Bionic limbs: Clinical reality and academic promises

Science Translational Medicine

Volumn 6, Issue 257, 2014, Pages

  Farina, Dario ^a   Aszmann, Oskar ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^b MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARM MOVEMENT; ARM PROSTHESIS; BIONICS; BONE REGENERATION; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; LIMB PROSTHESIS; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; MOTOR CONTROL; MYOELECTRICALLY CONTROLLED PROSTHESIS; NERVE STIMULATION; NEUROPROSTHESIS; REVIEW; ROBOTICS; SENSORIMOTOR INTEGRATION; SENSORY FEEDBACK; COMPUTER SYSTEM; HAND; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; TOUCH;

ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; OSSEOINTEGRATION; TOUCH PERCEPTION;

EID: 84908374462     PISSN: 19466234     EISSN: 19466242     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3010453     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. D. S. Childress, Historical aspects of powered limb prostheses. Clin. Prosthet. Orthot. 9, 2-13 (1985).
2. N. Jiang, S. Dosen, K.-R. Muller, D. Farina, Myoelectric control of artificial limbs - Is there a need to change focus? IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 29, 150-152 (2012).
3. E. A. Biddiss, T. T. Chau, Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: A survey of the last 25 years. Prosthet. Orthot. Int. 31, 236-257 (2007).
4. S. Raspopovic, M. Capogrosso, F. M. Petrini, M. Bonizzato, J. Rigosa, G. Di Pino, J. Carpaneto, M. Controzzi, T. Boretius, E. Fernandez, G. Granata, C. M. Oddo, L. Citi, A. L. Ciancio, C. Cipriani, M. C. Carrozza, W. Jensen, E. Guglielmelli, T. Stieglitz, P. M. Rossini, S. Micera, Restoring natural sensory feedback in real-time bidirectional hand prostheses. Sci. Transl. Med. 6, 222ra19 (2014).
5. D. W. Tan, M. A. Schiefer, M. W. Keith, J. R. Anderson, J. Tyler, D. J. Tyler, A neural interface provides long-term stable natural touch perception. Sci. Transl. Med. 6, 257ra138 (2014).
6. M. Ortiz-Catalan, B. Ha˚kansson, R. Bra˚nemark, An osseointegrated human-machine gateway for long-term sensory feedback and motor control of artificial limbs. Sci. Transl. Med. 6, 257re6 (2014).
7. M. A. Lebedev, M. A. L. Nicolelis, Brain-machine interfaces: Past, present and future. Trends Neurosci. 29, 536-546 (2006).
8. T. A. Kuiken, L. A. Miller, R. D. Lipschutz, B. A. Lock, K. Stubblefield, P. D. Marasco, P. Zhou, G. A. Dumanian, Targeted reinnervation for enhanced prosthetic arm function in a woman with a proximal amputation: A case study. Lancet 369, 371-380 (2007).
9. K. Hagberg, R. Bra˚nemark, One hundred patients treated with osseointegrated transfemoral amputation prostheses - Rehabilitation perspective. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 46, 331-344 (2009).
10. J. Tillander, K. Hagberg, L. Hagberg, R. Bra˚nemark, Osseointegrated titanium implants for limb prostheses attachments: Infectious complications. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 468, 2781-2788 (2010).
11. P. F. Pasquina, M. Evangelista, A. J. Carvalho, J. Lockhart, S. Griffin, G. Nanos, P. McKay, M. Hansen, D. Ipsen, J. Vandersea, J. Butkus, M. Miller, I. Murphy, D. Hankin, First-in-man demonstration of a fully implanted myoelectric sensors system to control an advanced electromechanical prosthetic hand. J. Neurosci. Methods (2014). 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.07.016
12. A. Abbott, Neuroprosthetics: In search of the sixth sense. Nature 442, 125-127 (2006).
13. G. Di Pino, L. Denaro, G. Vadalà, A. Marinozzi, M. Tombini, F. Ferreri, R. Papalia, D. Accoto, E. Guglielmelli, V. Di Lazzaro, V. Denaro, Invasive neural interfaces: The perspective of the surgeon. J. Surg. Res. 188, 77-87 (2014).
14. A. Ninu, S. Dosen, S. Muceli, F. Rattay, H. Dietl, D. Farina, Closed-loop control of grasping with a myoelectric hand prosthesis: Which are the relevant feedback variables for force control? IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 22, 1041-1052 (2014).
15. J. G. Makin, M. R. Fellows, P. N. Sabes, Learning multisensory integration and coordinate transformation via density estimation. PLOS Comput. Biol. 9, e1003035 (2013).
16. K. C. Armel, V. S. Ramachandran, Projecting sensations to external objects: Evidence from skin conductance response. Proc. Biol. Sci. 270, 1499-1506 (2003).
17. H. Flor, L. Nikolajsen, T. Staehelin Jensen, Phantom limb pain: A case of maladaptive CNS plasticity? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 873-881 (2006).
18. H. Flor, T. Elbert, S. Knecht, C. Wienbruch, C. Pantev, N. Birbaumer, W. Larbig, E. Taub, Phantom-limb pain as a perceptual correlate of cortical reorganization following arm amputation. Nature 375, 482-484 (1995).
19. C. Dietrich, K. Walter-Walsh, S. Preissler, G. O. Hofmann, O. W. Witte, W. H. Miltner, T. Weiss, Sensory feedback prosthesis reduces phantom limb pain: Proof of a principle. Neurosci. Lett. 507, 97-100 (2012).