Efficient mRNA polyadenylation requires a ubiquitin-like domain, a zinc knuckle, and a RING finger domain, all contained in the Mpe1 protein

Molecular and Cellular Biology

Volumn 34, Issue 21, 2014, Pages 3955-3967

  Lee, Susan D ^a   Moore, Claire L ^a  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MESSENGER RNA; MESSENGER RNA PRECURSOR; MPE1 PROTEIN; PAP1 PROTEIN; PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS; POLYNUCLEOTIDE ADENYLYLTRANSFERASE; UBIQUITIN; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE E3; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CLEAVAGE AND POLYADENYLATION SPECIFICITY FACTOR; FUNGAL RNA; MPE1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; PAP1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA SEQUENCE; NONHUMAN; POINT MUTATION; POLYADENYLATION; PROTEIN CLEAVAGE; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN PURIFICATION; PROTEIN RNA BINDING; REPORTER GENE; RING FINGER MOTIF; RNA BINDING; RNA PROCESSING; RNA SPLICING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION; UBIQUITINATION; WESTERN BLOTTING; ZINC KNUCKLE; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CHEMISTRY; GENETICS; METABOLISM; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYSIOLOGY; RNA STABILITY;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; MRNA CLEAVAGE AND POLYADENYLATION FACTORS; POLYADENYLATION; POLYNUCLEOTIDE ADENYLYLTRANSFERASE; RING FINGER DOMAINS; RNA STABILITY; RNA, FUNGAL; RNA, MESSENGER; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; UBIQUITINATION;

EID: 84907833888     PISSN: 02707306     EISSN: 10985549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00077-14     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Elkon R, Ugalde AP, Agami R. 2013. Alternative cleavage and polyadenylation: extent, regulation and function. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14:496-506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg3482.
2. Graber JH, Nazeer FI, Yeh PC, Kuehner JN, Borikar S, Hoskinson D, Moore CL. 2013. DNA damage induces targeted, genome-wide variation of poly(A) sites in budding yeast. Genome Res. 23:1690-1703. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.144964.112.
3. Tian B, Manley JL. 2013. Alternative cleavage and polyadenylation: the long and short of it. Trends Biochem. Sci. 38:312-320. http://dx.doi.org /10.1016/j.tibs.2013.03.005.
4. Chan S, Choi EA, Shi Y. 2011. Pre-mRNA 3'-end processing complex assembly and function. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 2:321-335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wrna.54.
5. Darmon SK, Lutz CS. 2012. mRNA 3' end processing factors: a phylogenetic comparison. Comp. Funct. Genomics 2012:876893. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/876893.
6. Millevoi S, Vagner S. 2010. Molecular mechanisms of eukaryotic premRNA 3' end processing regulation. Nucleic Acids Res. 38:2757-2774. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp1176.
7. Vo LT, Minet M, Schmitter JM, Lacroute F, Wyers F. 2001. Mpe1, a zinc knuckle protein, is an essential component of yeast cleavage and polyadenylation factor required for the cleavage and polyadenylation of mRNA. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:8346-8356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.21.24.8346-8356.2001.
8. Pugh DJ, Eiso AB, Faro A, Lutya PT, Hoffmann E, Rees DJ. 2006. DWNN, a novel ubiquitin-like domain, implicates RBBP6 in mRNA pro-cessing and ubiquitin-like pathways. BMC Struct. Biol. 6:1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6807-6-1.
9. Simons A, Melamed-Bessudo C, Wolkowicz R, Sperling J, Sperling R, Eisenbach L, Rotter V. 1997. PACT: cloning and characterization of a cellular p53 binding protein that interacts with Rb. Oncogene 14:145-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1200825.
10. Shi Y, Di Giammartino DC, Taylor D, Sarkeshik A, Rice WJ, Yates JR, III, Frank J, Manley JL. 2009. Molecular architecture of the human pre-mRNA 3' processing complex. Mol. Cell 33:365-376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2008.12.028.
11. Hicke L, Schubert HL, Hill CP. 2005. Ubiquitin-binding domains. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6:610-621. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm1701.
12. Kiel C, Serrano L. 2006. The ubiquitin domain superfold: structure-based sequence alignments and characterization of binding epitopes. J. Mol. Biol. 355:821-844. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2005.10.010.
