Spike sorting using locality preserving projection with gap statistics and landmark-based spectral clustering

Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Volumn 238, Issue , 2014, Pages 43-53

  Nguyen, Thanh ^a   Khosravi, Abbas ^a   Creighton, Douglas ^a   Nahavandi, Saeid ^a  

^a DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Feature extraction; Gap statistics; Landmark based spectral clustering; Locality preserving projection; Spike sorting; Superparamagnetic clustering; Wavelet transformation

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; LOCALITY PRESERVING PROJECTION; METHODOLOGY; PERFORMANCE; SPIKE; SPIKE SORTING; STATISTICS; ACTION POTENTIAL; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; NERVE CELL; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SIGNAL PROCESSING; WAVELET ANALYSIS;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ALGORITHMS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; NEURONS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; WAVELET ANALYSIS;

EID: 84908213749     PISSN: 01650270     EISSN: 1872678X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.09.011     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Adamos D.A., Laskaris N.A., Kosmidis E.K., Theophilidis G. In quest of the missing neuron: spike sorting based on dominant-sets clustering. Comput Methods Progr Biomed 2012, 107(1):28-35.
2. Blatt M., Wiseman S., Domany E. Data clustering using a model granular magnet. Neural Comput 1997, 9(8):1805-1842.
3. Brown E.N., Kass R.E., Mitra P.P. Multiple neural spike train data analysis: state-of-the-art and future challenges. Nat Neurosci 2004, 7(5):456-461.
4. Buzsáki G. Large-scale recording of neuronal ensembles. Nat Neurosci 2004, 7(5):446-451.
5. Chan H.L., Wu T., Lee S.T., Lin M.A., He S.M., Chao P.K., et al. Unsupervised wavelet-based spike sorting with dynamic codebook searching and replenishment. Neurocomputing 2010, 73(7):1513-1527.
6. Chen X., Cai D. Large scale spectral clustering with landmark-based representation. Proc. twenty-fifth AAAI conf. artificial intelligence 2011, 313-318.
7. DeVore R.A., Lucier B.J. Wavelets. Acta Numer 1992, 1(1):1-56.
8. Ekanadham C., Tranchina D., Simoncelli E.P. A unified framework and method for automatic neural spike identification. J Neurosci Methods 2014, 222:47-55.
9. Gibson S., Judy J.W., Markovic D. Spike sorting: the first step in decoding the brain. IEEE Signal Process Mag 2012, 29(1):124-143.
10. He X., Niyogi P. Locality preserving projections. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 2004, 16:37.
11. Hill D.N., Mehta S.B., Kleinfeld D. Quality metrics to accompany spike sorting of extracellular signals. J Neurosci 2011, 31(24):8699-8705.
12. Jung H.K., Choi J.H., Kim T. Solving alignment problems in neural spike sorting using frequency domain PCA. Neurocomputing 2006, 69(7):975-978.
13. Lai H.Y., Chen Y.Y., Lin S.H., Lo Y.C., Tsang S., Chen S.Y., et al. Automatic spike sorting for extracellular electrophysiological recording using unsupervised single linkage clustering based on grey relational analysis. J Neural Eng 2011, 8(3):036003.
14. Lewicki M.S. A review of methods for spike sorting: the detection and classification of neural action potentials. Netw: Comput Neural Syst 1998, 9(4):R53-R78.
15. Lloyd S. Least squares quantization in PCM. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 1982, 28(2):129-137.
16. Oliynyk A., Bonifazzi C., Montani F., Fadiga L. Automatic online spike sorting with singular value decomposition and fuzzy c-mean clustering. BMC Neurosci 2012, 13(1):96.
17. Pillow J.W., Shlens J., Chichilnisky E.J., Simoncelli E.P. A model-based spike sorting algorithm for removing correlation artifacts in multi-neuron recordings. PLOS ONE 2013, 8(5):e62123.
18. Quiroga R.Q., Nadasdy Z., Ben-Shaul Y. Unsupervised spike detection and sorting with wavelets and superparamagnetic clustering. Neural Comput 2004, 16(8):1661-1687.
19. Shalchyan V., Jensen W., Farina D. Spike detection and clustering with unsupervised wavelet optimization in extracellular neural recordings. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2012, 59(9):2576-2585.
20. Swindale N.V., Spacek M.A. Spike sorting for polytrodes: a divide and conquer approach. Front Syst Neurosci 2014, 8:6. 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00006.
21. Tibshirani R., Walther G., Hastie T. Estimating the number of clusters in a data set via the gap statistic. J R Stat Soc: Ser B (Stat Methodol) 2001, 63(2):411-423.
22. Tiganj Z., Mboup M. A non-parametric method for automatic neural spike clustering based on the non-uniform distribution of the data. J Neural Eng 2011, 8(6):066014.
23. Tiganj Z., Mboup M. Neural spike sorting using iterative ICA and a deflation-based approach. J Neural Eng 2012, 9(6):066002.
24. Vollgraf R., Munk M., Obermayer K. Optimal filtering for spike sorting of multi-site electrode recordings. Netw: Comput Neural Syst 2005, 16(1):85-113.
25. Wendl M.C., Yang S.P. Gap statistics for whole genome shotgun DNA sequencing projects. Bioinformatics 2004, 20(10):1527-1534.
26. Wild J., Prekopcsak Z., Sieger T., Novak D., Jech R. Performance comparison of extracellular spike sorting algorithms for single-channel recordings. J Neurosci Methods 2012, 203(2):369-376.
27. Yang C., Olson B., Si J. A multiscale correlation of wavelet coefficients approach to spike detection. Neural Comput 2011, 23(1):215-250.
28. Yin Z., Zhou X., Bakal C., Li F., Sun Y., Perrimon N., et al. Using iterative cluster merging with improved gap statistics to perform online phenotype discovery in the context of high-throughput RNAi screens. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9(1):264.
29. Yuan Y., Yang C., Si J. The M-Sorter: an automatic and robust spike detection and classification system. J Neurosci Methods 2012, 210(2):281-290.