Complex problem solving in chemistry: A domain-specific approach;Komplexes problemlösen im fach chemie: Ein domänenspezifischer zugang

Zeitschrift fur Padagogische Psychologie

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 181-192

  Scherer, Ronny ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

Complex problem solving competence; Computer based assessment; Domain specificity; Scientific inquiry

Indexed keywords

EID: 84907951627     PISSN: 10100652     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1024/1010-0652/a000136     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Baumert, J., Lüdtke, O., Trautwein, U. & Brunner, M. (2009). Large-scale student assessment studies measure the results of processes of knowledge acquisition: Evidence in support of the distinction between intelligence and student achievement. Educational Research Review, 4, 165-176.
2. Beckmann, J. & Goode, N. (2014). The benefit of being naïve and knowing it: the unfavourable impact of perceived context familiarity on learning in complex problem solving tasks. Instructional Science, 42, 271-290.
3. Dunbar, K. & Klahr, D. (2012). Scientific thinking and reasoning. In K. Holyoak, & R. Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning (pp. 701-718). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Enders, C. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
5. Funke, J. (2010). Complex problem solving: A case for complex cognition? Cognitive Processing, 11, 133-142.
6. Gelman, R. (1996). Domain specificity in cognitive development: universals and nonuniversals. In M. Sabourin, F. Craik & M. Robert (Eds.), Advances in Psychological Science (vol. 2, pp. 557-579). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
7. Greiff, S. & Fischer, A. (2013). Der Nutzen einer komplexen Problemlösekompetenz: Theoretische Überlegungen und empirische Befunde. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 27, 27-39.
8. Greiff, S., Kretzschmar, A. & Leutner, D. (2014). Problemlösen in der Pädagogischen Psychologie. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 28, 161-166.
9. Greiff, S., Wüstenberg, S., Molnár, G., Fischer, A., Funke, J. & Csapó, B. (2013). Complex problem solving in educational contexts - something beyond g: Concept, assessment, measurement invariance, and construct validity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 364-379.
10. Hammann, M., Phan, T. H. & Bayrhuber, H. (2008). Experimentieren als Problemlösen: Lässt sich das SDDS-Modell nutzen, um unterschiedliche Dimensionen beim Experimentieren zu messen? Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, Sonderheft 8, 33-49.
11. Heller, K. & Perleth, C. (2000). Kognitiver Fähigkeitstest für 4. bis 12. Klassen, Revision. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
12. Hofstein, A. & Lunetta, V. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twentyfirst century. Science Education, 88, 28-54.
13. Jonassen, D. (2011). Learning to Solve Problems. New York, NY: Routledge.
14. Kauertz, A., Fischer, H., Mayer, J., Sumfleth, E. & Walpuski, M. (2010). Standardbezogene Kompetenzmodellierung in den naturwissenschaftlichen Fächern der Sekundarstufe I. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 16, 135-153.
15. Kiefer, T., Robitzsch, A. & Wu, M. (2013). TAM - Test Analysis Modules. R package version 0.7-35. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/TAM/index.html
16. Kind, P. (2013). Establishing assessment scales using a novel disciplinary rationale for scientific reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 530-560.
17. Kolen, M. & Brennan, R. (2014). Test Equating, Scaling, and Linking (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
18. Koppelt, J. (2011). Modellierung dynamischer Problemlösekompetenz im Chemieunterricht. Berlin: Mensch & Buch.
19. Kuhn, D. (2009). Do students need to be taught how to reason? Educational Research Review, 4, 1-6.
20. Künsting, J., Kempf, J. & Wirth, J. (2013). Enhancing scientific discovery learning by metacognitive support. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 348-360.
21. Lehmann, W., Jüling, I. & Knopf, H. (2002). Allgemeine und domänenspezifische kognitive Leistungen. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 16, 29-41.
22. Leutner, D., Fleischer, J., Wirth, J., Greiff, S. & Funke, J. (2012). Analytische und dynamische Problemlösekompetenz im Lichte internationaler Schulleistungsvergleichsstudien. Psychologische Rundschau, 63, 34-42.
23. Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741-749.
24. Millsap, R. (2011). Statistical Approaches to Measurement Invariance. New York, NY: Routledge.
25. Molnár, G., Greiff, S. & Csapó, B. (2013). Inductive reasoning, domain specific and complex problem solving: Relations and development. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 9, 35-45.
26. Muthén, B. & Muthén, L. (1998-2013). Mplus 7.1. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
27. Nagy, G. & Neumann, M. (2010). Psychometrische Aspekte des Tests zu voruniversitären Mathematikleistungen in TOSCA-2002 und TOSCA-2006: Unterrichtsvalidität, Rasch-Homogenität und Messäquivalenz. In U. Trautwein, M. Neumann, G. Nagy, O. Lüdtke & K. Maaz (Hrsg.), Schulleistungen von Abiturienten (S. 281-306). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
28. O'Brien, R. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41, 673-690.
29. OECD (2013). PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework. Paris: OECD.
30. Osborne, J. (2013). The 21st century challenge for science education: Assessing scientific reasoning. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 265-279.
31. Paek, I., Baek, S. & Wilson, M. (2012). An IRT modeling of change over time for repeated measures item response data using a random weights linear logistic test model approach. Asia Pacific Education Review, 13, 487-494.
32. Renkl, A. (2012). Modellierung von Kompetenzen oder von interindividuellen Kompetenzunterschieden. Psychologische Rundschau, 63, 50-53.
33. Scherer, R. (2012). Analyse der Struktur, Messinvarianz und Ausprägung komplexer Problemlösekompetenz im Fach Chemie. Berlin: Logos.
34. Scherer, R. & Tiemann, R. (2012). Factors of problem-solving competency in a virtual chemistry environment: The role of metacognitive knowledge about strategies. Computers & Education, 59, 1199-1214.
35. Scherer, R. & Tiemann, R. (2014). The development of scientific strategy knowledge across grades. SAGE Open, 4, 1-14.
36. Schmidt-Weigand, F., Hänze, M. & Wodzinski, R. (2009). Complex problem solving and worked examples. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 23, 129-138.
37. Schneider, W. (2010). The development of metacognitive competencies. In B. Glatzeder, V. Goel, & A. Müller (Eds.), Towards a Theory on Thinking (pp. 203-214). Berlin: Springer.
38. Sonnleitner, P., Keller, U., Martin, R. & Brunner, M. (2013). Students' complex problem-solving abilities: Their structure and relations to reasoning ability and educational success. Intelligence, 41, 289-305.
39. Sparfeldt, J., Buch, S., Rost, D. H. & Lehmann, G. (2008). Akkuratesse selbstberichteter Zensuren. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 55, 68-75.
40. Sternberg, R. (2009). Domain-Generality versus domain-specificity of creativity. In P. Meusburger, J. Funke & E. Wunder (Eds.), Milieus of Creativity (pp. 25-38). Heidelberg: Springer.
41. Süß, H.-M., Kersting, M. & Oberauer, K. (1992). The role of intelligence and knowledge in complex problem-solving. The German Journal of Psychology, 16, 269-270.
42. Van Merriënboer, J. (2013). Perspectives on problem solving and instruction. Computers & Education, 64, 153-160.
43. Wu, M. (2005). The role of plausible values in large-scale surveys. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 31, 114-128.
44. Wüstenberg, S., Greiff, S. & Funke, J. (2012). Complex problem solving? More than reasoning? Intelligence, 40, 1-14.