The selective interaction between silica nanoparticles and enzymes from molecular dynamics simulations

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 9, 2014, Pages

  Sun, Xiaotian ^a   Feng, Zhiwei ^a   Zhang, Liling ^a   Hou, Tingjun ^a   Li, Youyong ^a  

^a SOOCHOW UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINE; CARBOXYL GROUP; CYTOCHROME C; ENZYME; HYDROXYL GROUP; LYSOZYME; METHYL GROUP; NANOPARTICLE; RIBONUCLEASE A; SILICA NANOPARTICLE; SILICON DIOXIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; PANCREATIC RIBONUCLEASE;

ADSORPTION; ALPHA HELIX; ARTICLE; BETA SHEET; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; MATERIAL COATING; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; SURFACE PROPERTY; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM;

CYTOCHROMES C; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; MURAMIDASE; NANOPARTICLES; RIBONUCLEASE, PANCREATIC; SILICON DIOXIDE;

EID: 84907912466     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107696     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Luckarift HR, Spain JC, Naik RR, Stone MO (2004) Enzyme immobilization in a biomimetic silica support. Nature biotechnology 22: 211-213.
2. Kirk O, Borchert TV, Fuglsang CC (2002) Industrial enzyme applications. Curr Opin Biotech 13: 345-351.
3. Jin L, Yang K, Yao K, Zhang S, Tao H, et al. (2012) Functionalized Graphene Oxide in Enzyme Engineering: A Selective Modulator for Enzyme Activity and Thermostability. ACS nano 6: 4864-4875.
4. Wu J-F, Xu M-Q, Zhao G-C (2010) Graphene-based modified electrode for the direct electron transfer of Cytochrome c and biosensing. Electrochem Commun 12: 175-177.
5. Liptak MD, Fagerlund RD, Ledgerwood EC, Wilbanks SM, Bren KL (2010) The proapoptotic G41S mutation to human cytochrome c alters the heme electronic structure and increases the electron self-exchange rate. J Am Chem Soc 133: 1153-1155.
6. Morison IM, Bordé EMC, Cheesman EJ, Cheong PL, Holyoake AJ, et al. (2008) A mutation of human cytochrome c enhances the intrinsic apoptotic pathway but causes only thrombocytopenia. Nat Genet 40: 387-389.
7. Wlodawer A, Svensson LA, Sjoelin L, Gilliland GL (1988) Structure of phosphate-free ribonuclease A refined at 1.26. ANG. Biochemistry 27: 2705-2717.
8. Doucet N, Watt ED, Loria JP (2009) The flexibility of a distant loop modulates active site motion and product release in ribonuclease A. Biochemistry 48: 7160-7168.
9. Dutta S, Basak A, Dasgupta S (2010) Synthesis and ribonuclease A inhibition activity of resorcinol and phloroglucinol derivatives of catechin and epicatechin: Importance of hydroxyl groups. Bioorg Med Chem 18: 6538-6546.
10. Gill A, Scanlon TC, Osipovitch DC, Madden DR, Griswold KE (2011) Crystal Structure of a Charge Engineered Human Lysozyme Having Enhanced Bactericidal Activity. PloS one 6: e16788.
11. Scanlon TC, Teneback CC, Gill A, Bement JL, Weiner JA, et al. (2010) Enhanced antimicrobial activity of engineered human lysozyme. ACS Chem Biol 5: 809-818.
12. Shrivastava S, Nuffer JH, Siegel RW, Dordick JS (2012) Position-specific chemical modification and quantitative proteomics disclose protein orientation adsorbed on silica nanoparticles. Nano letters 12: 1583-1587.
13. He Y, Fan C, Lee S-T (2010) Silicon nanostructures for bioapplications. Nano Today 5: 282-295.
14. Patwardhan SV, Emami FS, Berry RJ, Jones SE, Naik RR, et al. (2012) Chemistry of aqueous silica nanoparticle surfaces and the mechanism of selective peptide adsorption. J Am Chem Soc 134: 6244-6256.
15. Peters BL, Lane JMD, Ismail AE, Grest GS (2012) Fully Atomistic Simulations of the Response of Silica Nanoparticle Coatings to Alkane Solvents. Langmuir 28: 17443-17449.
16. Discovery Studio (2009) version 2.5. AccelrysInc: San Diego, CA, USA. 17. (2010) Materials Studio, Release 5.5. Accelrys Software, Inc. San Diego, CA.
17. Hummer G, Rasaiah JC, Noworyta JP (2001) Water conduction through the hydrophobic channel of a carbon nanotube. Nature 414: 188-190.
18. Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML (1983) Comparison of Simple Potential Functions for Simulating LiquidWater. J Chem Phys 79: 926.
19. Hsin J, Arkhipov A, Yin Y, Stone JE, Schulten K (2008) Using VMD: an introductory tutorial. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 7: 1-5.
20. Kalé L, Skeel R, Bhandarkar M, Brunner R, Gursoy A, et al. (1999) NAMD2: Greater Scalability for Parallel Molecular Dynamics∗1. J Comput Phys 151: 283-312.
21. Feller SE, MacKerell AD (2000) An improved empirical potential energy function for molecular simulations of phospholipids. J Phys Chem B 104: 7510-7515.
22. Brooks BR, Bruccoleri RE, Olafson BD (1983) CHARMM: A Program for Macromolecular Energy, Minimization, and Dynamics Calculations. J Comput Chem 4: 187-217.
