The Science of Organizational Change and the Art of Changing Organizations

Journal of Applied Behavioral Science

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 463-477

  Woodman, Richard W ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

applied behavioral science; change management; organization development; organizational change

Indexed keywords

EID: 84908657101     PISSN: 00218863     EISSN: 15526879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0021886314550575     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Amabile T. M.Research in organizational behavior. Staw B. M.Cummings L. L., ed. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press; 1988:123-167.
2. Armenakis A. A.Research in organizational change and development. Pasmore W. A.Woodman R. W., ed. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press; 1988:163-194.
3. Barends E.,Janssen B.,ten Have W.,ten Have S.Difficult but doable: Increasing the internal validity of organizational change management studies.Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 2014a;50:50-54
4. Barends E.,Janssen B.,ten Have W.,ten Have S.Effects of change interventions: What kind of evidence do we really have?.Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 2014b;50:5-27
5. Bartunek J. M.,Woodman R. W.Handbook of positive organizational scholarship. Cameron K.Spreitzer G., ed. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 2012:727-736.
6. Bartunek J. M.,Woodman R. W.Annual review of organizational psychology and organizational behavior. Morgerson F. P.Aguinis H.Ashford S. J., ed. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews; in press:
7. Bass B. M.Issues involved in relations between methodological rigor and reported outcomes in evaluation of organization development.Journal of Applied Psychology. 1983;68:197-199
8. Beer M.Comments on “Effects of change interventions: What kind of evidence do we really have?”.Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 2014;50:28-33
9. Bullock S. J.,Svyantek D. J.Positive-findings bias in positive-findings bias research.Academy of Management Proceedings. 1983;16:221-224
10. Bushe G. R.,Marshak R. J.Revisioning organization development: Diagnostic and dialogic premises and patterns of practice.Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 2009;45:348-368
11. Bushe G. R.,Marshak R. J.Research in organizational change and development. Shani A. B.Noumair D. A., ed. Bingley, England: Emerald; 2014:55-97.
12. Chin R.,Benne K. D.The planning of change. 1976. General strategies for effecting changes in human systems. In BennisW. G.BenneK. D.ChinR.CoreyK. E. (Eds.), The planning of change (3rd ed., pp. 22-45). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Bennis W. G.Benne K. D.Chin R.Corey K. E., ed. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston; 1976:22-45.
13. Csikszentmihalyi M.Theories of creativity. Runco M. A.Albert R. S., ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1990:190-212.
14. Cummings T. G.,Worley C. G.Organization development and change. 2015. Organization development and change (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.Boston, MA: Cengage Learning; 2015:
15. Friedlander F.,Brown L. D.Organization development.Annual Review of Psychology. 1974;25:313-341
16. Frith C. D.,Frith U.Mechanisms of social cognition.Annual Review of Psychology. 2012;63:287-313
17. Golembiewski R. T.,Billingsley K.,Yeager S.Measuring change and persistence in human affairs: Types of change generated by OD designs.Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 1976;12:133-157
18. Grant A. M.,Wall T. D.The neglected science and art of quasi-experimentation: Why-to, when-to, and how-to advice for organizational researchers.Organizational Research Methods. 2009;12:653-686
19. Hawking S.Black holes and baby universes. New York, NY: Bantam; 1994:41-47.
20. Hawking S.,Mlodinow L.The grand design. New York, NY: Bantam; 2010:39-59.
21. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. Heracleous L., ed. 2011:5-134.
22. Holyoak K. J.,Cheng P. W.Causal learning and inference as a rational process: The new synthesis.Annual Review of Psychology. 2011;62:135-163
23. Israel B. A.,Schurman S. J.,Hugentobler M. K.Conducting action research: Relationships between organization members and researchers.Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 1992;28:74-101
24. Kilbourne L. M.,Woodman R. W.Social creativity in organizations. Purser R.Montuori A., ed. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press; 1999:125-150.
25. Lewin K.Action research and minority problems.Journal of Social Issues. 1946;2 (4): 34-46
26. Milgram R. M.Theories of creativity. Runco M. A.Albert R. S., ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1990:215-233.
27. The psychology of organizational change: Viewing change from the employee’s perspective. Oreg S.Michel A.By R., ed. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 2013:
28. Piderit S. K.Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: A multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change.Academy of Management Review. 2000;25:783-794
29. Porras J. I.,Robertson P. J.Research in organizational change and development. Woodman R. W.Pasmore W. A., ed. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press; 1987:1-57.
30. Rynes S. L.,Bartunek J. M.,Daft R. L.Across the great divide: Knowledge creation, and transfer between practitioners and academics.Academy of Management Journal. 2001;44:340-355
31. Schwarz G. M.,Stensaker I. G.Progress in evidence: You can’t always get what you want.Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 2014;50:34-39
32. Seo M.,Putnam L. L.,Bartunek J. M.Handbook of organizational change and innovation. Poole M. S.Van de Ven A. H., ed. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 2004:73-107.
33. Stebbins M. W.,Snow C. C.Processes and payoffs of programmatic action research.Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 1982;18:69-86
34. Terborg J. A.,Howard G. S.,Maxwell S. E.Evaluating planned organizational change: A method for assessing alpha, beta, and gamma change.Academy of Management Review. 1980;5:109-121
35. Terpstra D. E.Relationships between methodological rigor and reported outcomes in organization development evaluation research.Journal of Applied Psychology. 1981;68:541-543
36. Woodman R. W.Research in organizational change and development. Woodman R. W.Pasmore W. A., ed. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press; 1989:161-180.
37. Woodman R. W.Handbook of organizational creativity. Zhou J.Shalley C., ed. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2008:283-300.
38. Woodman R. W.The role of internal validity in evaluation research on organizational change interventions.Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 2014;50:40-49
39. Woodman R. W.,Bartunek J. M.The psychology of organizational change: Viewing change from the employee’s perspective. Oreg S.Michel A.By R., ed. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 2013:301-323.
40. Woodman R. W.,Sawyer J. E.,Griffin R. W.Toward a theory of organizational creativity.Academy of Management Review. 1993;18:293-321
41. Woodman R. W.,Wayne S. J.An investigation of positive-findings bias in evaluation of organization development interventions.Academy of Management Journal. 1985;28:889-913
42. Zmud R. W.,Armenakis A. A.Understanding the measurement of change.Academy of Management Review. 1978;3:661-669