Recommendations to improve wildlife exposure estimation for development of soil screening and cleanup values

Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 372-387

  Sample, Bradley E ^a   Schlekat, Chris ^b   Spurgeon, David J ^c   Menzie, Charlie ^d   Rauscher, Jon ^e   Adams, Bill ^f  

^a Ecological Risk   (United States)

^b Nickel Producers Environmental Research Association (NiPERA)   (United States)

^c CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY   (United Kingdom)

^d Region 6 ^*  (United States)

^e U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

^f RIO TINTO   (United States)

Author keywords

Eco SSLs; Ecological risk assessment; Ecological soil cleanup values; REACH; Wildlife exposure estimation

Indexed keywords

SOIL POLLUTANT;

ANIMAL; ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOIL POLLUTANT; STANDARDS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND REMEDIATION; MODELS, THEORETICAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOIL POLLUTANTS;

EID: 84908403607     PISSN: 15513793     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ieam.1482     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Abt KF, Bock WF. 1998. Seasonal variations of diet composition in farmland field mice Apodemus spp. and bank voles Clethrionomys glareolus. Acta Theriol (Warsz) 43:379-389.
2. Arthur WJ III, Alldredge AW. 1979. Soil ingestion by mule deer in north central Colorado. J Range Manage 32:67-70.
3. Arthur WJ III, Gates RJ. 1988. Trace elements intake via soil ingestion in pronghorns and in black-tailed jackrabbits. J Range Manage 41:162-166.
4. [ASTM] American Society for Testing and Materials. 2002. Standard guide for risk-based corrective action for protection of ecological resources. In: Annual book of ASTM standards, Volume 11.04. Philadelphia (PA): ASTM. E 2205-2.
5. Barnthouse LW, Munns WR, Sorensen MT. 2007. Population-level ecological risk assessment. Boca Raton (FL): CRC. 376 p.
6. Beyer WN, Conner E, Gerould S. 1994. Estimates of soil ingestion by wildlife. J Wildl Manage 58:375-382.
7. Beyer WN, Blus LJ, Henry CJ, Audet DJ. 1997. The role of sediment ingestion in exposing wood ducks to lead. Ecotoxicology 6:181-186.
8. Beyer WN, Audet DJ, Morton A, Campbell JK, LeCaptain L. 1998. Lead exposure of waterfowl ingesting Coeur d'Alene river basin sediments. J Environ Qual 27:1533-1538.
9. Beyer WN, Day D, Morton A, Pachepsky Y. 1998. Relation of lead exposure to sediment ingestion in mute swans on the Chesapeake Bay, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem 17:2298-2301.
10. Beyer WN, Spann J, Day D. 1999. Metal and sediment ingestion by dabbling ducks. Sci Total Environ 231:235-239.
11. Beyer WN, Audet DJ, Heinz GH, Hoffman DJ, Day D. 2000. Relation of waterfowl poisoning to sediment lead concentrations in the Coeur d'Alene River Basin. Ecotoxicology 9:207-218.
12. Beyer WN, Perry MC, Osenton PC. 2008. Sediment ingestion rates in waterfowl (Anatidae) and their use in environmental risk assessment. Integr Environ Assess Manag 4:246-251.
13. Calabrese EJ, Stanek E III. 1995. A dog's tale: Soil ingestion by a canine. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 32:93-95.
14. Calder WA, Braun EJ. 1983. Scaling of osmotic regulation in mammals and birds. Am J Physiol 224:R601-R606.
15. Carlsen TM, Coty JD, Kerchner JR. 2004. The spatial extent of contaminants and the landscape Scale: an analysis of the wildlife, conservation biology, and population modeling literature. Environ Toxicol Chem 23:798-811.
16. [CCME] Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment. 2006. A protocol for the derivation of environmental and human health soil quality guidelines. Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
17. Churchfield S, Rychlik L. 2006. Diets and coexistence in Neomys and Sorex shrews in Bialowieza forest, eastern Poland. J Zool 269:381-390.
18. Cleary GP, Corner LAL, O'Keeffe J, Marples NM. 2011. Diet of the European badger (Meles meles) in the Republic of Ireland: A comparison of results from an analysis of stomach contents and rectal faeces. Mammal Biol 76:470-475.
