The potential for cost savings in the sulfur dioxide allowance market: Empirical evidence from Florida

Land Economics

Volumn 78, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 390-404

  Swinton, John R ^a  

^a J Whitney Bunting Sch of Business   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABATEMENT COST; EMISSION CONTROL; EMISSIONS TRADING; SULFUR EMISSION;

FLORIDA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0036383693     PISSN: 00237639     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3146897     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. 2 allowance market: Effects of PUC regulations
2. The empirical properties of two classes of designs for transferable discharge permit markets
3. Market failure in incentive-based regulation: The case of emissions trading
4. Utility investment behavior and the emission trading market
5. 2 trading program: Cost savings without allowance trades
6. Sulfur dioxide control by electric utilities: What are the gains from trade?
7. 2 allowances
8. Efficiency in pollution control in the short and long runs: A system of rental emissions permits
9. Duality approaches to microeconomic theory
10. The declining trend in sulfur dioxide emissions: Implications of allowance prices
11. Multilaterial productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: A nonparametric approach
12. Derivation of shadow prices for undesirable outputs: A distance function approach
13. The measurement of productive efficiency
14. Sulfur dioxide compliance of a regulated industry
15. Economic prescriptions of economic problems: How the patient followed the doctor's orders
16. Marketable permits: Lessons for theory and practice
17. Where did all the markets go? An analysis of EPA's emissions trading program
18. The behavior of the allowance market: Theory and evidence
19. On market air-pollution permits: The case for a system of pollution offsets
20. Markets in licenses and efficient pollution control programs
21. An interim evaluation of sulfur dioxide emissions trading
22. Experience with market-based environmental policy instruments
23. 2 reduction