Development of ultra-high-density screening tools for microbial "omics"

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Bean, Gordon J ^a   Jaeger, Philipp A ^a   Bahr, Sondra ^b   Ideker, Trey ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGAR;

ARTICLE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FUNGUS GROWTH; GENE DELETION; GENETIC SCREENING; NONHUMAN; ORGANISM COLONY; QUALITY CONTROL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; ULTRA HIGH DENSITY SCREENING;

ALGORITHMS; COLONY COUNT, MICROBIAL; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; HIGH-THROUGHPUT SCREENING ASSAYS; MUTATION; PROTEOMICS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 84908106870     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085177     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Uetz P, Giot L, Cagney G, Mansfield TA, Judson RS, et al. (2000) A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 403: 623-627. doi:10.1038/35001009. (Pubitemid 30103994)
2. Ito T, Chiba T, Ozawa R, Yoshida M, Hattori M, et al. (2001) A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 4569-4574. doi:10.1073/pnas.061034498. (Pubitemid 32295017)
3. Roguev A, Bandyopadhyay S, Zofall M, Zhang K, Fischer T, et al. (2008) Conservation and rewiring of functional modules revealed by an epistasis map in fission yeast. Science 322: 405-410. doi:10.1126/science.1162609.
4. Costanzo M, Baryshnikova A, Bellay J, Kim Y, Spear ED, et al. (2010) The genetic landscape of a cell. Science 327: 425-431. doi:10.1126/science.1180823.
5. Bandyopadhyay S, Mehta M, Kuo D, Sung M-K, Chuang R, et al. (2010) Rewiring of genetic networks in response to DNA damage. Science 330: 1385-1389. doi:10.1126/science.1195618.
6. Collins SR, Schuldiner M, Krogan NJ, Weissman JS (2006) A strategy for extracting and analyzing large-scale quantitative epistatic interaction data. Genome Biol 7: R63. doi:10.1186/gb-2006-7-7-r63.
7. Schuldiner M, Collins SR, Weissman JS, Krogan NJ (2006) Quantitative genetic analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using epistatic miniarray profiles (E-MAPs) and its application to chromatin functions. Methods 40: 344-352. doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2006.07.034. (Pubitemid 44712043)
8. Collins SR, Roguev A, Krogan NJ (2010) Quantitative genetic interaction mapping using the E-MAP approach. Meth Enzymol 470: 205-231. doi:10.1016/S0076-6879(10)70009-4.
9. Ryan CJ, Roguev A, Patrick K, Xu J, Jahari H, et al. (2012) Hierarchical modularity and the evolution of genetic interactomes across species. Mol Cell 46: 691-704. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.028.
10. Wagih O, Usaj M, Baryshnikova A, VanderSluis B, Kuzmin E, et al. (2013) SGAtools: one-stop analysis and visualization of array-based genetic interaction screens. Nucleic Acids Res 41: W591-W596. doi:10.1093/nar/gkt400.
11. Baryshnikova A, Costanzo M, Kim Y, Ding H, Koh J, et al. (2010) Quantitative analysis of fitness and genetic interactions in yeast on a genome scale. Nat Meth 7: 1017-1024. doi:10.1038/nmeth.1534.
12. Baryshnikova A, Costanzo M, Dixon S, Vizeacoumar FJ, Myers CL, et al. (2010) Synthetic genetic array (SGA) analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Meth Enzymol 470: 145-179. doi:10.1016/S0076-6879(10) 70007-0.
13. Bean GJ (2013) Colony Analyzer Toolkit. User Manual: 1-20.
14. Hillenmeyer ME, Fung E, Wildenhain J, Pierce SE, Hoon S, et al. (2008) The chemical genomic portrait of yeast: uncovering a phenotype for all genes. Science 320: 362-365. doi:10.1126/science.1150021. (Pubitemid 351555656)
15. Ho CH, Magtanong L, Barker SL, Gresham D, Nishimura S, et al. (2009) A molecular barcoded yeast ORF library enables mode-of-action analysis of bioactive compounds. Nat Biotechnol 27: 369-377. doi:10.1038/nbt.1534.