Use of principal component approach to predict direct genomic breeding values for beef traits in Italian Simmental cattle

Journal of Animal Science

Volumn 91, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 29-37

  Gaspa, G ^a   Pintus, M A ^a   Nicolazzi, E L ^b,c   Vicario, D ^d   Valentini, A ^e   Dimauro, C ^a   Macciotta, N P P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASSARI   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITÀ CATTOLICA DEL SACRO CUORE   (Italy)

^c CRSA Consorzio di Ricerca e Sperimentazione degli Allevatori ^*  (Italy)

^d Associazione Nazionale Allevatori Razza Pezzata Rossa Italiana (ANAPRI)   (Italy)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TUSCIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Beef trait; Genomic selection; Principal component analysis

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BREEDING; CATTLE; DAIRYING; FEMALE; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ANIMALS; BREEDING; CATTLE; DAIRYING; FEMALE; GENETIC MARKERS; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; MALE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84873961373     PISSN: 00218812     EISSN: 15253163     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2527/jas.2011-5061     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ajmone-Marsan, P., N.P.P. Macciotta, M.A. Pintus, G. Gaspa, C. Pieramati, E. Nicolazzi, A. Albera, A. Nardone, and A. Valentini. 2010. Accuracies of Direct Genomic Breeding Values for calving ease estimated on Italian Piedmontese bulls with a principal component approach. In: Proc. Int. Conf. in Animal Genetics, ISAG, Edinburgh, UK. p. 62.
2. ANAPRI (Associazione Nazionale Allevatori Bovini di Razza Pezzata Rossa italiana, Udine, Italy). 2010. L'ndice di selezione. http://www.anapri.eu/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=68&Itemid=97. (Accessed 6 October 2012.)
3. Associazione Italiana Allevatori. 2011. Bollettino dei controlli della produttività del latte 2011. http://bollettino.aia.it/bollettino/Doc/TI_Note_Bo.pdf p. 3 (Accessed 6 October 2012.)
4. Bolormaa, S., J. E. Pryce, B. J. Hayes, and M. E. Goddard. 2010. Multivariate analysis of a genome-wide association study in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci 93:3818-3833.
5. Calus, M. P. L., and R. F. Veerkamp. 2007. Accuracy of breeding values when using and ignoring the polygenic effect in genomic breeding value estimation with a marker density of one SNP per cM. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 124:362-368.
6. Cole, J. B., P. M. VanRaden, J. R. O'Connell, C. P. Van Tassell, T. S. Sonstegard, R. D. Schnabel, J. F. Taylor, and G. R. Wiggans. 2009. Distribution and location of genetic effects for dairy traits. J. Dairy Sci. 92:2931-2946.
7. Daetwyler, H. D., B. Villanueva, and J. A. Woolliams. 2008. Accuracy of predicting the genetic risk of disease using a genome-wide approach. Plos One 3:E3395.
8. Dimauro, C., M. Cellesi, M. A. Pintus, and N. P. Macciotta. 2011. The impact of the rank of marker variance-covariance matrix in principal component evaluation for genomic selection applications. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 128:440-445.
9. Garrick, D. J. 2011. The nature, scope and impact of genomic prediction in beef cattle in the United States. Genet. Sel. Evol. 43:17.
10. Habier, D., R. L. Fernando, K. Kizilkaya, and D. J. Garrik. 2011. Extension of the bayesian alphabet for genomic selection. BMC Bioinformatics 12:186.
11. Habier, D., J. Tetens, F. R. Seefried, P. Lichtner, and G. Thaller. 2010. The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle. Genet. Sel. Evol. 42:5.
12. Hayes, B. J., A. J. Chamberlain, S. Maceachern, K. Savin, H. McPartlan, I. MacLeod, L. Sethuraman and M. E. Goddard. 2009a. A genome map of divergent artificial selection between Bos taurus dairy cattle and Bos taurus beef cattle. Anim. Genet. 40:176-184.