19. Colombo C, Monhemius AJ, Plant JA. 2008. The estimation of the bioavailabilities of platinum, Pd and rhodium in vehicle exhaust catalysts and road dusts using a physiologically based extraction test. Sci Total Environ 389:46-51.
20. Cortright KA, Wetzlich SE, Craigmill AL. 2009. A PBPK model for midazolam in four avian species. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 32:552-565.
21. Cullen AC, Frey HC. 1999. Probabilistic techniques in exposure assessment. New York (NY): Plenum. 335 p.
22. Day DD, Beyer WN, Hoffman DJ, Morton A, Sileo L, Audet DJ, Ottinger MA. 2003. Toxicity of lead contaminated sediment to mute swans. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 44:510-522.
23. DeForest DK, Schlekat CE, Brix KV, Fairbrother A. 2011. Secondary poisoning risk assessment of terrestrial birds and mammals exposed to nickel. Integr Environ Assess Manag 8:107-119.
24. Denys S, Tack K, Caboche J, Delalain P. 2008. Bioaccessibility, solid phase distribution, and speciation of Sb in soils and in digestive fluids. Chemosphere 74:711-716.
25. [DTSC] Department of Toxic Substances Control. 1996. Guidance for ecological risk assessment at hazardous waste sites and permitted facilities. California Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Toxic Substances Control, Human and Ecological Risk Division, Sacramento, CA.
26. [EC] European Commission. 2006. Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
27. [ECB] European Chemicals Bureau. 2008. European Risk Assessment Report: Nickel. European Chemicals Bureau. Ispra, Italy. [cited 2012 November 2]. Available from: http://esis.jrc.ec.europa.eu/doc/risk_assessment/REPORT/nickelreport311.pdf
28. [ECHA] European Chemicals Agency. 2008. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Appendix R.7.132: Environmental risk assessment for metals and metal compounds. [cited 2012 November 2]. Available from: http://echa.europa.eu/web/guest/guidance-documents/guidance-on-information-requirements-and-chemical-safety-assessment
29. Faber J, Ma WC. 1986. Observations on seasonal dynamics in diet composition of the field vole, Microtus agrestis, with some methodological remarks. Acta Theriol (Warsz) 31:479-490.
30. Fishwick S. 2004. Soil screening values for use in UK Ecological Risk Assessment. Environment Agency. Bristol, UK: Air Land and Water Group. 90 p.
31. Friberg L. 1984. Cadmium and the kidney. Environ Health Perspect 54:1-11.
32. Funes-Collado V, Rubio R, López-Sánchez JF. 2011. Comparison of in vitro PBET and phosphoric acid extraction as an approach to estimate selenite and selenate bioaccessibility from soil. Water Air Soil Pollut 222:315-324.
33. Furman O, Strawn DG, Heinz GH, Williams B. 2006. Risk assessment test for lead bioaccessibility to waterfowl in mine-impacted soils. J Environ Qual 35:450-458.
34. Garten CT Jr. 1980. Ingestion of soil by hispid cotton rats, white-footed mice, and eastern chipmunks. J Mammal 6:136-137.
35. Griffin JL, Walker LA, Shore RF, Nicholson JK. 2000. High-resolution magic angle spinning 1H-NMR spectroscopy studies on the renal biochemistry in the bank vole (Clethrionomys glareolus) and the effects of arsenic (As3 +) toxicity. Xenobiotica 31:377-385.
36. Gruar D, Peach W, Taylor R. 2003. Summer diet and body condition of song thrushes Turdus philomelos in stable and declining farmland populations. Ibis 145:637-649.
37. Heinz GH, Hoffman DJ, Sileo L, Audet DJ, LeCaptain LJ. 1999. Toxicity of lead contaminated sediments to mallards. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 36:323-333.
38. Hoffman DJ, Heinz GH, Sileo L, Audet DJ, Campbell JK, LeCaptain LJ, Obrecht HH III. 2000. Developmental toxicity of lead-contaminated sediment in Canada geese (Branta canadensis). J Toxicol Environ Health A 59:235-252.
39. Hoodless AN, Hirons GJM. 2007. Habitat selection and foraging behaviour of breeding Eurasian woodcock Scolopax rusticola: A comparison between contrasting landscapes. Ibis 149:234-249.
40. Hopkin SP. 1989. Ecophysiology of metals in terrestrial invertebrates. London, UK: Elsevier Applied Science. 366 p.
41. Hounsome T, O'Mahony D, Delahay R. 2004. The diet of little owls Athene noctua in Gloucestershire, England. Bird Study 51:282-284.
