CAMY: Applying a pet dog analogy to everyday ubicomp products

UbiComp 2014 - Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 63-74

  Row, Yea Kyung ^a   Nam, Tek Jin ^a  

^a Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Designed animism; Emotional user experience; Pet dog analogy; Ubicomp product design

Indexed keywords

UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING;

DESIGNED ANIMISM; EMOTIONAL EXPERIENCES; EMOTIONAL FUNCTIONS; KEY CHARACTERISTICS; LITERATURE REVIEWS; UBICOMP; UBICOMP SYSTEMS; USER EXPERIENCE;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 84908565926     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2632048.2636075     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (63)

1. André, E., Klesen, M., Gebhard, P., Allen, S., & Rist, T. (2000). Integrating models of personality and emotions into lifelike characters. In Affective interactions, Springer (2000), 150-165.
2. Axelrod, L., Hone, K. E-motional Advantage: Performance and Satisfaction Gains with Affective Computing. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2005, ACM Press (2005), 1192-1195.
3. Bartneck, C., & Forlizzi, J. Shaping human-robot interaction: understanding the social aspects of intelligent robotic products. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2009, ACM press (2004), 1731-1731.
4. Belk, R. W. Metaphoric relationships with pets. Society and Animals 4, 2 (1996), 121-145.
5. Bell, G. Intimate Ubiquitous Computing. In Proc. Ubicomp 2003, ACM Press (2003), 3-6.
6. Bickmore, T. W., & Picard, R. W. Towards caring machines. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2004, ACM Press (2004), 1489-1492.
7. Borgmann, A. Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life, University of Chicago Press, 1984.
8. Brave, S., Nass, C., & Hutchinson, K. Computers that care: investigating the effects of orientation of emotion exhibited by an embodied computer agent. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 62, 2 (2005), 161- 178.
9. Buchenau, M., & Suri, J. F. Experience prototyping. In Proc. the 3rd conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques. ACM Press (2000), 424-433.
10. Chapman, J. Design for (emotional) durability. Design Issues 25, 4 (2009), 29-35.
11. Chen, C. Y., Kobayashi, M., & Oh, L. M. ShareComp: sharing for companionship. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2005, ACM press (2005), 2074-2078.
12. Dahlbäck, N., Jönsson, A., & Ahrenberg, L. Wizard of Oz studies-why and how. Knowledge-based systems 6, 4 (1993), 258-266.
13. Dotson, M. J., & Hyatt, E. M. Understanding dog- human companionship. Journal of Business Research, 61, 5 (2008), 457-466.
14. Elliot, K., Neustaedter, C., & Greenberg, S. Time, ownership, and awareness: The value of contextual locations in the home. In Proc. Ubicomp 2005, ACM Press (2005), 251-268.
15. Endenburg, N., Hart, H. T., & Bouw, J. Motives for acquiring companion animals. Journal of Economic Psychology 15, 1 (1994), 191-206.
16. Fogle, B. Interrelations between people and pets. The Canadian veterinary journal 25, 4(1981). 190.
17. Gaver, W. W., Bowers, J., Boucher, A., Gellerson, H., Pennington, S., Schmidt, A., ... & Walker, B. The drift table: designing for ludic engagement. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2004, ACM Press (2004), 885-900.
18. Gaver, W. What should we expect from research through design? In Proc. CHI 2012. ACM Press (2012), 937-946.
19. Helmes, J., Hummels, C., & Sellen, A. The other brother: re-experiencing spontaneous moments from domestic life. In Proc. the 3rd International Conference on TEI, ACM Press (2009), 233-240.
20. Helmes, J., Taylor, A. S., Cao, X., Höök, K., Schmitt, P., & Villar, N. Rudiments 1, 2 & 3: design speculations on autonomy. In Proc. the 5th international conference on TEI, ACM Press (2011), 145-152.
21. Herbsleb, J.D.: Metaphorical representation in collaborative software engineering. In Proc. the international joint conference on Work activities coordination and collaboration, ACM Press (1999), 117-126.
22. Hirschman, E. C. Consumers and their animal companions. Journal of Consumer Research 20, 4 (1994). 616-632.
23. Holbrook, M. B. Reflections on rocky. Society and Animals 4, 2 (1996), 147-168.
24. Huang, C. C., Bardzell, J., & Terrell, J. Can your pet rabbit read your email?: A critical analysis of the Nabaztag rabbit. In Proc. DPPI, ACM press (2011), 3.
25. Jacobsson, M., Ljungblad, S., Bodin, J., Knurek, J., &Holmquist, L. E. GlowBots: robots that evolve relationships. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2007 emerging technologies. ACM Press (2007), 7.
26. Jacobsson, M. Play, Belief and Stories about Robots: A Case Study of a Pleo Blogging Community. In Proc. of RO-MAN: IEEE (2009), 232-237.
27. Karlesky, M., &Isbister, K. Fidget widgets: designing for the physical margins of digital workspaces. In Proc. the 8th International Conference on TEI, ACM Press (2014), 301-304.
28. Kim, C. W. & Nam, T.-J. Talkative cushion: A phatic audio device to support family communication. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2009, ACM press (2009), 2631-2634.
