Comparison of the Truview PCD™ and the GlideScope® video laryngoscopes with direct laryngoscopy in pediatric patients: A randomized trial

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia

Volumn 60, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 450-457

  Riveros, Ricardo ^a   Sung, Wai ^a   Sessler, Daniel I ^a   Sanchez, Ivan Parra ^a   Mendoza, Maria L ^a   Mascha, Edward J ^a   Niezgoda, Julie ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FENTANYL; MIDAZOLAM; NITROUS OXIDE; OXYGEN; PROPOFOL; ROCURONIUM; SEVOFLURANE; CARBON DIOXIDE;

ARTICLE; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORMACK LEHANE SCALE; END TIDAL CARBON DIOXIDE TENSION; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; GENERAL SURGERY; HUMAN; LARYNGOSCOPY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DEVICE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; NEWBORN; PEDIATRIC SURGERY; PHYSICAL CAPACITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RATING SCALE; REPEAT PROCEDURE; SCHOOL CHILD; SCORING SYSTEM; TIME; VIDEOLARYNGOSCOPE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; EQUIPMENT; FOLLOW UP; INFANT; LARYNGOSCOPE; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PRESCHOOL CHILD;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LARYNGOSCOPES; LARYNGOSCOPY; MALE; TIME FACTORS; VIDEO-ASSISTED SURGERY;

EID: 84886607368     PISSN: 0832610X     EISSN: 14968975     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12630-013-9906-x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Li JB, Xiong YC, Wang XL, et al. An evaluation of the TruView EVO2 laryngoscope. Anaesthesia 2007; 62: 940-3.
2. Barak M, Philipchuck P, Abecassis P, Katz Y. A comparison of the Truview blade with the Macintosh blade in adult patients. Anaesthesia 2007; 62: 827-31.
3. Cooper RM, Pacey JA, Bishop MJ, McCluskey SA. Early clinical experience with a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope) in 728 patients. Can J Anesth 2005; 52: 191-8.
4. Kim JT, Na HS, Bae JY, et al. GlideScope video laryngoscope: a randomized clinical trial in 203 paediatric patients. Br J Anaesth 2008; 101: 531-4.
5. Singh R, Singh P, Vajifdar H. A comparison of Truview infant EVO2 laryngoscope with the Miller blade in neonates and infants. Paediatr Anaesth 2009; 19: 338-42.
6. Berger RL. Multiparameter hypothesis testing and acceptance sampling. Technometrics 1982; 24: 295-300.
7. Mascha EJ, Turan A. Joint hypothesis testing and gatekeeping procedures for studies with multiple endpoints. Anesth Analg 2012; 114: 1304-17.
8. Gardner MJ, Altman DG. Statistics with Confidence. London: British Medical Journal; 1989.
9. Hwang IK, Shih WJ, De Cani JS. Group sequential designs using a family of type I error probability spending functions. Stat Med 1990; 9: 1439-45.
10. Fiadjoe JE, Gurnaney H, Dalesio N, et al. A prospective randomized equivalence trial of the GlideScope Cobalt video laryngoscope to traditional direct laryngoscopy in neonates and infants. Anesthesiology 2012; 116: 622-8.
11. Hirabayashi Y, Fujita A, Seo N, Sugimoto H. Cervical spine movement during laryngoscopy using the Airway Scope compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope. Anesthesiology 2007; 62: 1050-5.
12. Aziz MF, Dillman D, Fu R, Brambrink AM. Comparative effectiveness of the C-MAC video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscopy in the setting of the predicted difficult airway. Anesthesiology 2012; 116: 629-36.
13. Jungbauer A, Schumann M, Brunkhorst V, Borgers A, Groeben H. Expected difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective comparison of direct laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy in 200 patients. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102: 546-50.
14. Enomoto Y, Asai T, Arai T, Kamishima K, Okuda Y. Pentax-AWS, a new videolaryngoscope, is more effective than the Macintosh laryngoscopes for tracheal intubation in patients with restricted neck movements: a randomized comparative study. Br J Anaesth 2008; 2008(100): 544-8.
15. Malik MA, Subramaniam R, Maharaj CH, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Randomized controlled trial of the Pentax AWS, Glidescope and Macintosh laryngoscopes in predicted difficult intubation. Br J Anaesth 2009; 103: 761-8.
16. Lim Y, Lim TJ, Liu EH. Ease of intubation with the GlideScope or Macintosh laryngscope by inexperienced operators in simulated difficult airways. Can J Anesth 2004; 51: 641-2.
17. Eaton J, Atiles R, Tuchman JB. GlideScope for management of difficult airway in a child with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. Pediatr Anesth 2009; 19: 696-8.
18. Wald S, Keyes M, Brown A. Pediatric video laryngoscope rescue for a difficult neonatal intubation. Pediatr Anesth 2008; 18: 790-2.
19. Xue FS, Tian M, Liao X, Xu YC. Safe and successful intubation using a Storz video laryngoscope in management of pediatric difficult airways. Pediatr Anesth 2008; 18: 1251-2.
20. Xue FS, Tian M, Liao X, Xu Y. Safe and successful intubation using the GlideScope videolaryngoscope in children with craniofacial anomalies. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 123: 1127-9.
21. Bishop S, Clements P, Kale K, Tremlett MR. Use of GlideScope Ranger in the managment of a child with Treacher Collins syndrome in a developing world setting. Pediatr Anesth 2009; 19: 695-6.
22. Taub PJ, Silver L, Gooden CK. Use of the GlideScope for airway management in patients with craniofacial anomalies. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121: 237e-8e.
23. Austin PC. Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Stat Med 2009; 28: 3083-107.