42. Intawongse M, Dean JR. 2008. Use of the physiologically-based extraction test to assess the oral bioaccessibility of metals in vegetable plants grown in contaminated soil. Environ Pollut 152:60-72.
43. Jefferie DJ. 1974. Earthworms in the diet of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes). J Zool 173:251-252.
44. Johnson MS, Wickwire WT, Quinn MJ, Ziolkowski DJ, Burmistrov D, Menzie CA, Geraghty C, Minnich M, Parsons PJ. 2007. Are songbirds at risk from lead at small arms ranges? An application of the Spatially Explicit Exposure Model (SEEM). Environ Toxicol Chem 26:2215-2225.
45. Kammenga JE, Spurgeon DJ, Svendsen C, Weeks JM. 2003. Explaining density-dependent regulation in earthworm populations using life-history analysis. Oikos 100:89-95.
46. Kaufman CA, Bennett JR, Koch I, Reimer KJ. 2007. Lead bioaccessibility in food web intermediates and the influence on ecological risk characterization. Environ Sci Technol 41:5902-5907.
47. Koch I, Reimer K. 2012. Bioaccessibility extractions for contaminant risk assessments. In: Pawliszyn J, Le XC, Li XF, Lee HK, editors. Comprehensive sampling and sample preparation Vol 3 Oxford, UK: Academic. p 487-507.
48. Lakhani KH, Satchell JE. 1970. Production by Lumbricus terrestris. J Anim Ecol 39:472-492.
49. Leung KMY, Bjorgesaeter A, Gray JS, Li WK, Lui GCS, Wang Y, Lam PKS. 2005. Deriving sediment quality guidelines from field-based species sensitivity distributions. Environ Sci Technol 39:5148-5156.
50. Loos M, Ragas AJM, Plasmeijer R, Schipper AM, Hendriks AJ. 2010. Eco-SpaCE: An object-oriented, spatially explicit model to assess the risk of multiple environmental stressors on terrestrial vertebrate populations. Sci Total Environ 408:3908-3917.
51. Mayfield DB, Fairbrother A. 2013. Efforts to standardize wildlife toxicity values remain unrealized. Integr Environ Assess Manag 9:114-123.
52. Mayfield DB, Johnson MS, Burris JA, Fairbrother A. 2013. Furthering the derivation of predictive wildlife toxicity reference values for use in soil cleanup decisions. Integr Environ Manag Assess Available from: DOI: 10.1002/ieam.1474
53. McGeer JC, Brix KV, Skeaff JM, DeForest DK, Brigham SI, Adams WJ, Green A. 2003. Inverse relationship between bioconcentration factor and exposure concentration for metals: Implications for hazard assessment of metals in the aquatic environment. Environ Toxicol Chem 22:1017-1037.
54. McLaughlin MJ, Zarcinas BA, Stevens DP, Cook N. 2000. Soil testing for heavy metals. Comm Soil Sci Plant Anal 31:1661-1700.
55. Melgar MJ, Alonso J, Garcia MA. 2009. Mercury in edible mushrooms and underlying soil: Bioconcentration factors and toxicological risk. Sci Total Environ 407:5328-5334.
56. Moriarty MM, Koch I, Reimer KJ. 2012. Arsenic speciation, distribution, and bioaccessibility in shrews and their food. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 62:529-538.
57. Nagy KA. 2001. Food requirements of wild animals: predictive equations for free-living mammals, reptiles, and birds. Nutr Abstr Rev B 71:21R-31R.
58. National Research Council. 2003. Bioavailability of contaminants in soils and sediments: Processes, tools, and applications. [cited 2012 November 2]. Available from: http://www.nap.edu/openbook/0309086256/html/
59. Nichols JW, Bennett RS, Rossmann R, French JB, Sappington KG. 2010. A physiologically based toxicokinetic model for methylmercury in female American kestrels. Environ Toxicol Chem 29:1854-1867.
60. Nicholson JK, Kendall MD, Osborn D. 1983. Cadmium and mercury nephrotoxicity. Nature 304:633-635.
61. [ODEQ] Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. 1998. Guidance for ecological risk assessment: levels I, II, III, IV. Waste Management and Cleanup Division. Portland (OR): Oregon Department of Environmental Quality.
62. Ollson CA, Koch I, Smith P, Knopper LD, Hough C, Reimer KJ. 2009. Addressing arsenic bioacessibility in ecological risk assessment: A novel approach to avoid overestimating risk. Environ Toxicol Chem 28:668-675.
63. Pauget B, Gimbert F, Scheifler R, Coeurdassier M, de Vaufleury A. 2012. Soil parameters are key factors to predict metal bioavailability to snails based on chemical extractant data. Sci Total Environ 431:413-425.
