Bayesian models with dominance effects for genomic evaluation of quantitative traits

Genetics Research

Volumn 94, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 21-37

  Wellmann, Robin ^a   Bennewitz, Jörn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOHENHEIM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENOTYPE; HUMAN; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; INHERITANCE; MALE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; STOCHASTIC MODEL;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; CATTLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; GENES, DOMINANT; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; INBREEDING; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MARKOV CHAINS; MARRIAGE; MODELS, GENETIC; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; SELECTION, GENETIC; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES;

EID: 84857564737     PISSN: 00166723     EISSN: 14695073     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0016672312000018     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Bennewitz, J. & Meuwissen, T. H. E. (2010). The distribution of QTL additive and dominance effects in porcine F2 crosses. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 127, 171-179.
2. Caballero, A. & Keightley, P. D. (1994). A pleiotropic nonadditive model of variation in quantitative traits. Genetics 138, 883-900. (Pubitemid 24337813)
3. Calus, M. P. L. (2010). Genomic breeding value prediction: methods and procedures. Animal 4, 157-164.
4. Calus, M. P. L., Meuwissen, T. H. E., de Roos, A. P. W. & Veerkamp, R. F. (2008). Accuracy of genomic selection using different methods to define haplotypes. Genetics 178, 553-561. (Pubitemid 351398768)
5. Charlesworth, D. & Willis, J. H. (2009). The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nature Reviews Genetics 10, 783-796.
6. Chib, S. & Greenberg, E. (1995). Understanding the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm. American Statistical Association 49, 327-335. (Pubitemid 126008969)
7. Cockerham, C. C. (1954). An extension of the concept of partitioning hereditary variance for analysis of covariances among relatives when epistasis is present. Genetics 39, 859-882.
8. De Los Campos, G., Gianola, D. & Rosa, G. J. M. (2009). Reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces regression: a general framework for genetic evaluation. Journal of Animal Science 87, 1883-1887.
9. Duangjinda, M., Bertrand, J. K., Misztal, I. & Druet, T. (2001). Esimation of additive and nonadditive genetic variances in Hereford, Gelbvieh, and Charolais by Method R. Journal of Animal Science 79, 2997-3001. (Pubitemid 33721514)
10. Falconer, D. S. & Mackay, T. F. C. (1996). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. London, UK: Longman.
11. García-Dorado, A., López-Fanjul, C. & Caballero, A. (1999). Properties of spontaneous mutations affecting quantitative traits. Genetic Research Cambridge 74, 341-350. (Pubitemid 30076812)
12. Garrick, D. J., Taylor, J. F. & Fernando, R. L. (2009). Deregressing estimated breeding values and weighting information for genomic regression analyses. Genetics Selection Evolution 41, 55.
13. George, E. I. & McCulloch, R. E. (1993). Variable selection via Gibbs sampling. Journal of the American Statistical Association 88, 881-889.
14. Gianola, D. & de los Campos, G. (2008). Inferring genetic values for quantitative traits non-parametrically. Genetic Research 90, 525-540.
15. Gianola, D., Fernando, R. L. & Stella, A. (2006). Genomicassisted prediction of genetic value with semiparametric procedures. Genetics 173, 1761-1776. (Pubitemid 44127674)
16. Gianola, D. & van Kaam, J. B. C. H. M. (2008). Reproducing Kernel Hilbert spaces regression methods for genomic assisted prediction of quantitative traits. Genetics 178, 2289-2303.
17. Gianola, D., De Los Campos, G., Hill, W. G., Manfredi, E. & Fernando, R. (2009). Additive genetic variability and the Bayesian alphabet. Genetics 183, 347-363.
18. Grisart, B., Farnir, F., Karim, L., Cambisano, N., Kim, J. J., Kvasz, A., Mni, M., Simon, P., Frére, J.-M., Coppieters, W. & Georges, M. (2004). Genetic and functional confirmation of the causality of the GAT1 K232A quantitative trait nucleotide in affecting milk yield and composition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101, 2398-2403. (Pubitemid 38269323)
19. Habier, D., Tetens, J., Seefried, F.-R., Lichtner, P. & Thaller, G. (2010). The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle. Genetics Selection Evolution 42, 5.
20. Hayes, B. J., Bowman, P. J., Chamberlain, A. J. & Goddard, M. E. (2009). Invited review: genomic selection in dairy cattle : progress and challenges. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 433-443.
21. Hayes, B. J., Pryce, J., Chamberlain, A. J., Bowman, P. J. & Goddard, M. E. (2010). Genetic architecture of complex traits and accuracy of genomic prediction: coat colour, milk-fat percentage, and type in holsteincattle as contrasting model traits. PLoS Genetics 6, 31001139.
