Preliminary remediation goals for terrestrial wildlife

Human and Ecological Risk Assessment

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 437-450

  Ryti, Randall T ^a   Markwiese, James ^a   Mirenda, Richard ^b   Soholt, Lars ^b  

^a Neptune and Company Inc   (United States)

^b LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cleanup goal; Contaminated soil; Ecological screening assessment; Population effects

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; MAMMALIA;

EID: 4544382584     PISSN: 10807039     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10807030490438490     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bowman JA, Jaeger G, and Fahrig L. 2002. Dispersal distance of mammals is proportional to home range size. Ecology 83:2049-55
2. Efroymson RA, Suter GW, Sample BE, et al. 1997. Preliminary Remediation Goals for Ecological Endpoints. ES/ER/TM-162/R2. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN. Available at http://www.esd.ornl.gov/programs/ecorisk/documents/ tm162r2.pdf
3. Fuji T, Hope BK, Foxwell J, et al. 2000. Derivation of population-level ecological remedial action objectives: Tualatin River case study. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 6:1075-86
4. Gallegos AF, Gonzales GJ, Bennett KD, et al. 1996. Preliminary Ecological Risk Assessment of the Mexican Spotted Owl at the Los Alamos National Laboratory. Report LA-UR-96-3361. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA
5. Harestad AS and Bunnell FL. 1979. Home range and body weight - a re-evaluation. Ecology 60:389-402
6. Hope BK and Peterson JA. 2000. A procedure for performing population-level ecological risk assessments. Environ Manage 25:281-9
7. LANL (Los Alamos National Laboratory). 1999. Screening Level Ecological Risk Assessment Methods, Revision 1. Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LA-UR-99-1405, Los Alamos, NM, USA. Available at http://erproject.lanl.gov/ documents/librarydocs/SLERAfinal_rev1.pdf
8. LANL (Los Alamos National Laboratory). 2002. ECORISK Database (Release 1.5), ER Records Package #186, Environmental Restoration Project. Los Alamos, NM, USA
9. LANL (Los Alamos National Laboratory). 2003. Ecological Preliminary Remediation Goals for Soils at Los Alamos National Laboratory. Risk Reduction and Environmental Stewardship Division, Remediation Program Report LA-UR-03-2028. Los Alamos, NM, USA
10. Podolsky JS. 2000. Organic and Metal Contaminants in a Food Chain of the American Peregrine Falcon (Falco peregrinus) at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico. Master's Thesis. New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, USA
11. Ryti RT and Johnson AR. 2003. Possible application of dispersal distance information to ecological risk assessment. SETAC Globe, May/June Issue
12. Sample BE, Suter GWII, Beauchamp JJ, et al. 1999. Literature-derived bioaccumulation models for earthworms: Development and validation. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:2110-20
13. Suter GW, Efroymson RA, Sample BE, et al. 2000. Ecological Risk Assessment for Contaminated Sites. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, USA
14. Sutherland GD, Harestad AS, Price K, et al. 2000. Scaling of natal dispersal distances in terrestrial birds and mammals. Conserv Ecol 4(1):16. Available at http://www.consecol.org/vol4/iss1/art16/index.html
15. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 1993. Wildlife Exposure Factors Handbook. EPA/600/R-93/187a. Washington, DC, USA. Available at http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/cfm/recordisplay.cfm?deid=2799
16. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 1997. Ecological Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Process for Designing and Conducting Ecological Risk Assessments. Interim Final Report. EPA 540-R-97-006. Emergency Response Team, Edison, NJ, USA. Available at http://www.epa.gov/superfund/ programs/risk/ecorisk/ecorisk.htm
17. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 1998. Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessment. EPA/630/R095/002F. Risk Assessment Forum, Washington, DC, USA. Available at: http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/cfm/recordisplay. cfm?deid=12460
18. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 1999. Issuance of Final Guidance: Ecological Risk Assessment and Risk Management Principles for Superfund Sites. OSWER Directive 9285.7-28. Available at http://www.epa.gov/ superfund/programs/risk/ecorisk/final99.pdf
19. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 2003a. Draft Guidance for Developing Ecological Soil Screening Levels. OSWER Directive 92857-55. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/ecotox/ecossl/pdf/ecossl_guidance_chapters.pdf
20. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 2003b. Attachment 4-5: Ecological Soil Screening Level - Interim Final. EcoSSL Standard Operating procedure #6: Derivation of Wildlife Toxicity Reference Value (TRV). Available at: http://www.epa.gov/ecotox/ecossl/ pdf/ecossl_attachment_4-5.pdf
21. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 2003c. Attachment 4-1: Guidance for Developing Ecological Soil Screening Levels (EcoSSLs), Exposure Factors and Bioaccumulation Models for Derivation of Wildlife EcoSSL. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/ecotox/ ecossl/pdf/ecossl_attachment_4-1.pdf