13. Su V, Lau AF. 2009. Ubiquitin-like and ubiquitin-associated domain proteins: significance in proteasomal degradation. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 66: 2819-2833. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-009-0048-9.
14. Ali PS, Ghoshdastider U, Hoffmann J, Brutschy B, Filipek S. 2012. Recognition of the let-7g miRNA precursor by human Lin28B. FEBS Lett. 586:3986-3990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2012.09.034.
15. Cavaloc Y, Bourgeois CF, Kister L, Stevenin J. 1999. The splicing factors 9G8 and SRp20 transactivate splicing through different and specific enhancers. RNA 5:468-483. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1355838299981967.
16. Fasken MB, Leung SW, Banerjee A, Kodani MO, Chavez R, Bowman EA, Purohit MK, Rubinson ME, Rubinson EH, Corbett AH. 2011. Air1 zinc knuckles 4 and 5 and a conserved IWRXY motif are critical for the function and integrity of the Trf4/5-Air1/2-Mtr4 polyadenylation (TRAMP) RNA quality control complex. J. Biol. Chem. 286:37429 - 37445. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.271494.
17. Garrey SM, Voelker R, Berglund JA. 2006. An extended RNA binding site for the yeast branch point-binding protein and the role of its zinc knuckle domains in RNA binding. J. Biol. Chem. 281:27443-27453. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M603137200.
18. Holub P, Lalakova J, Cerna H, Pasulka J, Sarazova M, Hrazdilova K, Arce MS, Hobor F, Stefl R, Vanacova S. 2012. Air2p is critical for the assembly and RNA-binding of the TRAMP complex and the KOW domain of Mtr4p is crucial for exosome activation. Nucleic Acids Res. 40: 5679-5693. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks223.
19. Loughlin FE, Gebert LF, Towbin H, Brunschweiger A, Hall J, Allain FH. 2012. Structural basis of pre-let-7miRNArecognition by the zinc knuckles of pluripotency factor Lin28. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19:84-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2202.
20. Lu K, Heng X, Summers MF. 2011. Structural determinants and mechanism of HIV-1 genome packaging. J. Mol. Biol. 410:609-633. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2011.04.029.
21. Deshaies RJ, Joazeiro CA. 2009. RING domain E3 ubiquitin ligases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 78:399-434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.78.101807.093809.
22. Hatakeyama S, Nakayama KI. 2003. U-box proteins as a new family of ubiquitin ligases. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 302:635-645. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-291X(03)00245-6.
23. Kappo MA, Eiso AB, Hassem F, Atkinson RA, Faro A, Muleya V, Mulaudzi T, Poole JO, McKenzie JM, Chibi M, Moolman-Smook JC, Rees DJ, Pugh DJ. 2012. Solution structure of RING finger-like domain of retinoblastoma-binding protein-6 (RBBP6) suggests it functions as a U-box. J. Biol. Chem. 287:7146-7158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.217059.
24. Metzger MB, Pruneda JN, Klevit RE, Weissman AM. 2014. RING-type E3 ligases: master manipulators of E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes and ubiquitination. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1843:47-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.05.026.
25. Hoppe T. 2005. Multiubiquitylation by E4 enzymes: 'one size' doesn't fit all. Trends Biochem. Sci. 30:183-187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2005.02.004.
26. Chibi M, Meyer M, Skepu A, Rees DJG, Moolman-Smook JC, Pugh DJR. 2008. RBBP6 interacts with multifunctional protein YB-1 through its RING finger domain, leading to ubiquitination and proteosomal degradation of YB-1. J. Mol. Biol. 384:908-916. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2008.09.060.
27. Li L, Deng B, Xing G, Teng Y, Tian C, Cheng X, Yin X, Yang J, Gao X, Zhu Y, Sun Q, Zhang L, Yang X, He F. 2007. PACT is a negative regulator of p53 and essential for cell growth and embryonic development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104:7951-7956. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073 /pnas.0701916104.
28. Bellare P, Small EC, Huang X, Wohlschlegel JA, Staley JP, Sontheimer EJ. 2008. A role for ubiquitin in the spliceosome assembly pathway. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15:444-451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1401.
29. Geng F, Wenzel S, Tansey WP. 2012. Ubiquitin and proteasomes in transcription. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 81:177-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-052110-120012.