22. Heffner, E. L., Sorrells, M. E. & Jannink, J.-L. (2009). Genomic selection for crop improvement. Crop Science 49, 1-12.
23. Henderson, C. R. (1985). Best linear unbiased prediction of nonadditive genetic merits in noninbred populations. Journal of Animal Science 60, 111-117.
24. Hill, W. G., Goddard, M. E. & Visscher, P. M. (2008). Data and theory point to mainly additive genetic variance for complex traits. PLoS Genetics 4, e1000008.
25. Kacser, H. & Burns, J. A. (1981). The molecular basis of dominance. Genetics 97, 639-666. (Pubitemid 12224399)
26. Kempthorne, O. (1954). The correlation between relatives in a random mating population. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B 143, 103-113.
27. Legarra, A., Robert-Granié , C., Croiseau, P., Guillaume, F. & Fritz, S. (2011). Improved Lasso for genomic selection. Genetic Research Cambridge 93, 77-87.
28. Luan, T., Woolliams, J. A., Lien, S., Kent, M., Svendsen, M. & Meuwissen, T. H. E. (2009). The accuracy of genomic selection in norwegian red cattle assessed by cross-validation. Genetics 183, 1119-1126.
29. Meuwissen, T. H. E. (2009). Accuracy of breeding values of 'unrelated' individuals predicted by dense SNP genotyping. Genetics Selection Evolution 41, 35.
30. Meuwissen, T. H. E., Hayes, B. J. & Goddard, M. E. (2001). Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157, 1819-1829. (Pubitemid 32298846)
31. Meuwissen, T. H. E. & Goddard, M. E. (2004). Mapping multiple QTL using linkage disequilibrium and linkage analysis information and multitrait data. Genetics, Selection, Evolution 36, 261-279. (Pubitemid 38630134)
32. Meuwissen, T. H. E. & Goddard, M. E. (2010a). Accurate prediction of genetic values for complex traits by whole genome resequencing. Genetics 185, 623-631.
33. Meuwissen, T. H. E. & Goddard, M. E. (2010b). The use of family relationships and linkage disequilibrium to impute phase and missing genotypes in up to whole-genome sequence density genotypic data. Genetics 185, 1441-1449.
34. Misztal, I. (1997). Estimation of variance components with large-scale dominance models. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 965-974.
35. Ober, U., Erbe, M., Long, N., Porcu, E., Schlather, M. & Simianer, H. (2011). Predicting genetic values: a Kernelbased best linear unbiased prediction with genomic data. Genetics 188, 695-708.
36. Park, T. & Casella, G. (2008). The Bayesian Lasso. Journal of the American Statistical Association 103, 681-686.
37. Piepho, H. P. (2009). Ridge regression and extensions for genomewide selection in maize. Crop Science 49, 1165-1176.
38. Psarakis, S. & Panaretos, J. (1990). The folded t distribution. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 19, 2717-2734.
39. Rosa, G. J. M., Gianola, D. & Padovani, C. R. (2004). Bayesian longitudal data analysis with mixed models and thick-tailed distributions using MCMC. Journal of Applied Statistics 31, 855-873. (Pubitemid 39173838)
40. Serenius, T., Stalder, K. J. & Puonti, M. (2006). Impact of dominance effects on sow longevity. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 123, 355-361. (Pubitemid 44893332)
41. Shawe-Taylor, J. & Cristianini, N. (2004). Kernel Methods for Pattern Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Toro, M. A. & Varona, L. (2010). A note on mate allocation for dominance handling in genomic selection. Genetics Selection Evolution 42, 33.
43. Van Tassell, C. P., Misztal, I. & Varona, L. (2000). Method R estimates of additive genetic, dominance genetic, and permanent environmental fraction of variance for yield and health traits of holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 83, 1873-1877.
44. Verbyla, K. L., Hayes, B. J., Bowman, P. J. & Goddard, M. E. (2009). Accuracy of genomic selection using stochastic search variable selection in Australian Holstein Friesian dairy cattle. Genetics Research Cambridge 91, 307-311.
45. Verbyla, K. L., Bowman, P. J., Hayes, B. J. & Goddard, M. E. (2010). Sensitivity of genomic selection to using different prior distributions. BMC Proceedings 4 (Suppl. 1), S5.
46. Villa-Angulo, R., Matukumalli, L. K., Gill, C. A., Choi, J., Van Tassell, C. P. & Grefenstette, J. J. (2009). Highresolution haplotype block structure in the cattle genome. BMC Genetics 10, 19.
47. Wellmann, R. & Bennewitz, J. (2011). The contribution of dominance to the understanding of quantitative genetic variation. Genetics Research Cambridge 93, 139-154.
48. Wolc, A., Stricker, C., Arango, J., Settar, P., Fulton, J. E., O'Sullivan, N. P., Preisinger, R., Habier, D., Fernando, R., Garrick, D. J., Lamont, S. J. & Deckers, J. C. M. (2011). Breeding value prediction for production traits in layer chickens using pedigree or genomic relationships in a reduced animal model. Genetics Selection Evolution 43, 5.
49. Xu, S. (2003). Estimating polygenic effects using markers of the entire genome. Genetics 163, 789-801. (Pubitemid 36314558)
50. Yi, N., George, V. & Allison, D. B. (2003). Stochastic search variable selection for identifying multiple quantitative trait loci. Genetics 164, 1129-1138. (Pubitemid 36935686)