23. MacKerell AD, Bashford D, Bellott M, Dunbrack RL, Evanseck JD, et al. (1998) All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J Phys Chem B 102: 3586-3616.
24. Essmann U, Perera L, Berkowitz ML, Darden T, Lee H, et al. (1995) A Smooth Particle Mesh Ewald Method. J Chem Phys 103: 8577-8593.
25. Cycon H, Froese R, Kirsch W, Simon B (1987) Schrdinger operators. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
26. Verdonk ML, Cole JC, Hartshorn MJ, Murray CW, Taylor RD (2003) Improved protein-ligand docking using GOLD. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 52: 609-623.
27. Venkatachalam C, Jiang X, Oldfield T, Waldman M (2003) LigandFit: a novel method for the shape-directed rapid docking of ligands to protein active sites. J Mol Graph Model 21: 289-307.
28. Rao SN, Head MS, Kulkarni A, LaLonde JM (2007) Validation studies of the site-directed docking program LibDock. J Chem Inf Model 47: 2159-2171.
29. Jones G, Willett P, Glen RC, Leach AR, Taylor R (1997) Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. J Mol Biol 267: 727-748.
30. Wu G, Robertson DH, Brooks CL, Vieth M (2003) Detailed analysis of grid-based molecular docking: A case study of CDOCKER - A CHARMm-based MD docking algorithm. J Comput Chem 24: 1549-1562.
31. Vangala K, Ameer F, Salomon G, Le V, Lewis E, et al. (2012) Studying Protein and Gold Nanoparticle Interaction Using Organothiols as Molecular Probes. J Phys Chem C 116: 3645-3652.
32. Yang Z, Si S, Zhang C (2008) Study on the activity and stability of urease immobilized onto nanoporous alumina membranes. Micropor Mesopor Mat 111: 359-366.
33. Katoch J, Kim SN, Kuang Z, Farmer BL, Naik RR, et al. (2012) Structure of a peptide adsorbed on graphene and graphite. Nano Lett 12: 2342-2346.
34. Aubin-Tam ME, Hamad-Schifferli K (2008) Structure and function of nanoparticle-protein conjugates. Biomed Mater 3: 034001.
35. Yang W, Sun L, Weng J, Chen L, Zhang Q (2012) Probing the interaction of bovine haemoglobin with gold nanoparticles. Nanobiotechnology, IET 6: 26-32.
36. Friling S, Notman R, Walsh TR (2009) Probing diameter-selective solubilisation of carbon nanotubes by reversible cyclic peptides using molecular dynamics simulations. Nanoscale 2: 98-106.
37. Zuo G, Huang Q, Wei G, Zhou R, Fang H (2010) Plugging into proteins: poisoning protein function by a hydrophobic nanoparticle. ACS nano 4: 7508-7514.
38. Kim J, Grate JW, Wang P (2006) Nanostructures for enzyme stabilization. Chem Eng Sc 61: 1017-1026.
39. Walkey CD, Olsen JB, Guo H, Emili A, Chan WCW (2012) Nanoparticle size and surface chemistry determine serum protein adsorption and macrophage uptake. J Am Chem Soc 134: 2139-2147.
40. Patra N, Wang B, Král P (2009) Nanodroplet activated and guided folding of graphene nanostructures. Nano Lett 9: 3766-3771.
41. Argyris D, Tummala NR, Striolo A, Cole DR (2008) Molecular structure and dynamics in thin water films at the silica and graphite surfaces. J Phys Chem C 112: 13587-13599.
42. Thompson AB, Calhoun AK, Smagghe BJ, Stevens MD, Wotkowicz MT, et al. (2011) A Gold Nanoparticle Platform for Protein-Protein Interactions and Drug Discovery. ACS Appl Mater Inter 3: 2979-2987.
43. Sahoo D, Bhattacharya P, Patra HK, Mandal P, Chakravorti S (2011) Gold nanoparticle induced conformational changes in heme protein. J Nanopart Res 13: 6755-6760.
44. Frampton MB, Zelisko PM (2012) A comparison of protease active sites and their ability to process silicon-based substrates. Silicon 4: 51-56.
45. Takahashi H, Li B, Sasaki T, Miyazaki C, Kajino T, et al. (2000) Catalytic activity in organic solvents and stability of immobilized enzymes depend on the pore size and surface characteristics of mesoporous silica. Chem Mater 12: 3301-3305.
46. Zsila F, Kámán J, Bogányi B, Józsvai D (2011) Binding of alkaloids into the S1 specificity pocket of α-chymotrypsin: Evidence from induced circular dichroism spectra. Org Biomol Chem 9: 4127-4137.
47. Li J, Wang J, Gavalas VG, Atwood DA, Bachas LG (2003) Alumina-pepsin hybrid nanoparticles with orientation-specific enzyme coupling. Nano Lett 3: 55-58.
48. Zuo G, Zhou X, Huang Q, Fang H, Zhou R (2011) Adsorption of Villin Headpiece onto Graphene, Carbon Nanotube, and C60: Effect of Contacting Surface Curvatures on Binding Affinity. J Phys Chem C 115: 23323-23328.
49. Sun X, Feng Z, Hou T, Li Y (2014) Mechanism of Graphene Oxide as an Enzyme Inhibitor from Molecular Dynamics Simulations. ACS Appl Mater Inter 6: 7153-7163.
50. Pollastri G, Mclysaght A (2005) Porter: a new, accurate server for protein secondary structure prediction. Bioinformatics 21: 1719-1720.
51. McGuffin LJ, Bryson K, Jones DT (2000) The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server. Bioinformatics 16: 404-405.