29. Kim, Y. K., Row, Y. K., & Nam, T. J. Knoby: pet-like interactive door knob. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2012, ACM press (2012), 1685-1690.
30. Landin, H., Lundgren, S. & Prison, J. The iron horse: A sound ride. In Proc. Nordic CHI, ACM press (2002), 303-306.
31. Lee, C. H. J., Kim, K., Breazeal, C., & Picard, R. Shybot: friend-stranger interaction for children living with autism. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2012, ACM press (2008), 3375-3380.
32. Lee, J. H., Park, J. Y., & Nam, T. J. 2007. Emotional interaction through physical movement. In Proc. HCI Intelligent Multimodal Interaction Environments, Springer (2007), 401-410.
33. Ljungblad, S., & Holmquist, L. E. Transfer scenarios: grounding innovation with marginal practices. In Proc. CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 737-746.
34. Mahlke, S., Minge, M., & Thüring, M. Measuring multiple components of emotions in interactive contexts. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2006, ACM Press (2006), 1061- 1066.
35. Marti, P., Pollini, A., Rullo, A. & Shibata, T. Engaging with artificial pets. In Proc. annual conference on European association of cognitive ergonomics, University of Athens (2005), 99-106.
36. Marti, S., Schmandt, C.(2005). Physical Embodiments for Mobile Communications Agents. In Proc. UIST 2005, ACM Press (2004), 231-240.
37. Melson, G. F., Kahn Jr, P. H., Beck, A. M., Friedman, B., Roberts, T., & Garrett, E. Robots as dogs?: children's interactions with the robotic dog AIBO and a live australian shepherd. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2005, ACM press (2005), 1649-1652.
38. Memoirs. Retrieved from: http://everyware.kr/home/portfolio/memoirs/.
39. MIDAS. http://cidr.kaist.ac.kr/mediawiki/index.php/MIDAS.
40. Mori, M., MacDorman, K. F., & Kageki, N. The uncanny valley [from the field]. Robotics & Automation Magazine 19, 2 (2012), 98-100.
41. Nass, C., Moon, Y. Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers. Journal of social issue physicals 25, 1 (2000), 81-103.
42. Screw by Andrew Neumann. Retrieved from: http://www.adneumann.com/ad.html.
43. Nittono, H., Fukushima, M., Yano, A., & Moriya, H. (2012). The power of kawaii: Viewing cute images promotes a careful behavior and narrows attentional focus. PloS one 7(9), (2012). e46362.
44. Norman, D. A. Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books, 2004.
45. Norman, D.A. Robots in the Home: What Might They Do? Interactions 12, 2 (2005), 65.
46. Oblinger, D. G., &Oblinger, J. (2005). Educating the Net Generation. EDUCAUSE Online book. Retrieved from: http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/pub7101.pdf.
47. Phuc, K. T., Racky, T., Roth, F., Wegmann, I., Pilz, M., Busch, C., & Söller-Eckert, C. COCO: The therapy robot. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2011, ACM press (2011) 1089-1094.
48. Picard, R. W. Affective computing, MIT press, 2000.
49. Potent objects. Retrieved from: http://vimeo.com/13111016.
50. Shibata, T., Wada, K., Saito, T., & Tanie, K. Human interactive robot for psychological enrichment and therapy. In Proc. AISB, 5 (2005), 98-109.
51. Stern, A. 12 Creating Emotional Relationships with Virtual Characters. Emotions in humans and artifacts, (2003). 233.
52. Sternberg, R. J. A triangular theory of love. Psychological review 93, 2 (1986), 119.
53. Strong, D. & Higgs, E. Borgmann's Philosophy of Technology, In Higgs, E. S., Light, A. and Strong, D. (Eds.) Technology and the Good Life? Chicago, 2000.
54. Suganuma, T., et al. Bridging the E-gaps: Towards Post- Ubiquitous Computing. In 20th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA), 2 (2006), 5.
55. Sung, J.-Y., Guo, L., Grinter, R. E. & Christensen, H. I. "My Roomba Is Rambo": Intimate Home Appliances. In Proc. Ubicomp 2007, Springer (2007), 145-162.
56. Swartz, L. Why people hate the paperclip: labels, appearance, behavior, and social responses to user interface agents, Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 2003.
57. Text rain Of Camille Utterback. Retrieved from: http://vimeo.com/13141591.
58. Topál, J., Miklósi, Á., Gácsi, M., Dóka, A., Pongrácz, P., ...& Csányi, V. The dog as a model for understanding human social behavior. Advances in the Study of Animal Behavior 39, (2009). 71-116.
59. van Allen, P., McVeigh-Schultz, J., Brown, B., Kim, H. M., & Lara, D., Ani Things: Animism and heterogeneous multiplicity. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2013, ACM press (2013), 2247-2256.
60. Veevers, J. E. The social meaning of pets: Alternative roles for companion animals. Marriage & Family Review 8, 3-4 (1985), 11-30.
61. Venkatesh, V. Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. Information System Research 11, 4 (2000), 342-365.
62. Zhang, P., & Li, N.: The Importance of Affective Quality. Communications of the ACM 48, 9 (2005), 105-108.
63. Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., & Evenson, S. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proc. CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 493-502.