Pediatric video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscope: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Paediatric Anaesthesia

Volumn 24, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 1056-1065

  Sun, Yu ^a   Lu, Yi ^a   Huang, Yan ^a   Jiang, Hong ^a  

^a SHANGHAI SECOND MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

intubation; laryngoscope; meta analysis; pediatric; quality effects; video

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CERVICAL SPINE; DIRECT LARYNGOSCOPE; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; ESOPHAGUS INTUBATION; GLOTTIS; HUMAN; IATROGENIC DISEASE; LARYNGOSCOPE; META ANALYSIS; NASOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RIGID LARYNGOSCOPE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; VIDEOLARYNGOSCOPE; ADOLESCENT; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; CHILD; FEMALE; INFANT; LARYNGOSCOPY; MALE; NEWBORN; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PROCEDURES; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VIDEORECORDING;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; GLOTTIS; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; LARYNGOSCOPES; LARYNGOSCOPY; MALE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 84907988373     PISSN: 11555645     EISSN: 14609592     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/pan.12458     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Fiadjoe JE, Kovatsis P,. Videolaryngoscopes in pediatric anesthesia: what's new? Minerva Anestesiol 2014; 80: 76-82.
2. Sakles JC, Rodgers R, Keim SM,. Optical and video laryngoscopes for emergency airway management. Intern Emerg Med 2008; 3: 139-143.
3. ®) in 728 patients. Can J Anaesth 2005; 52: 191-198.
4. ®) in the management of a difficult airway. Can J Anaesth 2003; 50: 611-613.
5. Holm-Knudsen R,. The difficult pediatric airway-a review of new devices for indirect laryngoscopy in children younger than two years of age. Pediatr Anesth 2011; 21: 98-103.
6. Su YC, Chen CC, Lee YK, et al,. Comparison of video laryngoscopes with direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2011; 28: 788-795.
7. Redel A, Karademir F, Schlitterlau A, et al,. Validation of the glideScope video laryngoscope in pediatric patients. Pediatr Anesth 2009; 19: 667-671.
8. ® video laryngoscope: a randomized clinical trial in 203 paediatric patients. Br J Anaesth 2008; 101: 531-534.
9. Macnair D, Baraclough D, Wilson G, et al,. Pediatric airway management: comparing the Berci-Kaplan Video Laryngoscope with direct laryngoscopy. Pediatr Anesth 2009; 19: 577-580.
10. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al,. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009; 339: b2700.
11. van Tulder M, Furlan A, Bombardier C, et al,. Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the cochrane collaboration back review group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003; 28: 1290-1299.
12. Doi SAR, Thalib L,. A quality-effects model for meta-analysis. Epidemiology 2008; 19: 94-100.
13. ® with conventional laryngoscope in children. Minerva Anestesiol 2013; 79: 1366-1370.
14. ® video laryngoscope to traditional direct laryngoscopy in neonates and infants. Anesthesiology 2012; 116: 622-628.
15. Inal MT, Memis D, Kargi M, et al,. Comparison of TruView EVO2 with Miller laryngoscope in paediatric patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010; 27: 950-954.
16. ® videolaryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy for nasotracheal intubation in children. Pediatr Anesth 2011; 21: 417-421.
17. Nileshwar A, Garg V,. Comparison of Bullard laryngoscope and short-handled Macintosh laryngoscope for orotracheal intubation in pediatric patients with simulated restriction of cervical spine movements. Pediatr Anesth 2010; 20: 1092-1097.
18. ™ versus Macintoch laryngoscope in intubation performance in the pediatric population. Saudi J Anaesth 2012; 6: 332-335.
19. ® video laryngoscopes with direct laryngoscopy in pediatric patients: a randomized trial. Can J Anaesth 2013; 60: 450-457.
20. Singh R, Singh P, Vajifdar H,. A comparison of Truview infant EVO2 laryngoscope with the Miller blade in neonates and infants. Pediatr Anesth 2009; 19: 338-342.
21. Vlatten A, Aucoin S, Litz S, et al,. A comparison of the STORZ video laryngoscope and standard direct laryngoscopy for intubation in the Pediatric airway-a randomized clinical trial. Pediatr Anesth 2009; 19: 1102-1107.
22. Vlatten A, Fieldingb A, Bernard A, et al,. Comparison of the airtraq laryngoscope to the direct laryngoscopy in the pediatric airway. J Pediatr Intensive Care 2012; 2: 71-76.
23. ™ optical laryngoscope with conventional laryngoscopy in infants and children. Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 226-231.
24. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I,. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 2005; 5: 13.
25. Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman D,. Chapter 9: analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In:, Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.1.2. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.
26. Kattwinkel J, Perlman JM, Aziz K, et al,. Neonatal resuscitation: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Pediatrics 2010; 126: e1400-e1413.
27. Lu Y, Jiang H, Zhu YS,. Airtraq laryngoscope versus conventional Macintosh laryngoscope: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 1160-1167.
28. Holm-Knudsen RJ, White J,. The Airtraq may not be the solution for infants with difficult airways. Pediatr Anesth 2010; 20: 374-375.
29. Milne AD, Dower AM, Hackmann T,. Airway management using the pediatric GlideScope in a child with Goldenhar syndrome and atypical plasma cholinesterase. Pediatr Anesth 2007; 17: 484-487.
30. Bishop S, Clements P, Kale K, et al,. Use of GlideScope Ranger in the management of a child with Treacher Collins syndrome in a developing world setting. Pediatr Anesth 2009; 19: 695-696.
31. Vlatten A, Soder C,. Airtraq optical laryngoscope intubation in a 5-month-old infant with a difficult airway because of Robin Sequence. Pediatr Anesth 2009; 19: 699-700.
32. Iwai H, Kanai R, Takaku Y, et al,. Successful tracheal intubation using the pediatric Airtraq optical laryngoscope in a pediatric patient with Robin sequence. Masui 2011; 60: 189-191.
33. Wald SH, Keyes M, Brown A,. Pediatric video laryngoscope rescue for a difficult neonatal intubation. Pediatr Anesth 2008; 18: 790-792.
34. Hackell RS, Held LD, Stricker PA, et al,. Management of the difficult infant airway with the Storz Video Laryngoscope: a case series. Anesth Analg 2009; 109: 763-766.
35. White M, Weale N, Nolan J, et al,. Comparison of the Cobalt Glidescope video laryngoscope with conventional laryngoscopy in simulated normal and difficult infant airways. Pediatr Anesth 2009; 19: 1108-1112.
36. Fonte M, Oulego-Erroz I, Nadkarni L, et al,. A randomized comparison of the GlideScope videolaryngoscope to the standard laryngoscopy for intubation by pediatric residents in simulated easy and difficult infant airway scenarios. Pediatr Emerg Care 2011; 27: 398-402.
37. Armstrong J, John J, Karsli C,. A comparison between the GlideScope Video Laryngoscope and direct laryngoscope in paediatric patients with difficult airways-a pilot study. Anaesthesia 2010; 65: 353-357.
38. Vlatten A, Litz S, MacManus B, et al,. A comparison of the GlideScope video laryngoscope and standard direct laryngoscopy in children with immobilized cervical spine. Pediatr Emerg Care 2012; 28: 1317-1320.