13. Hayes, B. J., P. M. Visscher, and M. E. Goddard. 2009b. Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix. Genet. Res. 91:47-60.
14. Kolbehdari, D., L. R. Schaeffer, and J. A. B. Robinson. 2007. Estimation of genome-wide haplotype effects in half-sib designs. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 124: 356-361.
15. Legarra, A., and I. Misztal. 2008. Technical note: Computing strategies in genome-wide selection. J. Dairy Sci. 91:360-366.
16. Liu, Z. T., F. R. Seefried, F. Reinhardt, S. Rensing, G. Thaller, and R. Reents. 2011. Impacts of both reference population size and inclusion of a residual polygenic effect on the accuracy of genomic prediction. Genet. Sel. Evol. 43:19.
17. Long, N., D. Gianola, G. J. M. Rosa, and K. A. Weigel. 2011. Dimension reduction and variable selection for genomic selection: Application to predicting milk yield in Holsteins. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 128:247-257.
18. Macciotta, N. P. P., G. Gaspa, R. Steri, E. L. Nicolazzi, C. Dimauro, C. Pieramati, and A. Cappio-Borlino. 2010a. Using eigenvalues as variance priors in the prediction of genomic breeding values by principal component analysis. J. Dairy Sci. 93:2765-2774.
19. Macciotta, N. P. P., M. A. Pintus, R. Steri, C. Pieramati, E. L. Nicolazzi, E. Santus, D. Vicario, J. T. van Kaam, A. Nardone, A. Valentini, and P. Ajmone-Marsan. 2010b. Accuracies of direct genomic breeding values estimated in dairy cattle with a principal component approach. J. Dairy Sci. 93(Suppl. 1):532-533 (Abstract).
20. Meuwissen, T. H. E., B. J. Hayes, and M. E. Goddard. 2001. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157:1819-1829.
21. Moser, G., B. Tier, R. E. Crump, M. S. Khatkar, and H. W. Raadsma. 2009. A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genome-wide SNP markers. Genet. Sel. Evol. 41:56.
22. Olson, K. M., P. M. VanRaden, M. E. Tooker, and T. A. Cooper. 2011. Differences among methods to validate genomic evaluations for dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 94:2613-2620.
23. Pintus, M. A., G. Gaspa, E. L. Nicolazzi, D. Vicario, A. Rossoni, P. Ajmone-Marsan, A. Nardone, C. Dimauro, and N. P. Macciotta. 2012. Prediction of genomic breeding values for dairy traits in Italian Brown and Simmental bulls using a principal component approach. J. Dairy Sci. 95:3390-3400.
24. Raadsma, H. W., M. S. Khatkar, G. Moser, M. Hobbs, R. Crump, J. A. L. Cavanagh, and B. Tier. 2009. Genome wide association studies in dairy cattle using high density snp scans. Proc. Assoc. Advancement Anim. Breed. Genet. 18:151-154.
25. Rolf, M. M., J. F. Taylor, R. D. Schnabel, S. D. McKay, M. C. McClure, S. L. Northcutt, M. S. Kerley, and R. L. Weaber. 2010. Impact of reduced marker set estimation of genomic relationship matrices on genomic selection for feed efficiency in Angus cattle. BMC genetics 11: 24.
26. Saatchi, M., M. McClure, S. McKay, M. Rolf, J. Kim, J. Decker, T. Taxis, R. Chapple, H. Ramey, S. Northcutt, S. Bauck, B. Woodward, J. Dekkers, R. Fernando, R. Schnabel, D. Garrick & J. Taylor. 2011. Accuracies of genomic breeding values in American Angus beef cattle using K-means clustering for cross-validation. Genet. Sel. Evol. 43:40.
27. Solberg, T. R., A. K. Sonesson, J. A. Woolliams, and T. H. E. Meuwissen. 2009. Reducing dimensionality for prediction of genome-wide breeding values. Genet. Sel. Evol. 41:29.
28. Tedeschi, L. O. 2006. Assessment of the adequacy of mathematical models. Agric. Syst. 89:225-247.
29. VanRaden, P. M., C. P. Van Tassell, G. R. Wiggans, T. S. Sonstegard, R. D. Schnabel, J. F. Taylor, and F. S. Schenkel. 2009. Invited review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. J. Dairy Sci. 92:16-24.
30. Wiggans, G. R., T. S. Sonstegard, P. M. Vanraden, L. K. Matukumalli, R. D. Schnabel, J. F. Taylor, F. S. Schenkel, and C. P. Van Tassell. 2009. Selection of single-nucleotide polymorphisms and quality of genotypes used in genomic evaluation of dairy cattle in the United States and Canada. J. Dairy Sci. 92:3431-3436.