The Role of Internal Validity in Evaluation Research on Organizational Change Interventions

Journal of Applied Behavioral Science

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 40-49

  Woodman, Richard W ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893901925     PISSN: 00218863     EISSN: 15526879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0021886313515613     Document Type: Note

References (20)

1. Beard J. W.,Woodman R. W.,Moesel D.Research in organizational change and development. Woodman R. W.Pasmore W. A., ed. Stamford, CN: JAI Press; 1998:159-181.
2. Bullock R. J.,Svyantek D. J.Positive-findings bias in positive-findings bias research.Academy of Management Proceedings. 1983;:221-224.
3. Bullock R. J.,Svyantek D. J.Analyzing meta-analysis: Potential problems, an unsuccessful replication, and evaluation criteria.Journal of Applied Psychology. 1985;70:108-115.
4. Campbell D. T.,Stanley J. C.Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally; 1963:.
5. Cook T. D.,Campbell D. T.,Peracchio L.Handbook of industrial & organizational psychology. 1990). Quasi experimentation. In DunnetteM. D.HoughL. M. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial & organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 491-576). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Dunnette M. D.Hough L. M., ed. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1990:491-576.
6. Friedlander F.,Brown L. D.Organization development.Annual Review of Psychology. 1974;25:313-341.
7. Grant A. M.,Wall T. D.The neglected science and art of quasi-experimentation: Why-to, when-to, and how-to advice for organizational researchers.Organizational Research Methods. 2009;12:653-686.
8. Kerlinger F. N.,Lee H. B.Foundations of behavioral research. 2000). Foundations of behavioral research (4th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart & Winston; 2000:.
9. Macy B. A.,Izumi H.Research in organizational change and development. Woodman R. W.Pasmore W. A., ed. Greenwich, CN: JAI Press; 1993:235-313.
10. Pasmore W. A.,Stymne B.,Shani A. B.,Mohrman S. A.,Adler N.Handbook of collaborative management research. Shani A. B.Mohrman S. A.Pasmore W. A.Stymne B.Adler N., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2008:7-31.
11. Pasmore W. A.,Woodman R. W.,Simmons A. L.Handbook of collaborative management research. Shani A. B.Mohrman S. A.Pasmore W. A.Stymne B.Adler N., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2008:567-582.
12. Robertson P. J.,Roberts D. R.,Porras J. I.Research in organizational change and development. Woodman R. W.Pasmore W. A., ed. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press; 1993:1-39.
13. Rynes S. L.,Bartunek J. M.,Daft R. L.Across the great divide: Knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics.Academy of Management Journal. 2001;44:340-355.
14. Schwarz G. M.Research in organizational change and development. Woodman R. W.Pasmore W. A.Shani A. B., ed. Bingley, England: Emerald Group; 2009:301-348.
15. Schwarz G. M.Shaking fruit out of the tree: Temporal effects and life cycle in organizational change research.Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 2012;48:342-379.
16. Handbook of collaborative management research. Shani A. B.Mohrman S. A.Pasmore W. A.Stymne B.Adler N., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2008:.
17. Terpstra D. E.Relationship between methodological rigor and reported outcomes in organizational development evaluation research.Journal of Applied Psychology. 1981;66:541-543.
18. Woodman R. W.Research in organizational change and development. Woodman R. W.Pasmore W. A., ed. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press; 1989:161-180.
19. Woodman R. W.,Bingham J. B.,Yuan F.Handbook of organization development. Cummings T. G., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2008:187-215.
20. Woodman R. W.,Wayne S. J.An investigation of positive-findings bias in evaluation of organization development interventions.Academy of Management Journal. 1985;28:889-913.