Efficient computation of the genomic relationship matrix and other matrices used in single-step evaluation

Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics

Volumn 128, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 422-428

  Aguilar, I ^a,b   Misztal, I ^a   Legarra, A ^c   Tsuruta, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIÓN AGROPECUARIA INIA   (Uruguay)

^c CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

Computing methods; Genomic selection; Relationship matrix

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; GENOMICS; METHODOLOGY; STATISTICAL MODEL; TIME;

ALGORITHMS; GENOMICS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; SOFTWARE; TIME FACTORS;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 80755163499     PISSN: 09312668     EISSN: 14390388     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2010.00912.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Aguilar I., Misztal I., Johnson D.L., Legarra A., Tsuruta S., Lawlor T.J. (2010) Hot topic: a unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score. J. Dairy Sci., 93, 743-752.
2. Anderson E., Bai Z., Dongarra J., Greenbaum A., McKenney A., Croz J.D., Hammerling S., Demmel J., Bischof C., Sorensen D. (1990). LAPACK: a portable linear algebra library for high-performance computers. In: Proceedings of the 1990 ACM/IEEE conference on Supercomputing, IEEE Computer Society Press, New York, New York, United States, pp. 2-11.
3. Astle W., Balding D. (2009) Population structure and cryptic relatedness in genetic association studies. Statistical Science, 24, 451-471.
4. Christensen O., Lund M. (2010) Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped. Genet. Sel. Evol., 42, 2.
5. Colleau J.J. (2002) An indirect approach to the extensive calculation of relationship coefficients. Genet. Sel. Evol., 34, 409-421.
6. Dongarra J.J., Croz J.D., Hammarling S., Hanson R.J. (1988) An extended set of FORTRAN basic linear algebra subprograms. ACM Trans. Math. Softw., 14, 1-17.
7. Dongarra J., Duff I., Sorensen D., Van Der Vorst H. (1990a) Solving linear systems on vector and shared memory computers. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
8. Dongarra J.J., Croz J.D., Hammarling S., Duff I.S. (1990b) A set of level 3 basic linear algebra subprograms. ACM Trans. Math. Softw., 16, 1-17.
9. Emik L.O., Terrill C.R. (1949) Systematic procedures for calculating inbreeding coefficients. J. Hered., 40, 51-55.
10. Hayes B.J., Bowman P.J., Chamberlain A.J., Goddard M.E. (2009) Invited review: genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges. J. Dairy Sci., 92, 433-443.
11. Kang H.M., Sul J.H., Service S.K., Zaitlen N.A., Kong S.-Y., Freimer N.B., Sabatti C., Eskin E. (2010) Variance component model to account for sample structure in genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet., 42, 348-354.
12. Legarra A., Aguilar I., Misztal I. (2009) A relationship matrix including full pedigree and genomic information. J. Dairy Sci., 92, 4656-4663.
13. Misztal I., Tsuruta S., Strabel T., Auvray B., Druet T., Lee D.H. (2002). BLUPF90 and Related Programs (BGF90). In: 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. Montpellier, France, 2002.
14. Misztal I., Legarra A., Aguilar I. (2009) Computing procedures for genetic evaluation including phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information. J. Dairy Sci., 92, 4648-4655.
15. Nejati-Javaremi A., Smith C., Gibson J.P. (1997) Effect of total allelic relationship on accuracy of evaluation and response to selection. J. Anim. Sci., 75, 1738-1745.
16. Tsuruta S., Misztal I., Stranden I. (2001) Use of the preconditioned conjugate gradient algorithm as a generic solver for mixed-model equations in animal breeding applications. J. Anim. Sci., 79, 1166-1172.
17. VanRaden P.M. (2007) Genomic Measures of Relationship and Inbreeding. Interbull Bull., 37, 33-36.
18. VanRaden P.M. (2008) Efficient Methods to Compute Genomic Predictions. J. Dairy Sci., 91, 4414-4423.
19. VanRaden P.M., Van Tassell C.P., Wiggans G.R., Sonstegard T.S., Schnabel R.D., Taylor J.F., Schenkel F.S. (2009) Invited Review: reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. J. Dairy Sci., 92, 16-24.
20. Whaley R.C., Dongarra J.J. (1998). Automatically tuned linear algebra software. In: Proceedings of the 1998 ACM/IEEE conference on Supercomputing (CDROM). IEEE Computer Society, San Jose, CA, pp. 38.