Facilitating skill development using student-directed activities and personalized formative feedback

Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning

Volumn 6, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 826-833

  Valdez, Connie ^a   Shea, Leticia ^b   Knutsen, Randy ^a   Hoody, Dorie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b REGIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Formative feedback; Self care; Student directed learning

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; LEARNING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT COUNSELING; PHARMACY STUDENT; SELF EVALUATION; TEACHING;

EID: 84908397150     PISSN: 18771297     EISSN: 18771300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cptl.2014.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. American College of Clinical Pharmacology A vision of pharmacy's future roles, responsibilities, and manpower needs in the United States. Pharmacotherapy 2000, 20(8):991-1020.
2. Medina M.S., Plaza C.M., Stowe C.D., et al. Center for the Advancement of Pharmacy Education (CAPE) educational outcomes 2013. Am J Pharm Educ 2013, 77(8). Article 162.
3. Cisneros R., Salisbury-Glennon J., Anderson-Harper H. Status of problem-based learning research in pharmacy education: a call for future research. Am J Pharm Educ 2002, 66(1):19-26.
4. Handbook of Nonprescription Drugs: An Interactive Approach to Self-Care 2009, APHA publications, Washington, DC. 17th ed. R.R. Berardi, L.A. Kroon, J.H. McDermott (Eds.).
5. Pungente M., Wasan K., Moffett C. Using learning styles to evaluate first-year pharmacy students' preferences toward different activities associated with the problem-based learning approach. Am J Pharm Educ 2003, 66(2):119-124.
6. Dictionary.com's 21st Century Lexicon. Learning style. (n.d.). Accessed July 30, 2014. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/learningstyle.
7. Austin Z. Learning styles of pharmacists: impact on career decisions, practice patterns and teaching method preferences. Pharm Educ 2004, 4(1):13-22.
8. Persky A. Multi-faceted approach to improve learning in pharmacokinetics. Am J Pharm Educ 2008, 72(2):1-7.
9. Smith M.K., Wood W.B., Adams W.K., et al. Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. Science 2009, 323(5910):122-124.
10. Knight J.K., Wood W.B. Teaching more by lecturing less. Cell Biol Educ 2005, 4(4):298-310.
11. Mazur E. Peer Instruction: A User's Manual 1997, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
12. Crouch C.H., Mazur E. Peer instruction: ten years of experience and results. Am J Phys 2001, 69(9):970-977.
13. Kotovsky K., Hayes J., Simon H. Why are some problems hard? Evidence from Tower of Hanoi. Cogn Psychol 1985, 17(2):248-294.
14. Storjohann T., Raney E., Pogge E., Cauthon K. Evaluation of peer-graded assignments in a skills-based course sequence. Curr Pharm Teach Learn 2013, 5(4):283-287.
15. O'Brien C.E., Franks A.M., Stowe C.D. Multiple rubric-based assessments of student case presentations. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008, 72(3). Article 5.
16. Valdez C.A., Thompson D., Ulrich H., et al. A comparison of pharmacy students' confidence and test performance. Am J Pharm Educ 2006, 70(4):1-8.