIA). 1996. Annual Energy Outlook 1997. DOE/EIA-0383(97). Washington, DC.
64. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). 1995. Acid Deposition Standard Feasibility Study: Report to Congress. EPA 430-R-95-001a (October).
65. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). 2001. EPA's Acid Rain Program: Results of Phase I, Outlook for Phase II. EPA 430-F-01-022. Washington, DC: Clean Air Markets Division (October). Available at www.epa.gov/airmarkets (accessed November 21, 2002 ).
66. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). 2002. EPA Acid Rain Program: 2001 Progress Report EPA-430-R-02-009. Washington, D.C.: Clean Air Markets Division (November). Available at www.epa.gov/airmarkets/cmprpt/arp01/2001report.pdf (accessed February 3, 2003 ).
67. 2 Allowance Trading Activity 1995-1999: Plants Acquiring Allowance for Compliance, Beyond Each Year's Allocation; Plants Supplying These Allowances. Available at http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/cmap/trading.html (accessed November 25, 2002 ).
68. U.S. National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program (NAPAP). 1991. 1990 Integrated Assessment Report. Washington, DC.
69. U.S. Office of Technology Assessment (U.S. OTA). 1983. An Analysis of the "Sikorski/Waxman" Acid Rain Control Proposal: H.R. 3400, The National Acid Deposition Control Act of 1983. Staff memorandum (revised July 12).
70. Van Horn Consulting, Energy Ventures Analysis, Inc., and K.D. White. 1993. Integrated Analysis of Fuel, Technology and Emission Allowance Markets. Prepared for the Electric Power Research Institute, EPRI TR-102510 (August).
71. 2 Compliance and Allowance Trading: Developments and Outlook. Prepared for the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), EPRI TR-107897 (April).
72. 2 Compliance in a Competitive and Uncertain Future. Prepared for the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), TR-105490, Palo Alto, CA (final report: September).
73. Williams, R.C. III. 2002. Environmental Tax Interactions When Pollution Affects Health or Productivity. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44: 261-270.
74. 2 Allowance Market. The Electricity Journal 8(4): 50-54.
75. Zuckerman, B., and S.L. Weiner. 1998. Environmental Policymaking: A Workshop on Scientific Credibility, Risk and Regulation. Center for International Studies, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, September 24-25.