30. Song EJ, Werner SL, Neubauer J, Stegmeier F, Aspden J, Rio D, Harper JW, Elledge SJ, Kirschner MW, Rape M. 2010. The Prp19 complex and the Usp4Sart3 deubiquitinating enzyme control reversible ubiquitination at the spliceosome. Genes Dev. 24:1434-1447. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101 /gad.1925010.
31. Tutucci E, Stutz F. 2011. Keeping mRNPs in check during assembly and nuclear export. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12:377-384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm3119.
32. Ramos PC, Hockendorff J, Johnson ES, Varshavsky A, Dohmen RJ. 1998. Ump1p is required for proper maturation of the 20S proteasome and becomes its substrate upon completion of the assembly. Cell 92:489- 499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80942-3.
33. Hilt W, Enenkel C, Gruhler A, Singer T, Wolf DH. 1993. The PRE4 gene codes for a subunit of the yeast proteasome necessary for peptidylglutamyl-peptide-hydrolyzing activity. Mutations link the proteasome to stress- and ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis. J. Biol. Chem. 268:3479- 3486.
34. He X, Moore C. 2005. Regulation of yeast mRNA 3' end processing by phosphorylation. Mol. Cell 19:619-629. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2005.07.016.
35. James P, Halladay J, Craig EA. 1996. Genomic libraries and a host strain designed for highly efficient two-hybrid selection in yeast. Genetics 144: 1425-1436.
36. Cross FR. 1997. 'Marker swap' plasmids: convenient tools for budding yeast molecular genetics. Yeast 13:647-653. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002 /(SICI)1097-0061(19970615)13:7_647::AID-YEA115 3.0.CO;2-#.
37. Boeke JD, Trueheart J, Natsoulis G, Fink GR. 1987. 5-Fluoroorotic acid as a selective agent in yeast molecular genetics. Methods Enzymol. 154: 164-175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(87)54076-9.
38. Ho SN, Hunt HD, Horton RM, Pullen JK, Pease LR. 1989. Site-directed mutagenesis by overlap extension using the polymerase chain reaction. Gene 77:51-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(89)90358-2.
39. Zhao J, Kessler M, Helmling S, O'Connor JP, Moore C. 1999. Pta1, a component of yeast CF II, is required for both cleavage and poly(A) addition of mRNA precursor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:7733-7740.
40. Hochstrasser M, Ellison MJ, Chau V, Varshavsky A. 1991. The shortlivedMAT _2 transcriptional regulator is ubiquitinated in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88:4606-4610. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.88.11.4606.
41. Gross S, Moore C. 2001. Five subunits are required for reconstitution of the cleavage and polyadenylation activities of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cleavage factor I. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98:6080-6085. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.101046598.
42. Helmling S, Zhelkovsky A, Moore CL. 2001. Fip1 regulates the activity of poly(A) polymerase through multiple interactions. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21: 2026-2037. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.21.6.2026-2037.2001.
43. Butler JS, Sadhale PP, Platt T. 1990. RNA processing in vitro produces mature 3' ends of a variety of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mRNAs. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10:2599-2605.
44. Dichtl B, Keller W. 2001. Recognition of polyadenylation sites in yeast pre-mRNAs by cleavage and polyadenylation factor. EMBO J. 20:3197- 3209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/20.12.3197.
45. Puig O, Caspary F, Rigaut G, Rutz B, Bouveret E, Bragado-Nilsson E, Wilm M, Seraphin B. 2001. The tandem affinity purification (TAP) method: a general procedure of protein complex purification. Methods 24:218-229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1183.
46. Jones GM, Stalker J, Humphray S, West A, Cox T, Rogers J, Dunham I, Prelich G. 2008. A systematic library for comprehensive overexpression screens in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat. Methods 5:239-241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1181.
47. Ghazy MA, He X, Singh BN, Hampsey M, Moore C. 2009. The essential N terminus of the Pta1 scaffold protein is required for snoRNA transcription termination and Ssu72 function but is dispensable for pre-mRNA 3'-end processing. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29:2296-2307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01514-08.
48. Ezeokonkwo C, Ghazy MA, Zhelkovsky A, Yeh PC, Moore C. 2012. Novel interactions at the essential N-terminus of poly(A) polymerase that could regulate poly(A) addition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett. 586:1173-1178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2012.03.036.
