Sulfur dioxide compliance of a regulated utility

Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 32-53

  Fullerton, Don ^a   McDermott, Shaun P ^b   Caulkins, Jonathan P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY; EMISSIONS CONTROL; INDUSTRIAL REGULATION; SULPHUR EMISSIONS; TECHNOLOGY CHOICE;

USA;

EID: 0031239114     PISSN: 00950696     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jeem.1997.1004     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Averch Harvey, Johnson Leland L. Behavior of the firm under regulatory constraint. Amer. Econom. Rev. 52:1962;1052-1069.
2. 2. Energy Policy. 22:1994;748-754.
3. Bohi Douglas R., Burtraw Dallas. Avoiding regulatory gridlock in the acid rain program. J. Policy Anal. Management. 10:1991;676-684.
4. Bohi Douglas R., Burtraw Dallas. Utility investment behavior and the emission trading market. Res. Energy. 14:1992;129-153.
5. Brooke Anthony, Kendrick David, Meeraus Alexander. GAMS (General Algebraic Modeling System). 1992;GAMS Development Corp. Washington.
6. 2.
7. Chao Hung-Po, Wilson Robert. Option value of emission allowances. J. Regul. Econom. 5:1993;233-249.
8. Coggins Jay S., Smith Vincent H. Some welfare effects of emission allowance trading in a twice-regulated industry. J. Environ. Econom. Management. 25:1993;275-297.
9. 2. J. Environ. Econom. Management. 30:1996;58-72.
10. Cronshaw Mark B., Kruse Jamie Brown. Regulated firms in pollution permit markets with banking. J. Regul. Econom. 9:1996;79-89.
11. Electric Perspectives. 17:1993;112-112.
12. El-Wakil M. M. Powerplant Technology. 1984;McGraw-Hill, New York.
13. Electric Light Power. 72:1994;1-4.
14. Electric Power Research Institute, 1993, Integrated Analysis of Fuel, Technology and Emission Allowance Markets: Electric Utility Responses to the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990.
15. 2. 1992.
16. Hahn Robert W. Market power and transferable property rights. Quart. J. Econom. 99:1984;753-765.
17. Hahn Robert W., May Carol. The behavior of the allowance market: Theory and evidence. Electricity J. 7:1994;28-37.
18. 2. Electric Light Power. 72:1994;1-4.
19. Joskow Paul L., Schmalensee Richard. Incentive regulation for electric utilities. Yale J. Regul. 4:1986;1-49.
20. Keeler Andrew G. Noncompliant firms in transferable discharge permit markets: Some extensions. J. Environ. Econom. Management. 21:1991;180-189.
21. R. J. Keeth, P. T. Radcliffe, P. A. Ireland, 1992, Economic evaluations of 28 FGD processes, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)/Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI).
22. Douglas, J. Lober, Michael, Bailey, 1995, Implementing a Market-Based Environmental Policy: Utility Behavior in the Sulfur Dioxide Allowance Trading Program, Duke University School of the Environment.
23. Misiolek W. S., Elder H. W. Exclusionary manipulation of markets for pollution rights. J. Environ. Econom. Management. 16:1989;156-166.
24. Montgomery W. D. Markets in licences and efficient pollution control programs. J. Econom. Theory. 5:1972;395-418.
25. Palmer Karen, Krupnick Alan, Dowlatabadi Hadi, Siegel Stuart. Social costing of electricity in Maryland: Effects on pollution, investment, and prices. Energy J. 16:1995;1-26.
26. Rico Renee. The U.S. allowance trading system for sulfur dioxide: An update on market experience. Environ. Res. Econom. 5:1995;115-129.
27. Rose Kenneth, Burns Robert E., Coggins Jay S., Harunuzzaman Mohammad, Viezer Timothy W. Public Utility Commission Implementation of the Clean Air Act's Allowance Trading Program. 1992;Ohio State UniversityThe National Regulatory Research Institute, Columbus.
28. Rose Kenneth, Burns Robert E. Regulatory Policy Issues and the Clean Air Act: Issues and Papers from the State Implementation Workshops. 1993;Ohio State UniversityThe National Regulatory Research Institute, Columbus.
29. Rose Kenneth, Taylor Alan S., Harunuzzaman Mohammad. Regulatory Treatment of Electric Utility Compliance Strategies, Costs, and Emission Allowances. 1993;Ohio State UniversityThe National Regulatory Research Institute, Columbus.
30. Stavins Robert N. Transaction costs and tradeable permits. J. Environ. Econom. Management. 29:1995;133-148.
31. Stein Henry. Utilities make their CAAA phase I compliance plans - but base them on economics. Electric Light Power. 71:1993;12-14.
32. Thomas, H. Tietenberg, 1985, Emissions Trading: An Exercise in Reforming Pollution Policy.
33. U.S. Department of Energy, 1995, Household Energy Consumption and Expenditures, 1993, Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC.
34. Winebrake James J., Farrell Alexander E., Bernstein Mark A. The clean air act's sulfur dioxide emissions market: Estimating the costs of regulatory and legislative intervention. Res. Energy Econom. 17:1995;239-260.