Canadian heart rhythm society and Canadian association of radiologists consensus statement on magnetic resonance imaging with cardiac implantable electronicdevices

Canadian Journal of Cardiology

Volumn 30, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 1131-1141

  Verma, Atul ^a   Ha, Andrew C T ^b   Dennie, Carole ^c   Essebag, Vidal ^d   Exner, Derek V ^e   Khan, Naeem ^f   Lane, Chris ^g   Leipsic, Jonathan ^h   Philippon, Francois ⁱ   Sampaio, Marcos ^c   Schieda, Nicola ^c   Seifer, Colette ^j   Berthiaume, Alain ^c   Campbell, Debra ^k   Chakraborty, Santanu ^c  

^a SOUTHLAKE REGIONAL HEALTH CENTRE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^d MCGILL UNIVERSITY HEALTH CENTRE   (Canada)

^e LIBIN CARDIOVASCULAR INSTITUTE OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^f IWK HEALTH CENTRE   (Canada)

^g ROYAL JUBILEE HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^h ST PAUL S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

ⁱ LAVAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^j ST BONIFACE GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^k KINGSTON GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CARDIAC IMPLANTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICE; DEVICES; HEART RHYTHM; HUMAN; IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; PACEMAKER; RADIOLOGIST; RADIOLOGY DEPARTMENT; AMBULATORY MONITORING; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; CONTRAINDICATIONS; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; INFORMED CONSENT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT SELECTION; RISK ASSESSMENT;