49. De Guzman RN, Wu ZR, Stalling CC, Pappalardo L, Borer PN, Summers MF. 1998. Structure of the HIV-1 nucleocapsid protein bound to the SL3 psi-RNA recognition element. Science 279:384-388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.279.5349.384.
50. Barabino SM, Ohnacker M, Keller W. 2000. Distinct roles of two Yth1p domains in 3'-end cleavage and polyadenylation of yeast pre-mRNAs. EMBO J. 19:3778-3787. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/19.14.3778.
51. Dichtl B, Blank D, Sadowski M, Hubner W, Weiser S, Keller W. 2002. Yhh1p/Cft1p directly links poly(A) site recognition and RNA polymerase II transcription termination. EMBO J. 21:4125-4135. http://dx.doi.org /10.1093/emboj/cdf390.
52. Graber JH, McAllister GD, Smith TF. 2002. Probabilistic prediction of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mRNA 3'-processing sites. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:1851-1858. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/30.8.1851.
53. Bucheli ME, He X, Kaplan CD, Moore CL, Buratowski S. 2007. Polyadenylation site choice in yeast is affected by competition between Npl3 and polyadenylation factor CFI. RNA 13:1756-1764. http://dx.doi.org/10.1261/rna.607207.
54. He X, Khan AU, Cheng H, Pappas DL, Jr, Hampsey M, Moore CL. 2003. Functional interactions between the transcription and mRNA 3' end processing machineries mediated by Ssu72 and Sub1. Genes Dev. 17:1030-1042. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1075203.
55. Finley D. 2009. Recognition and processing of ubiquitin-protein conjugates by the proteasome. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 78:477-513. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.78.081507.101607.
56. Ramos PC, Marques AJ, London MK, Dohmen RJ. 2004. Role of C-terminal extensions of subunits 2 and 7 in assembly and activity of eukaryotic proteasomes. J. Biol. Chem. 279:14323-14330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M308757200.
57. Dikic I, Wakatsuki S, Walters KJ. 2009. Ubiquitin-binding domains- from structures to functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10:659-671. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2767.
58. Verma R, Peters NR, D'Onofrio M, Tochtrop GP, Sakamoto KM, Varadan R, Zhang M, Coffino P, Fushman D, Deshaies RJ, King RW. 2004. Ubistatins inhibit proteasome-dependent degradation by binding the ubiquitin chain. Science 306:117-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126 /science.1100946.
59. Lee DH, Goldberg AL. 1998. Proteasome inhibitors cause induction of heat shock proteins and trehalose, which together confer thermotolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:30-38.
60. Adachi K, Lakka V, Zhao Y, Surrey S. 2004. Ubiquitylation of nascent globin chains in a cell-free system. J. Biol. Chem. 279:41767-41774. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M405059200.
61. Lavelin I, Beer A, Kam Z, Rotter V, Oren M, Navon A, Geiger B. 2009. Discovery of novel proteasome inhibitors using a high-content cell-based screening system. PLoS One 4:e8503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008503.
62. Mizrahi N, Moore C. 2000. Posttranslational phosphorylation and ubiquitination of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae poly(A) polymerase at the S/G2 stage of the cell cycle. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:2794-2802. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.20.8.2794-2802.2000.
63. Singh RK, Gonzalez M, Kabbaj MH, Gunjan A. 2012. Novel E3 ubiquitin ligases that regulate histone protein levels in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS One 7:e36295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036295.
64. Ito T, Chiba T, Ozawa R, Yoshida M, Hattori M, Sakaki Y. 2001. A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98:4569-4574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.061034498.
65. Peng J, Schwartz D, Elias JE, Thoreen CC, Cheng D, Marsischky G, Roelofs J, Finley D, Gygi SP. 2003. A proteomics approach to understanding protein ubiquitination. Nat. Biotechnol. 21:921-926. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt849.
66. Ren J, Kee Y, Huibregtse JM, Piper RC. 2007. Hse1, a component of the yeast Hrs-STAM ubiquitin-sorting complex, associates with ubiquitin peptidases and a ligase to control sorting efficiency into multivesicular bodies. Mol. Biol. Cell 18:324-335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E06 -06-0557.