64. Roussel H, Waterlot C, Pelfrene A, Pruvot C, Mazzuca M, Douay F. 2010. Cd, Pb and Zn oral bioaccessibility of urban soils contaminated in the past by atmospheric emissions from two lead and zinc smelters. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 58:945-954.
65. Rowland M, Peck C, Tucker G. 2011. Physiologically-based pharmacokinetics in drug development and regulatory science. Ann Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 51:45-73.
66. Ruby MV, Davis A, Link TE, Schoof R, Chaney RL, Freeman GB, Bergstrom P. 1993. Development of an in vitro screening test to evaluate the in vivo bioaccessibility of ingested mine-waste lead. Environ Sci Technol 27:2870-2877.
67. Ruby MV, Davis A, Schoof R, Eberle S, Sellstone C. 1996. Estimation of lead and arsenic bioavailability using a physiologically based extraction test. Environ Sci Technol 30:422-430.
68. Rudawska M, Leski T. 2005. Trace elements in fruiting bodies of ectomycorrhizal fungi growing in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) stands in Poland. Sci Total Environ 339:103-115.
69. Ruiz P, Fowler BA, Osterloh JD, Fisher J, Mumtaz M. 2010. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) tool kit for environmental pollutants-metals. SAR QSAR Environ Res 21:603-618.
70. Ryti RT, Markwiese J, Mirenda R, Soholt L. 2004. Preliminary remediation goals for terrestrial wildlife. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 10:437-450.
71. Sample BE, Beauchamp JJ, Efroymson R, Suter GW II. 1999. Literature-derived bioaccumulation models for earthworms: Development and validation. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:2110-2120.
72. Sample BE, Hansen J, Dailey A, Duncan J. 2011. Assessment of risks to ground-feeding songbirds from lead in the Coeur d'Alene Basin, Idaho. Integr Environ Assess Manag 7:596-611.
73. Schipper AM, Wijnhoven S, Baveco H, van den Brink NW. 2012. Contaminant exposure in relation to spatio-temporal variation in diet composition: A case study of the little owl (Athene noctua). Environ Pollut 163:109-116.
74. Shore RF, Douben PET. 1994. The ecotoxicological significance of Cd intake and residues in terrestrial small mammals. Ecotox Environ Saf 29:101-112.
75. Sinha S, Gupta AK, Bhatt K, Pandey K, Rai UN, Singh KP. 2006. Distribution of metals in the edible plants grown at Jajmau, Kanpur (India) receiving treated tannery wastewater: Relation with physico-chemical properties of the soil. Environ Monit Assess 115:1-22.
76. Smolders E, Oorts K, Van Sprang P, Schoeters I, Janssen CJ, McGrath SP, McLaughlin MJ. 2009. Toxicity of trace metals in soil as affected by soil type and aging after contamination: Using calibrated bioavailability models to set ecological soil standards. Environ Toxicol Chem 28:1633-1642.
77. Sonne C, Gustavson K, Riget FF, Dietz R, Birkved M, Letcher RJ, Bossi R, Vorkamp K, Born EW, Petersen G. 2009. Reproductive performance in East Greenland polar bears (Ursus maritimus) may be affected by organohalogen contaminants as shown by physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling. Chemosphere 77:1558-1568.
78. Stockdale A, Tipping E, Lofts S, Ormerod SJ, Clements WH, Blust R. 2010. Toxicity of proton-metal mixtures in the field: Linking stream macroinvertebrate species diversity to chemical speciation and bioavailability. Aquat Toxicol 100:112-119.
79. Struijs J, De Zwart D, Posthuma L, Leuven RSEW, Huijbregts MAJ. 2011. Field sensitivity distribution of macroinvertebrates for phosphorus in inland waters. Integr Environ Assess Manag 7:280-286.
80. Suter GW II, Efroymson RA, Sample BE, Jones DS. 2000. Ecological risk assessment for contaminated sites. Boca Raton (FL): Lewis Publishers. 438 p.
81. [TCEQ] Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. 2006. Update to guidance for conducting ecological risk assessments at remediation sites in Texas RG-263 (Revised). Remediation Division. January. [cited 2013 January 10]. Available from: http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/assets/public/remediation/eco/0106eragupdate.pdf
82. Timchalk C, Nolan RJ, Mendrala AL, Dittenber DA, Brzak KA, Mattsson JL. 2002. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PBPK/PD) model for the organophosphate insecticide chlorpyrifos in rats and humans. Toxicol Sci 66:34-53.
