From barcoding single individuals to metabarcoding biological communities: Towards an integrative approach to the study of global biodiversity

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 29, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 566-571

  Cristescu, Melania E ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

DNA barcoding; Environmental DNA (eDNA); Metabarcoding; Second generation sequencing; Sequence biodiversity; Taxonomy crisis

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; BIOINFORMATICS; DNA; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; GENOMICS; GLOBAL CHANGE; HABITAT CONSERVATION; INTEGRATED APPROACH; PIPELINE;

DNA;

BIODIVERSITY; BIOLOGY; BIOTA; DNA BARCODING; GENETICS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING; BIODIVERSITY; BIOTA; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DNA; DNA BARCODING, TAXONOMIC; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84907982044     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.08.001     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Brook B.W., et al. Synergies among extinction drivers under global change. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2008, 23:453-460.
2. Barnosky A.D., et al. Has the Earth's sixth mass extinction already arrived?. Nature 2011, 471:51-57.
3. Larigauderie A., et al. Biodiversity and ecosystem services science for a sustainable planet: the DIVERSITAS vision for 2012-20. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sust. 2012, 4:101-105.
4. Nanney D.L. Genes and phenes in Tetrahymena. BioScience 1982, 32:783-788.
5. Gibson W.C., et al. Species-specific DNA probes for the identification of African trypanosomes in tsetse flies. Parasitology 1988, 97:63-73.
6. Arnot D.E., et al. Digital codes from hypervariable tandemly repeated DNA sequences in the Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite gene can genetically barcode isolates. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 1993, 61:15-24.
7. Hebert P.D.N., et al. Biological identification through DNA barcodes. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2003, 270:313-321.
8. Blaxter M. Molecular systematics - counting angels with DNA. Nature 2003, 421:122-124.
9. DeSalle R. Phenetic and DNA taxonomy; a comment on Waugh. Bioessays 2007, 29:1289-1290.
10. Ratnasingham S., Hebert P.D.N. BOLD: the barcode of life data system. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2007, 7:355-364.
11. Taberlet P., et al. Towards next-generation biodiversity assessment using DNA metabarcoding. Mol. Ecol. 2012, 21:2045-2050.
12. Taylor H.R., Harris W.E. An emergent science on the brink of irrelevance: a review of the past 8 years of DNA barcoding. Mol. Ecol. Res. 2012, 12:377-388.
13. Valentini A., et al. DNA barcoding for ecologists. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009, 24:110-117.
14. Clare E.L., et al. Trophic niche flexibility in Glossophaga soricina: how a nectar seeker sneaks an insect snack. Funct. Ecol. 2014, 28:632-641.
15. Borisenko A.V., et al. The front-end logistics of DNA barcoding: challenges and prospects. Mol. Ecol. Res. 2009, 9:27-34.
16. Ji Y., et al. Reliable, verifiable and efficient monitoring of biodiversity via metabarcoding. Ecol. Lett. 2013, 16:1245-1257.
17. Bohmann K., et al. Environmental DNA for wildlife biology and biodiversity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2014, 29:358-367.
18. Gibson J., et al. Simultaneous assessment of the macrobiome and microbiome in a bulk sample of tropical arthropods through DNA metasystematics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2014, 111:8007-8012.
19. Bik H.M., et al. Sequencing our way towards understanding global eukaryotic biodiversity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2012, 27:233-243.
20. McPherson J.D. Next-generation gap. Nat. Methods 2009, 6:S2-S5.
21. Ratnasingham S., Hebert P.D.N. A DNA-based registry for all animal species: the Barcode Index Number (BIN) System. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e66213.
22. Thomas T., et al. Metagenomics - a guide from sampling to data analysis. Microb. Inform. Exp. 2012, 2:3.
23. Matsen F.A., et al. pplacer: linear time maximum-likelihood and Bayesian phylogenetic placement of sequences onto a fixed reference tree. BMC Bioinformatics 2010, 11:538.
24. Blaxter M., et al. Defining operational taxonomic units using DNA barcode data. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2005, 360:1935-1943.
25. Taib N., et al. Phylogenetic affiliation of SSU rRNA genes generated by massively parallel sequencing: new insights into the freshwater protist diversity. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e58950.
26. Hollingsworth M.L., et al. Selecting barcoding loci for plants: evaluation of seven candidate loci with species-level sampling in three divergent groups of land plants. Mol. Ecol. Res. 2009, 9:439-457.
27. Coissac E., et al. Bioinformatic challenges for DNA metabarcoding of plants and animals. Mol. Ecol. 2012, 21:1834-1847.
28. Tang C.Q., et al. The widely used small subunit 18S rDNA molecule greatly underestimates true diversity in biodiversity surveys of the meiofauna. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:16208-16212.
29. Bonder M.J., et al. Comparing clustering and pre-processing in taxonomy analysis. Bioinformatics 2012, 28:2891-2897.
30. Caporaso J.G., et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 2010, 7:335-336.
31. Edgar R.C. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat. Methods 2013, 10:996-998.
32. Sogin M.L., et al. Microbial diversity in the deep sea and the underexplored 'rare biosphere'. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:12115-12120.
33. Kunin V., et al. Wrinkles in the rare biosphere: pyrosequencing errors can lead to artificial inflation of diversity estimates. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 12:118-123.
34. Bachy C., et al. Accuracy of protist diversity assessments: morphology compared with cloning and direct pyrosequencing of 18S rRNA genes and ITS regions using the conspicuous tintinnid ciliates as a case study. ISME J. 2013, 7:244-255.
35. Behnke A., et al. Depicting more accurate pictures of protistan community complexity using pyrosequencing of hypervariable SSU rRNA gene regions. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 13:340-349.
36. Wägele H., et al. The taxonomist - an endangered race. A practical proposal for its survival. Front. Zool. 2011, 8:25.
37. Janzen D.H., et al. Wedding biodiversity inventory of a large and complex Lepidoptera fauna with DNA barcoding. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2005, 360:1835-1845.
38. Hebert P.D.N., Barrett R.D.H. Reply to the comment by L. Prendini on 'Identifying spiders through DNA barcodes'. Can. J. Zool. 2005, 83:505-506.
39. Hebert P.D.N., Gregory R.T. The promise of DNA barcoding for taxonomy. Syst. Biol. 2005, 54:852-859.
40. Barnosky A.D., et al. Approaching a state in Earth's biosphere. Nature 2012, 486:52-58.
41. Bottrill M.C., et al. Is conservation triage just smart decision making?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2008, 23:649-654.
42. Goldstein P.Z., DeSalle R. Integrating DNA barcode data and taxonomic practice: determination, discovery, and description. Bioessays 2010, 33:135-147.
43. Floyd R., et al. Molecular barcodes for soil nematode identification. Mol. Ecol. 2002, 11:839-850.
44. Sneath P.H.A., Sokal R.R. Numerical Taxonomy. The Principles And Practice Of Numerical Classification 1973, W.H. Freeman.
45. Wooley J.C., et al. A primer on metagenomics. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2010, 6:e1000667.
46. Sun Y., et al. A large-scale benchmark study of existing algorithms for taxonomy-independent microbial community analysis. Brief. Bioinform. 2012, 13:107-121.
47. Hebert P.D.N., et al. Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2003, 270:96-99.
48. Droege G., et al. The global genome biodiversity network (GGBN) data portal. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 42:D607-D612.
49. Henry P-Y., et al. Integrating ongoing biodiversity monitoring: potential benefits and methods. Biodivers. Conserv. 2008, 17:3357-3382.