Genomic analysis of dominance effects on milk production and conformation traits in Fleckvieh cattle

Genetics Selection Evolution

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Ertl, Johann ^a   Legarra, Andrés ^b   Vitezica, Zulma G ^b   Varona, Luis ^c   Edel, Christian ^a   Emmerling, Reiner ^a   Götz, Kay Uwe ^a  

^a Bavarian State Research Center for Agriculture   (Germany)

^b UMR1388 GenPhySE   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOS;

ALLELE; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BOVINAE; BREEDING; CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; LACTATION; MALE; METABOLISM; MILK; PEDIGREE; PHENOTYPE; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; BREEDING; CATTLE; FEMALE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC LOCI; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; LACTATION; MALE; MILK; MODELS, GENETIC; PEDIGREE; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84908397412     PISSN: 0999193X     EISSN: 12979686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-46-40     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC, Introduction to Quantitative Genetics Harlow: Pearson Education Limited 4 1996
2. Additive and nonadditive genetic variation for conformation traits in Canadian Holsteins. Tempelman RJ, Burnside EB, J Dairy Sci 1990 73 2214 2220 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(90)78901-1
3. Relationships among estimates of inbreeding depression, dominance and additive variance for linear traits in Holsteins. Misztal I, Lawlor TJ, Gengler N, Genet Sel Evol 1997 29 319 326 10.1186/1297-9686-29-3-319
4. Additive and nonadditive genetic variation for production traits in Canadian Holsteins. Tempelman RJ, Burnside EB, J Dairy Sci 1990 73 2206 2213 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(90)78900-X
5. Production traits of Holstein cattle: Estimation of nonadditive genetic variance components and inbreeding depression. Miglior F, Burnside EB, Kennedy BW, J Dairy Sci 1995 78 1174 1180 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(95)76735-2 7622728
6. Method R estimates of additive genetic, dominance genetic, and permanent environmental fraction of variance for yield and health traits of Holsteins. Van Tassell CP, Misztal I, Varona L, J Dairy Sci 2000 83 1873 1877 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)75059-4 10984165
7. Studies on the value of incorporating the effect of dominance in genetic evaluations of dairy cattle, beef cattle and swine. Misztal I, Varona L, Culbertson M, Bertrand JK, Mabry J, Lawlor TJ, Van Tassell CP, Gengler N, Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ 1998 2 227 233
8. Prediction of parental dominance combinations for planned matings, methodology, and simulation results. Varona L, Misztal I, J Dairy Sci 1999 82 2186 2191 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75463-9 10531605
9. A note on mate allocation for dominance handling in genomic selection. Toro MA, Varona L, Genet Sel Evol 2010 42 33 10.1186/1297-9686-42-33 20699012
10. Bayesian models with dominance effects for genomic evaluation of quantitative traits. Wellmann R, Bennewitz J, Genet Res (Camb) 2012 94 21 37 10.1017/S0016672312000018 22353246
11. Estimating additive and non-additive genetic variances and predicting genetic merits using genome-wide dense single nucleotide polymorphism markers. Su G, Christensen OF, Ostersen T, Henryon M, Lund MS, PLoS ONE 2012 7 45293 10.1371/journal.pone.0045293 23028912
12. On the additive and dominant variance and covariance of individuals within the genomic selection scope. Vitezica ZG, Varona L, Legarra A, Genetics 2013 195 1223 1230 10.1534/genetics.113.155176 24121775
13. Lactation yields and accuracies computed from test day yields and (co)variances by best prediction. VanRaden PM, J Dairy Sci 1997 80 3015 3022 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76268-4 9406095
14. The effective daughter contribution concept applied to multiple trait models for approximating reliability of estimated breeding values. Liu Z, Reinhardt F, Reents R, Interbull Bull 2001 27 41 47
15. Optimized aggregation of phenotypes for MA-BLUP evaluation in German Fleckvieh. Edel C, Emmerling R, Götz KU, Interbull Bull 2008 40 178 183
16. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. VanRaden PM, J Dairy Sci 2008 91 4414 4423 10.3168/jds.2007-0980 18946147
17. Efficient computation of the genomic relationship matrix and other matrices used in single-step evaluation. Aguilar I, Misztal I, Legarra A, Tsuruta S, J Anim Breed Genet 2011 128 422 428 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2010.00912.x 22059575
18. Bias in genomic predictions for populations under selection. Vitezica ZG, Aguilar I, Misztal I, Legarra A, Genet Res (Camb) 2011 93 357 366 10.1017/S001667231100022X 21767459
19. Compatibility of pedigree-based and marker-based relationship matrices for single-step genetic evaluation. Christensen OF, Genet Sel Evol 2012 44 37 10.1186/1297-9686-44-37 23206367
20. BLUPF90 and related programs (BGF90). Misztal I, Tsuruta S, Strabel T, Auvray B, Druet T, Lee DH, Proceedings of the 7th World Congress Applied to Livestock Production Montpellier: INRA 2002 28-07
21. A note on the asymptotic distribution of likelihood ratio tests to test variance components. Visscher PM, Twin Res Hum Genet 2006 9 490 495 10.1375/twin.9.4.490 16899155
22. Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to calculating posterior moments. Geweke J, Bayesian Statistics 4 Oxford: Clarendon Press, Bernado JM, Berger JO, Dawid AP, Smith AFM, 1992
23. R Development Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing 2011
24. CODA: Convergence diagnosis and output analysis for MCMC. Plummer M, Best N, Cowles K, Vines K, R News 2006 6 7 11
25. GS3 Genomic Selection-Gibbs Sampling-Gauss Seidel (and BayesCπ). Legarra A, Ricard A, Filangi O, http://genoweb.toulouse.inra.fr/∼alegarra/manualgs3-last.pdf
26. Performance of genomic selection in mice. Legarra A, Robert-Granié C, Manfredi E, Elsen JM, Genetics 2008 180 611 618 10.1534/genetics.108.088575 18757934
27. The large-sample distribution of the likelihood ratio for testing composite hypotheses. Wilks SS, Ann Math Stat 1938 9 60 62 10.1214/aoms/1177732360
28. Lynch M, Walsh JB, Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits Sunderland: Sinauer Associates, Inc. 1998
29. The contribution of dominance to the understanding of quantitative genetic variation. Wellmann R, Bennewitz J, Genet Res (Camb) 2011 93 139 154 10.1017/S0016672310000649 21481291
30. Imputation of high-density genotypes in the Fleckvieh cattle population. Pausch H, Aigner B, Emmerling R, Edel C, Götz KU, Fries R, Genet Sel Evol 2013 45 3 10.1186/1297-9686-45-3 23406470
31. Method R estimates of heritability for milk, fat, and protein yields of United States dairy cattle. Van Tassell CP, Wiggans GR, Norman HD, J Dairy Sci 1999 82 2231 2237 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75470-6 10531612
32. Estimation of variance components with large-scale dominance models. Misztal I, J Dairy Sci 1997 80 965 974 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76021-1
33. Effect of full sibs on additive breeding values under the dominance model for stature in United States Holsteins. Varona L, Misztal I, Bertrand JK, Lawlor TJ, J Dairy Sci 1998 81 1126 1135 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75675-9 9594402
34. Sire evaluation and genetic trends. Henderson CR, Proceedings of the Animal Breeding and Genetics Symposium in Honour of Dr. Jay L. Lush Champaign: American Society of Animal Science and American Dairy Science Association, American Society of Animal Science, American Dairy Science Association and Poultry Science Association, 1973 10 41