83. Turner A, Hambling J. 2012. Bioaccessibility of trace metals in sediment, macroalga, and antifouling paint to the wild mute swan, Cygus olor. Water Air Soil Pollut 223:2503-2509.
84. [USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 1993. Wildlife exposure factors handbook. Volume I. Office of Research and Development. Washington, DC. EPA/600/R-93/187a.
85. [USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 1997. Ecological risk assessment guidance for Superfund: Process for designing and conducting ecological risk assessments, interim final. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. EPA 540-R-97-006.
86. [USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 2001. Final ecological risk assessment. Coeur d'Alene Basin Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study. Prepared by CH2M HILL and URS. Seattle (WA): USEPA Region 10.
87. [USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 2005a. Guidance for developing ecological soil screening levels. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, USEPA, Washington, DC. OSWER Directive 9285.7-55.
88. [USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 2005b. Ecological soil screening levels for lead: Interim final. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, USEPA, Washington, DC. OSWER Directive 9285.7-70.
89. [USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 2007a. Guidance for developing ecological soil screening levels. Exposure factors and bioaccumulation models for derivation of wildlife Eco-SSLs. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, USEPA, Washington, DC. OSWER Directive 9285.7-55.
90. [USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 2007b. Guidance for developing ecological soil screening levels. Review of background concentrations for metals. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, USEPA, Washington, DC. OSWER Directive 9285.7-55.
91. [USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 2007c. Guidance for evaluating the oral bioavailability of metals in soil for use in human health risk assessment. OSWER Directive 9285.7-80.
92. [USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 2007d. Framework for metals risk assessment. Office of the Science Advisor, Risk Assessment Forum. Office of the Science Advisor, Washington, DC. EPA 120/R-07/001.
93. Vasiluk L, Dutton MD, Hale B. 2011. In vitro estimates of bioaccessible nickel in field-contaminated soils, and comparison with in vivo measurements of bioavailability and identification of mineralogy. Sci Total Environ 409:2700-2706.
94. Veltman K, Huijbregts MAJ, Hamers T, Wijnhoven S, Hendriks AJ. 2007. Cadmium accumulation in herbivorous and carnivorous small mammals: Meta-analysis of field data and validation of the bioaccumulation model optimal modeling for ecotoxicological applications. Environ Toxicol Chem 26:1488-1496.
95. [WADOE] Washington State Department of Ecology. 2001. Model toxics control act cleanup regulation-Chapter 173-340 WAC. Toxics cleanup program. Publication 94-06.
96. Wheeler P. 2005. The diet of field voles Microtus agrestis at low population density in upland Britain. Acta Theriol (Warsz) 50:483-492.
97. Whitaker JO, Ruckdeschel C. 2006. Food of the southern short-tailed shrew (Blarina carolinensis) on Cumberland Island, Georgia. Southeast Nat 5:361-366.
98. Wickwire WT, Menzie CA, Burmistrov D, Hope BK. 2004. Incorporating spatial data into ecological risk assessments: the spatially explicit exposure module (SEEM) for ARAMS. In: Kapustka LA, Galbraith H, Luxon M, Biddinger GR, editors. Landscape ecology and wildlife habitat evaluation: Critical information for ecological risk assessment, land-use management activities, and biodiversity enhancement practices. ASTM STP 1458. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International.
99. Young JF, Wosilait WD, Luecke RH. 2001. Analysis of methylmercury disposition in humans utilizing a PBPK model and animal pharmacokinetic data. J Toxicol Environ Health A 63:19-52.
100. Zagury GJ, Bedeaux C, Welfringer B. 2009. Influence of mercury speciation and fractionation on bioaccessibility in soils. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 56:371-379.