DEFIBRILLATORS, IMPLANTABLE; EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MONITORING, AMBULATORY; PACEMAKER, ARTIFICIAL; PATIENT SELECTION; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84908014939     PISSN: 0828282X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.07.010     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Loewy J., Loewy A., Kendall E.J. Reconsideration of pacemakers and MR imaging. Radiographics 2004, 24:1257-1267.
2. Kalin R., Stanton M.S. Current clinical issues for MR scanning of pacemaker and defibrillator patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005, 28:326-328.
3. Levine G.N., Gomes A.S., Arai A.E., et al. Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiovascular devices: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Circulation 2007, 116:2878-2891.
4. Woods T.O. Standards for medical devices in MR: present and future. JMagn Reson Imaging 2007, 26:1186-1189.
5. Nyenhuis J.A., Park S., Kamondetdacha R., et al. MR and implated medical devices: basic interactions with an emphasis on heating. IEEE Trans Device Materials Reliability 2005, 5:467-480.
6. Beinart R., Nazarian S. Effects of external electrical and magnetic fields on pacemakers and defibrillators: from engineering principles to clinical practice. Circulation 2013, 24:2799-2809.
7. Nazarian S., Beinart R., Halperin H.R. Magnetic resonance imaging and implantable devices. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2013, 6:419-428.
8. Sutton R., Kanal E., Wilkoff B.L. Safety of magnetic resonance imaging of patients with a new Medtronic EnRhythm MR SureScan pacing system: clinical study design. Trials 2008, 9:68.
9. Roguin A., Zviman M.M., Meininger G.R., et al. Modern pacemaker and implantable cardioverter/defibrillator systems can be magnetic resonance imaging safe. Invitro and invivo assessment of safety and function at 1.5T. Circulation 2004, 110:475-482.
10. Cronin E.M., Wilkoff B.L. Magnetic resonance imaging conditional pacemakers: rationale, development and future directions. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J 2012, 12:204-212.
11. Santini L., Forleo G.B., Santini M. World Society of Arrhythmias. Evaluating MRI-compatible pacemakers: patient data now paves the way to widespread clinical application?. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2013, 36:270-278.
12. Wilkoff B.L., Bello D., Taborsky M., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with a pacemaker system designed for the magnetic resonance environment. Heart Rhythm 2011, 8:65-73.
13. Gimbel J.R., Bello D., Schmitt M., et al. Randomized trial of pacemaker and lead system for safe scanning at 1.5 Tesla. Heart Rhythm 2013, 10:685-691.
14. Wollmann C.G., Steiner E., Vock P., Ndikung B., Mayr H. Monocenter feasibility study of the MR compatibility of the Evia pacemaker in combination with Safio S pacemaker lead. JCardiovasc Magn Reson 2012, 14:67.
15. Rickard J., Taborsky M., Bello D., et al. Short- and long-term electrical performance of the 5086MR pacing lead. Heart Rhythm 2014, 11:222-229.
16. Forleo G.B., Santini L., Della Rocca D.G., et al. Safety and efficacy of a new magnetic resonance imaging-compatible pacing system: early results of a prospective comparison with conventional dual-chamber implant outcomes. Heart Rhythm 2010, 7:750-754.
17. Elmouchi D.A., Rosema S., Vanoosterhout S.M., et al. Cardiac perforation and lead dislodgement after implantation of a MR-conditional pacing lead: a single-center experience. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2014, 37:4-10.
18. Rickard J., Wilkoff B. Extraction of implantable cardiac devices. Curr Cardiol Rep 2011, 13:407-414.
19. Quint D.J. Indications for emergent MR of the central nervous system. JAMA 2000, 283:853-855.
20. Pedrosa I., Levine D., Eyvazzadeh A.D., et al. MR imaging evaluation of acute appendicitis in pregnancy. Radiology 2006, 238:891-899.
21. Korley F.K., Pham J.C., Kirsch T.D. Use of advanced radiology during visits to US emergency departments for injury-related conditions, 1998-2007. JAMA 2010, 304:1465-1471.
22. Hartnell G.G., Spence L., Hughes L.A., et al. Safety of MR imaging in patients who have retained metallic materials after cardiac surgery. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997, 168:1157-1159.
23. Shellock F.G., Tkach J.A., Ruggieri P.M., Masaryk T.J. Cardiac pacemakers, ICDs, and loop recorder: evaluation of translational attraction using conventional ("long-bore") and "short-bore" 1.5- and 3.0-Tesla MR systems. JCardiovasc Magn Reson 2003, 5:387-397.
24. Gimbel J.R., Zarghami J., Machado C., Wilkoff B.L. Safe scanning, but frequent artifacts mimicking bradycardia and tachycardia during magnetic resonance imaging (MR) in patients with an implantable loop recorder (ILR). Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2005, 10:404-408.
25. Wong J.A., Yee R., Gula L.J., et al. Feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with an implantable loop recorder. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2008, 31:333-337.
26. Faris O.P., Shein M. Food and Drug Administration perspective: magnetic resonance imaging of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients. Circulation 2006, 114:1232-1233.
27. Smith J.M. Industry viewpoint: Guidant: pacemakers, ICDs, and MR. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005, 28:264.
28. Stanton M.S. Industry viewpoint: Medtronic: pacemakers, ICDs, and MR. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005, 28:265.
29. Levine P.A. Industry viewpoint: St. Jude Medical: pacemakers, ICDs and MR. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005, 28:266-267.
30. Hayes D.L., Holmes D.R., Gray J.E. Effect of 1.5 Tesla nuclear magnetic resonance imaging scanner on implanted permanent pacemakers. JAm Coll Cardiol 1987, 10:782-786.
31. Avery J.K. Loss prevention case of the month: not my responsibility!. JTenn Med Assoc 1988, 81:523.
32. Gimbel J.R. Implantable pacemaker and defibrillator safety in the MR environment: new thoughts for the new millennium. In: 2001 Syllabus, Special Cross-Specialty Categorical Course in Diagnostic Radiology: Practical MR Safety Considerations for Physicians, Physicists, and Technologists 2001, 69-76. Radiological Society of North America, Oak Lawn, IL.
33. Martin E.T., Coman J.A., Shellock F.G., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac pacemaker safety at 1.5-Tesla. JAm Coll Cardiol 2004, 43:1315-1324.
34. Gimbel J.R. Magnetic resonance imaging of implantable cardiac rhythm devices at 3.0 Tesla. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2008, 31:795-801.
35. Gimbel J.R. Unexpected asystole during 3T magnetic resonance imaging of a pacemaker-dependent patient with a 'modern' pacemaker. Europace 2009, 11:1241-1242.
36. Naehle C.P., Meyer C., Thomas D., et al. Safety of brain 3-T MR imaging with transmit-receive head coil in patients with cardiac pacemakers: pilot prospective study with 51 examinations. Radiology 2008, 249:991-1001.
37. Cohen J.D., Costa H.S., Russo R.J. Determining the risks of magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 Tesla for patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Am J Cardiol 2012, 110:1631-1636.