67. Yu H, Braun P, Yildirim MA, Lemmens I, Venkatesan K, Sahalie J, Hirozane-Kishikawa T, Gebreab F, Li N, Simonis N, Hao T, Rual JF, Dricot A, Vazquez A, Murray RR, Simon C, Tardivo L, Tam S, Svrzikapa N, Fan C, de Smet AS, Motyl A, Hudson ME, Park J, Xin X, Cusick ME, Moore T, Boone C, Snyder M, Roth FP, Barabasi AL, Tavernier J, Hill DE, Vidal M. 2008. High-quality binary protein interaction map of the yeast interactome network. Science 322:104-110. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1158684.
68. del Olmo M, Mizrahi N, Gross S, Moore CL. 1997. The Uba2 and Ufd1 proteins of Saccharomyces cerevisiae interact with poly(A) polymerase and affect the polyadenylation activity of cell extracts. Mol. Gen. Genet. 255: 209-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004380050491.
69. Vethantham V, Rao N, Manley JL. 2007. Sumoylation modulates the assembly and activity of the pre-mRNA 3' processing complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27:8848-8858. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01186-07.
70. Vethantham V, Rao N, Manley JL. 2008. Sumoylation regulates multiple aspects of mammalian poly(A) polymerase function. Genes Dev. 22:499- 511. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1628208.
71. Saguez C, Schmid M, Olesen JR, Ghazy MA, Qu X, Poulsen MB, Nasser T, Moore C, Jensen TH. 2008. Nuclear mRNA surveillance in THO/sub2 mutants is triggered by inefficient polyadenylation. Mol. Cell 31:91-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2008.04.030.
72. Gwizdek C, Iglesias N, Rodriguez MS, Ossareh-Nazari B, Hobeika M, Divita G, Stutz F, Dargemont C. 2006. Ubiquitin-associated domain of Mex67 synchronizes recruitment of the mRNA export machinery with transcription. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103:16376-16381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0607941103.
73. Libri D, Dower K, Boulay J, Thomsen R, Rosbash M, Jensen TH. 2002. Interactions between mRNA export commitment, 3'-end quality control, and nuclear degradation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:8254-8266. http://dx.doi.org /10.1128/MCB.22.23.8254-8266.2002.
74. Johnson SA, Kim H, Erickson B, Bentley DL. 2011. The export factor Yra1 modulates mRNA 3' end processing. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18: 1164-1171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2126.
75. Iglesias N, Tutucci E, Gwizdek C, Vinciguerra P, Von Dach E, Corbett AH, Dargemont C, Stutz F. 2010. Ubiquitin-mediated mRNP dynamics and surveillance prior to budding yeast mRNA export. Genes Dev. 24: 1927-1938. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.583310.
76. Vitaliano-Prunier A, Babour A, Herissant L, Apponi L, Margaritis T, Holstege FC, Corbett AH, Gwizdek C, Dargemont C. 2012. H2B ubiquitylation controls the formation of export-competent mRNP. Mol. Cell 45:132-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2011.12.011.
77. Mandel CR, Bai Y, Tong L. 2008. Protein factors in pre-mRNA 3'-end processing. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 65:1099-1122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007 /s00018-007-7474-3.
78. Cano F, Bye H, Duncan LM, Buchet-Poyau K, Billaud M, Wills MR, Lehner PJ. 2012. The RNA-binding E3 ubiquitin ligase MEX-3C links ubiquitination with MHC-I mRNA degradation. EMBO J. 31:3596-3606. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2012.218.
79. Cano F, Miranda-Saavedra D, Lehner PJ. 2010. RNA-binding E3 ubiquitin ligases: novel players in nucleic acid regulation. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 38:1621-1626. http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BST0381621.
80. Biderman L, Manley JL, Prives C. 2012. Mdm2 and MdmX as regulators of gene expression. Genes Cancer 3:264-273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177 /1947601912455331.
81. Naski N, Gajjar M, Bourougaa K, Malbert-Colas L, Fahraeus R, Candeias MM. 2009. The p53 mRNA-Mdm2 interaction. Cell Cycle 8:31-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.8.1.7326.
82. Seyfried NT, Xu P, Duong DM, Cheng D, Hanfelt J, Peng J. 2008. Systematic approach for validating the ubiquitinated proteome. Anal. Chem. 80:4161-4169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac702516a.
83. Swaney DL, Beltrao P, Starita L, Guo A, Rush J, Fields S, Krogan NJ, Villen J. 2013. Global analysis of phosphorylation and ubiquitylation cross-talk in protein degradation. Nat. Methods 10:676-682. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2519.